Jump to content

“Disney Junior” Replaces SOAPnet in 2012


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 241
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I'm with you, Khan. Every year I read a prediction from fans that soaps have maybe five years left. That's been going on for at least the last five years. I think they're on borrowed time, now, and can't see soaps lasting much beyond the next couple of years. Soap fans are losing their 'line ups' and I think it was the 'diversity' of offerings that made the difference.

When the BnB made me ill, I could tune it out for a while and watch more GH or GL. Now? If the BnB makes me ill, I don't have many other choices and find myself tuning out daytime all together. Constantly cutting back the number of daytime shows has worked against the remaining shows, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

IMO, what hurt daytime more than even decades of shitty writing and acting has been the utter lack of individuality within the genre. Back in the day, as they say, each soap had its' own, unique, personal identity. ATWT and GL, for example, were the more "family-driven" soaps, while GH and DAYS focused more on romance and action-adventure stories. Although just about every soap had its' share of supercouples, you could count on Y&R, let's say, giving you the kinds of stories that you weren't liable to find elsewhere. Now, though, each soap is virtually indistinguishable from the others; and all soaps are virtually rotten at the core.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

One thing that blurs the soaps identity is the soap hopper. I really resented when Tamara Braun came to DOOL. If I want to watch an ABC star I will watch an ABC soap. There were always a few who hopped around, but the shows had a core of actors who stuck with the show through thick and thin. Now, so many are hired guns and with the way the actors go from show to show (and the writers too) they all start to look alike.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree, and that's my central point. When the writing was bad, you had choices, you could move on to something else. Now? The writing is horrendous across the board and there are so few soaps, there is no where to go but cable and watching 'primetime in the daytime'. The soaperatti is incestuous and keeps claiming that it's such a 'specialty' field that no one outside of daytime can understand it (that's because they're so "speshul"). Somehow primetime and cable are surviving with infusing new blood and new ideas. As a result, the same few burned out writers are shifted from show to show. You can't get away from them trying to shove the same tired ideas at what they think is a 'new' audience.

Daytimers typically watch multiple shows, so if you didn't like a mother and daughter sleeping with the same man and beating each other up on one show, you sure as hell aren't rooting for the hack writer to bring that storyline to another show you're watching. When there were more soaps (and more writers) there were also more ideas.

The writing in daytime is awful because the same tired group of writers has nothing new to offer. They have nothing left but false self-praise and a career on a downward slide. Does anyone know if any of the currently unemployed daytime writers have found work on any successful projects? I can't imagine there are producers out there lining up to grab any of the 'elite' in daytime.

ETA:... while probably not a popular opinion, I also think a huge problem in daytime is that TIIC are have extended this ideology to hiring actors. The 'newer' actors were treated as 'speshul' too. Instead of relying on tried and true and highly skilled vets, daytime PTB decided that a small group of select newbies were the future of daytime. I won't name names, but I think we can all list at least a half dozen who are shifted from show to show along with tired/burned out writers and executive producers.

The problem is that the pretty but pointless actors weren't skilled enough to add new dimensions to their characters from show to show and on top of the same tired storylines, you had the same actors, with new names, but nothing that differentiated them from character to character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'd put the blame more on the writers than the actors. I see what you mean, but the soaps are like one big rep company though. And once you've joined in, it's difficult to break out. A double edged sword because an actor most likely wants to pursue other mediums, but at the same time, soaps have been an invaluable insurance policy for a lot of folks who tried their hands in primetime and film with little to no luck. I imagine that an actor could get bored and frustrated playing the same character for years and I can see why they might want some variety. Kathleen Noone comes to mind, not that she wasn't married to AMC's Ellen but she knew there was a specific type of role she just had to get out there and play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...
  • Members

Bring back Dysfunctional Family night, or whatever it was called. With Dynasty & all the rest. And Melrose Place. They should just ride out the last few months (years?) with old-school repeats, the way it should've been always.

Wasn't "Sisters" on their line-up when it began in 2000?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think the pre-Barnabas episodes are very underrated both for dialogue and character. They're slow but they really create a world and fill out the characters, imbuing them with heavy dimension that ultimately will have to sustain them for years as the show largely stops writing for character after it returns from 1795. What we know about them by then is what they have to power them. (I don't think the show was bad after, I actually love it in '68 and often in times after that, but it was very different.) I think the B&W episodes with Barnabas' early days are especially frightening - they terrified me as a kid - but the color stuff in '67 is also very strong, especially in the stretch where Julia is on the run, Carolyn is under Barnabas' control, and you get the sense that events have gone off the rails for the regular characters and anything goes. As a child viewer seeing it in syndication on the Sci-Fi Channel, who had no idea who lived or who died, it was a lot. Mitch Ryan is especially powerful in the early pre-Barnabas era as the sort of Byronic Burke Devlin character. You knew they had to kill him once Barnabas comes in, despite Ryan's alcohol problem making it impossible to keep him at the show - Burke dominates the first year or so as the fulcrum character, he's incredibly magnetic and charismatic. You couldn't see him becoming a dupe for Barnabas and Julia, as Anthony George's more benign, mild version briefly does before getting unceremoniously killed off. I always found Burke's offscreen plane crash death very eerie and suspicious, and I think the show does toy with the question if Barnabas' powers somehow got him on that plane and if he took it down. I had always wanted Burke to return one day, in any revival project, as a kind of vengeful power broker and puppet master, driven by Vicki's inevitable demise to get revenge on Barnabas and co. I still have Art Wallace's "Shadows on the Wall" DS bible somewhere. IIRC in the earliest versions of the plot Vicki was going to somehow be tied to the butler or his daughter - Betty Hanscomb or something. I don't remember the exact details. I do know there's all sorts of raised and dropped plotlines and characters offscreen in '66, like Ned Calder, the man they clearly intended to pair with Liz and so on. I've always found '66 very rich, but I don't begrudge the show after for it because it's still awfully well-written, specifically the early Barnabas stuff.
    • I totally agree with this, as most of you seem to. Mary Carney was at least competent and reasonably likable; I just feel like she barely had anything of substance to do before she was abruptly given the hook. And I get the backstory of Kathleen Tolan having done a play with Helen Gallagher, but...at any point did they ever actually READ her before they greenlit her? Because...OOF. First time I saw her on SoapNet was right when this GODAWFUL actress named Charity Rahmer played Belle on Days of Our Lives for all of three weeks before she was mercifully recast; her line readings were straight out of a Charlie Brown special. I remember thinking Kathleen Tolan could have played her mother! In the Frank/Jill/Delia triangle, Delia WAS the one who was cheated on, so I got why she was upset and thought it was perfectly valid in theory at least, but of course it was blown up to Wagnerian proportions including falls involving staircases and tricycles. But with Pat/Faith/Delia I had no sympathy for her...especially because it was mainly with Catherine Hicks's Faith and I really liked her.
    • I was going through those episodes from 1984 and early 1985 before they were taken down. Some of the older characters, like Don and even Tom, looked a little out of place, like they were on the wrong show. But the newer characters were fun. It's too bad they lost the character of Melissa. I guess Jennifer took her long-term place on the canvas. 
    • How I will remember him...

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • The black and white episodes of the show are very special. An atmosphere the color run loses. Dark Shadows was filmed live-on-tape. They could do a retake but it would be very expensive. I think there was a claim that if actors wanted a retake they would curse. There was also a rumor that at one point Joan Bennett accidentally said "Hollywood" instead of "Collinwood" and that necessitated a retake.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      Angela Lansbury stars as Jessica Fletcher in one of the longest-running and most beloved TV series of all-time, Murder, She Wrote. Set in Cabot Cove, Maine, Jessica is a mystery writer and amateur detective who is quick to outwit both criminals and the police when it comes to solving a murder. Winner of 4 Golden Globes and nominated for 12 consecutive Primetime Emmy Awards for Best Actress in a Drama, the series showcases unforgettable guest stars including Tom Bosely, George Clooney, Shirley Jones, Courteney Cox, Leslie Nielsen, Mickey Rooney, Tom Selleck, John Amos, Dorothy Lamour, Cyd Charrise and many more. In Murder, She Wrote: The Complete Series, help Jessica get to the bottom of every crime she encounters in this completely remastered collection featuring all 264 episodes, 4 TV movies, and bonus features. Special Features: "Novel Connection" (Crossover Episode of Magnum P.I.); The Great 80's TV Flashback; Origin of a Series; Recipe for a Hit; America's Top Sleuths; The Perils of Success
    • Loved this IG post from Ambyr about how she and Trisha work together. You can tell these ladies go above and beyond the script, and that they really trust and enjoy working together. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DJpJufFPOQ2/?igsh=MXBmcWs0YzIwaXVhNA==  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • It is a shame that more characters didn't go the ATWT-Barbara route and make the ingénue into an antagonist. Sort of like they did with Liza/Hogan/Sunny, less successfully. It is a credit to ATWT's creativity that breathed life in that character for years after she was fighting off bulls in Spain.  But, a character like Liza can only have so many true loves and high jinks on the high seas.  They need another reason to be in the story. Liza's wealth, as well as her acumen to see through fraud, was fertile ground for tons of stories.  But, I feel like the business stories for Liza were always about her being easily overwhelmed, rather than exploring things like her leadership and managerial skills.
    • STFU!! Dante!!! This nonsense of blaming Gio is just ridiculous! Alexis and Lucky are becoming so unlikable. Why are the writers writing these characters so poorly?
    • Keith still comes off younger to me. I thought he wasn't that bad for his first day.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy