Jump to content

As The World Turns Discussion Thread


edgeofnik

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 17.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • DRW50

    2972

  • DramatistDreamer

    1958

  • Soapsuds

    1716

  • P.J.

    823

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

I don't remember Mary Kay Adams on this show. Did she have a major storyline on this show. I am probably blanking out on her storyline. Is this around the time that Glynnis O'Connor was nuMargo? I have a vague memory of something to do with an architect. Anyway, I posted this in another thread, but Michael Logan rated soap hoppers at the time and Mary Kay Adams was a hit for her role as Neal on the show:

Please register in order to view this content

There's also an interview with Douglas Marland about Margo's HIV status after the rape:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Mary Kay Adams played artist Neal Alcott who had taken a job working as Art Director for Lucinda's Worldwide.  At the same time, architect Royce Keller (played by Terry Lester) was hired to design Worldwide's new tower.  Unbeknownst to Lucinda, they were her long-lost half siblings and they wanted to get to know Lucinda better before revealing themselves to  her.  Royce in particular had anger towards Lucinda for "abandoning" them when they were kids once the teenaged Lucinda left home after high school.  Royce and Lucinda never got along, but Neal and Lucinda formed a strong friendship and Neal ached to tell Lucinda the truth -- but Neal was murdered before she had the chance.

This had been the planned storyline all along (which was why Adams had signed only for 6 months.) The problem for the TV audience was that Neal had become a very popular character in her short stay and her death was a very unwelcome plot twist -- especially since the storyline offered no satisfying ending for the Neal/Lucinda relationship.  Lucinda found out about Neal being her sister AFTER Neal's death.  So there was very little emotional payoff for the audience.

Doug Marland unfortunately died during this storyline's arc and my suspicion/hope was that, if he had lived and had seen the onscreen chemistry between Adams and Hubbard, he might have changed the story to allow a real sister relationship to occur between Neal and Lucinda.  Lucinda came to care for Neal as a friend and that allowed Lucinda to trust again -- which I believe was the really important part of this storyline.  Maybe Marland could have asked Adams to extend her contract by another 6 months or maybe change her murder to simply an attempted murder?

Anyway - Marland died in March of 1993 and Adams fulfilled her contract and was gone by June of 1993.  Royce was eventually revealed as Neal's killer (it had been an accident during one of his multiple-personality episodes) and Lucinda attempted to repair her relationship with him.  But Terry Lester (who was an amazing Jack on YR) was not nearly as charming or interesting as Royce (which led some soap journalists to snark that Marland had killed off the wrong sibling) and without Marland to champion the character, Lester/Keller was gone by 1994.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

You said this very well. When Lester left, he said he was proud to have played out Marland's last great storyline. That was a classy statement but...was it a great storyline? I think so much of it rested on being a Lester showcase that just wasn't especially compelling, as well as a story that suffered from the miscasting of Emily (KMH was at best of times a competent actress who had a very spotty history of chemistry with her leading men...she also lacked the depth Emily should have had).

There was also nothing left once the story was over. Did any viewers care if he stayed with Emily? I don't even know what all he did after that. I think he rode a motorcycle and was friendly with Julie and a few others.

I adored Neal. That was the first time I had ever seen Mary Kay Adams. She put her all into the role. She clicked with everyone. On paper, that's great, because it should mean we're devastated to lose her, but that doesn't work as well when the aftermath just isn't worth the loss.

They overcasted the role. Adams was too vibrant. 

I think they should have cast someone like Marcia McCabe - a good actress, likeable, worked well with everyone, believable as a relative to Lucinda, but not so charming that she was going to leave a huge hole. She did well enough in a similar type of short run on OLTL in the late '80s.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Are there clips anywhere of John Colenback and Jane House?  (Dan and Liz).  That was my favorite story.  Star-crossed lovers ...wound up as in-laws when Liz married Dan's brother Paul.  All of 1970 and 1971 when there were Stewart family gatherings we could count on Dan and Liz looking longingly at each other .... while the live organ guy would play the refrain of "the song of love is a sad song"  in the background.  Ah...those were the days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Always good to revisit. I'm assuming that is parts of 2 episodes. In the first sequence Dan has an injured arm but he's fine in the latter part.

I wonder what caused Irna to seemingly change direction? In a matter of months Paul and Liz were dead, Dan left town and Susan married and divorced Bruce.

It seemed years of storyline past and future were dropped.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I guess that is because they did every show live but i would think they would also make a tape for the west coast.  But then I heard they re-used the tapes to save money.  What a waste.

Live shows did have some blips though.  I remember the actor playing Paul Stewart losing his toupee in one fight scene 

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think Irna had a choice.  if i am not mistaken Paul died never knowing Dan was Betsy's father.  That revelation may have put her two leads in a 'bad light' maybe.  And then also, the audience may have been pushing for Dan and Liz to finally get together after 3 years of waiting.  Can only make them wait for so long.  Of course, switching actresses in the middle of that hurt that slightly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's incredible to me how ATWT experienced so much upheaval during that period, yet remained at or near the top of the ratings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I love many things about BTG very much. For me, it's greatest strength is how the family relationships are so beautifully written. The deep love between family members while acknowledging each other's flaws--it's SO GOOD.  The best of the best is the two sister relationships: loving but very different sisters Dani and Nicole and adversarial sisters Kat and Eva. These two relationships can anchor the show for many years to come, in my opinion. (The one caveat is that the young and very talented Colby and Ambyr may want to leave the show sooner rather than later, but that's to be expected). My biggest problem with this show is this: Where are the romantic love stories? Where are the star-crossed lovers? Almost every character on this show is married, or in a committed relationship, or just fooling around. Right now the only potential for this are in the Ashley/Andre/Derek and Kat/Tomas/Eva situations. Like a lot of people, I feel the sooner they ditch Ashley and Derek, the better. I hate picking on actors, but the characters are so blah and bland it's like they're a parody of soap characters. I like Andre, and there's some indication they might have him become more serious about Dani, but I don't see that becoming a big love story. I could be wrong. Kat and Eva fighting over a man would be amazing. Over Tomas? No.  I've noticed on social media some people are starting to ship Kat and Jacob. I think that shows how much viewers long for a messy love story. There is much I enjoy about BTG and I have no intention of bailing on it. But over all my many years of watching soap operas, the thing that always got me the most excited about them was the question: "When are those two finally going to get together?"
    • FROM THE VAULT: WEEKLY DAYTIME NIELSEN RATINGS: WEEKS OF 11/26/73-11/30/73 & 12/3/73-12/7/73:

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

        Some initial thoughts.   1) a Who's who back in the day with an assortment of well known performers. 2) Surprised Debra Messing would agree to play a conservative character 3) Not surprised a network didn't pick this up because showing a conservative that is human/likable is a no no in Hollywood LOL
    • Yes from when they went on Let’s Make a Deal too. Pam stole Forrester designs for Jackie M. Of course a month later we saw Nick, Lesley, Owen, and Bridget all exit in the same episode.
    • Great pairing that seemed to come out of the blue! Around that time, it felt like Sheffer/Goutman didn’t really know what to do with Emily or Hal. And KM and BH had surprisingly great chemistry. It was good for Emily especially because she was coming off those unsympathetic years with the Tom affair and then running the Intruder and essentially just being a busybody.
    • I think the issue with Lulu is less the character (which was the issue in the Julie Berman days under Guza II) and more the lack of nuance. The current GH team rarely writes nuance for any character or at least can't sustain it for long, or they reserve it for a favored few. I also think the rooting interest at GH BTS often remains on preferred characters or actors - BLQ/Setton - vs. Laura's kids. So it's easy to make Lulu the heavy if you think Brook Lynn and Chase are the money on this show. I don't, but I think FV does. And that's not to say I think Amanda Setton is bad in the role, or that I would get rid of BLQ. I don't trend towards either (though I do think that if Setton's personal beliefs keep getting in the way of material I would reluctantly recast). I think Brook Lynn is essential to use as a lead presently. But I don't think it needs to be the black and white dichotomy of suffering young matriarch BLQ and aggressor Lulu. While it's good that unlike in the Guza years they can recognize that Lulu can be obnoxious and rash, can be her own worst enemy and that that is part of the character, it can be toned down or given more layers than it has of late. There's nothing wrong there the writing can't fix.
    • 1999: I just watched it. It felt so primetime. La Lucci is making history. Aretha's daydreaming segment. @Contessa Donatella Thank you, my love. So helpful and informative as always. adding them to my queue.
    • I know this isn’t a usual or anywhere near universal take, but I loved the relatively brief Hal/Emily relationship/marriage more than I ever thought I would have with KMH/BH.
    • In my field (not that) I've written my share of dreck when it's what people wanted vs. something good. In the end what matters is the check. These pilots may not be great, but whether or not those writers intended otherwise they got paid.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy