Jump to content

As The World Turns Discussion Thread


edgeofnik

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 17.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • DRW50

    2969

  • DramatistDreamer

    1958

  • Soapsuds

    1715

  • P.J.

    823

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Written properly, Gunnar could've been brought back virtually any time up to the show's cancellation, the possibilities were endless for any writer worth their salt, especially seeing that the character never 'died' onscreen.  Barbara had him declared legally dead (eventually) but I don't remember there being any solid evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I understand the plot value in getting rid of Gunner.  A part of the focus of the story was Ariel, so killing off Gunner moved her story forward.  Also, Gunner was never going to be Barbara's "end-game" or the love of her life, so she needed to be free.  Finally, being a rich orphaned teen made Dusty a perfect love object.

 

However,  Gunner and Burke played such similar roles in the story that they even died of similar diseases.  Gunner was around for just under three years, so it was probably the end of Hugo's initial contract.  So, I still wonder why were they both necessary to the plot as it was initially designed? And was it always the plan to kill them both?  Was there critical backlash to Hugo's performance? Did ratings go down during the romantic story?

 

It just seems like there were an unnecessary amount of Stenbeck heirs.

 

Upon reflection, it strains credulity that James would be so concerned about the heir.  He had already inherited his fortune legally, so no court could make him give it back.  Gunner and James were both already successful in their respective legal and criminal businesses, so they wouldn't need additional income.  Senior Stenbeck (who I always confuse with Brandon Spaulding) knew who was his legitimate heir when he wrote his will, and he could leave his money according to his wishes; regardless of legitimacy.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

With each subsequent writing regime, the Stenbeck heir origin stories became worse.  I think the very worst had to be Henry Colman's Stenbeck heir story.  Totally pointless, idiotic and annoying. 

It seems by that time, TIIC were determined to have Barbara's endgame story to be tied to a Stenbeck man, even if they had to invent yet another Stenbeck man.  By that time, Gunnar would've been the least illogical option, lol.

 

 

I watched a block of ATWT episodes from 1988 and Meg's hair...whewww!  Not only the hair but the outfits...Meg looks like she wandered off the set of The Golden Girls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Imdb has it listed from 1982-1985. But they also have him on AMC from 84-85. Then Capitol in 86, and GH in 88. I thought his WT run was only 2 years, actually. 

 

I disagree wholeheartedly about Gunnar/Barbara. In some ways, he definitely was the love of Barbara's life. Yes, Hal lasted longer, but I always thought it was the loss of Gunnar that broke her (yes, I know she technically flipped out over Brian...but he'd been the one helping her with Gunnar's death.)

 

Wills are always murky in soapville, but I always thought James craved the power of the name (initially) as much as the fortune. To hand it over to some photographer, was a such an insult as finding out he was born the son of a maid. 

Edited by P.J.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I saw that it was mentioned in another thread but I didn't catch it and just saw an article today. Philip Bosco passed away earlier this month. He was in many different works but I remember him best as Sam's "father," Elliot, who popped up in 1994 and 1995. I really loved that character, and Bosco worked so well with Brooke Alexander. He was one of the guest actors, like Jenny O'Hara and Claire Bloom, who kept me interested in ATWT when the writing by that point often did not. 

 

https://www.welovesoaps.net/2018/12/philip-bosco-dead-at-88.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Even though a large portion of the 1988 episodes that are up on You Tube, particularly during the strike, seemed to be bloated by endless flashbacks, there are some interesting BTS facts. The actor who played Barclay Lang, John Ottavino, his 1988 stint doesn't appear on IMDB but his 2007 appearance (as Dr. Sherwood?) does.  One would think that the more memorable storyline with Angel and Henry Lang would've been listed on his page but it isn't.

 

With the appearance of Lilith as well as Tom's discovery in Greece of Margo's pregnancy, the episodes become less redundant with filler and flashbacks, less Snyder-centric (somewhat) and more interesting on a consistent basis. Also by this time, the writer's strike has been over since August and these episodes are mid September.
Speaking of Lilith, so interesting to discover that Sara Botsford has been doing quite a bit of family-friendly fare these days.  She recently played Marilla Cuthbert in the most recent Anne of Green Gables T.V. movies (Fire & Dew, The Good Stars) that aired on Canadian television last year.  She's also appearing the Holly Hobbie television series (didn't know there was such a thing!).  As a fan of the Anne of Green Gable series, novels and original Canadian t.v. series in the late 80s/early 90s, I'm intrigued. 

Ironically, Botsford's character Lillith used to scare me as a child.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 member




  • Recent Posts

    • I do agree that a revival of EON would work, if it doesn't fall into doing all of the typical soap opera tropes... which it became guilty of in the final few years of the show with the over abundance of Raven/Sky at the expense of the actual detectives, police, etc. And I know it was mentioned earlier that Raven had lost any true connections on the show with the death of her on screen mother, and the loss of April/Draper/Deborah.. and I do agree with that. I actually thought the show would have done something with the Shelley character that could have connected her to the Raven character.  There were a few scenes where the two would have scenes and size one another up before they would go their separate ways.. so I assumed perhaps they would have been revealed as half-siblings and/or perhaps cousins.  Alas.. not to be.
    • It definitely flowed beautifully. So much that I was annoyed when Vanessa/Doug because I wanted to get back to the party. I know it was intentional to build up tension and suspense. It worked. lol. I'm glad it was there in hingsight because it gave us that great conversation between Doug and Vanessa. Foreshadowing? And yesss!!! This episode was sooo old school soap giving beat after beat after beat leading up to the unveiling of Eva as Ted's daughter. And we still have plenty of fallout/aftereffects to work through.   Speaking of...Bill, Bill, Bill lol. Good to have confirmation HE was the scary lawyer.   I'm sure I will have a busy Monday, but I can't wait for it. I don't know what I'm looking forward to more. Probably Anita vs Silk Press Sheila tbh. And yes, I feel they will be matching each other 'blow for blow.' 
    • And if they go there, it could also be tied to Johnny completely cutting him off, possibly going to work for Titan, etc.
    • @AbcNbc247 maybe it is just that they've gone to that well too often, and I don't like when DAYS goes dark, but I'm OK with EJ abusing drugs, and just skipping the whole sobriety part. Side note: experiencing hallucinations of my son killing me would be enough for me to never want to take a pill again.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Part of the reason that Courtney worked at OLTL was because the show had an actual character for her to play.  One that was somewhat different than her character on AW, and after the way she was treated over at AW.. it had to have been nice to be courted onto a new soap that actually valued your contributions.  
    • I figured the "long" was already implied 
    • You'll be very impressed 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • And then next week it will out of sync again.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I see what you mean about EJ, but at the same time, 

      Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy