Jump to content

Duchess Cash Claims


Sylph

Recommended Posts

  • Members

The problem with Fergie is that she is incapable of taking care of her finances. She is enamoured by money and works very hard to try and get some without actually working for it. And don't even mention her "charity work" -- she is thisclose to getting in trouble over allocation of those funds, too.

The Queen needs to give her a lump sum but tie it up in a trust where it can accrue interest and disburse a fixed amount every month, enough for her to stay afloat, live relatively comfortably. The problem may be that she doesn't just want to live comfortably, she wants a jetset lifestyle. Right now she's piggybacking on her daughters' entry into "society" but how long are they and their rich boyfriends going to put up with "mummy wants to come along to Phuket, too"?

Not surprised she's not invited to the wedding. She was barely tolerated at Diana's funeral. Am I right in hearing that Prince Charles's wife Camilla has been disinvited from the wedding, too? That cannot be right. Whatever one may think of Camilla, she is William's stepmother and wife to the heir to the throne.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Why wouldn't Camilla be invited? She's not only Charles' wife and William's stepmother...but she's well liked by the whole family, including William and Harry. It's nonsense, she'll be there!

And Cat, you've got it right. The Queen needs to set Fergie up with a trust fund and banish her to Monaco where she can hang with her jet set friends, enjoy the Mediterranean lifestyle and generally stay out of HM's hair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

I don't think she is an inherently evil person... just not very smart. And fundamentally work-shy.

See, this is somebody who grew up in the royal circle (her father bred horses for the Queen or something). And royals and their hangers-on are notoriously lazy. Well, the Queen plows through her duties without any real emotion or relish and Prince Chuck is totally devoted to the causes he loves. Before she married, Diana shared and paid rent on a tiny flat while working as a kindergarten assistant AND daytime nanny to the children of Rosa Monckton. OK, it's not construction work but it is a full-time job and quite an active one.

But many others are annoyed when they have to leave their paid-for manor houses to go to the opening of a children's ward. It's, like, such a trial, darling.

At the time when Fergie was growing up (1970s), people in the royal circle had a pretty cushy life. Britain's class system was very entrenched and "who you knew" could get you places. People were more in awe of those associated with royalty. The assumption for women of Fergie's class and generation was that they would leave school at 16 with the flimsiest of qualifications, be a chalet girl in Switzerland for a season or two, do some skiing and horse-riding and look for a wealthy hubby who might be involved with polo or something. Fergie was a chalet girl for a couple of years, then fell in with Prince Andrew.

Only she effed up. And got caught doing so (financial advisors will forever be known in Britain as "toe suckers" thanks to the Duchess). Which kind of sucks for her. Except that she is so used to spending gobs of money which really isn't hers and so UNUSED to actually working to acquire money that the only thing she feels she can do is scam/beg/borrow money. It's really sad that, for all the £££ she spent on psychotherapy and healing crystals and the like, this "easy way out" attitude of hers was never addressed. Instead, we got a lot of stuff about her mom leaving her and her siblings when they were kids... or her battle with her weight... and while one can sympathize with these traumas, they have been used first and foremost to cast the Duchess in the role of victim. And when that happens, it is very easy to conclude that "it's not my fault. It's NEVER my fault."

And Britain has changed in the sense that it will never be unquestioningly, unfailing in awe of royalty anymore. When times are tough and people who have the willingness and werewithall to work cannot do so, they become even less sympathetic to Fergie's plight. She may be humiliated publicly. But this woman is not starving in some rat-infested hole somewhere. She lives a fairly comfortable life. She just wants it to be even more comfortable.

And Prince Andrew... LOL, where to start with this arrogant freeloader? The man who has charmed and smarmed his way into a bogus job where he "promotes trade" with the UK in places like Mauritius, St. Barts and Phuket, LOL. Because St. Barts is WAY crucial to the UK's trade accounts.

Before I end the rant, I just want to say I am not some knee-jerk anti-royalist. I know it must seem so, but I'm not. I do judge individual by individual, though, and both Fergie and Andrew come up lacking, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

£249,000? That's US$404,127 a year. Wish I was making that amount of money!

*Snort* @ Randy Andy spending £154,000 on hotels, food and "hospitality." Yeah, that's a euphemism for exactly what you think it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You are indignant and incredulous? Well, so are many others. I keep reading and seeing people calling for the UK to become a republic. And going full-force against the royals. Apparently, the Duke apologized, but many aren't buying it, because he and that Epstein guy were partying in the Sunshine State etc. Reportedly. And there were a lot of young women involved. If I got that correctly. :unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Correction. Young underage women. The man he was with has been accused of the most egregious crimes against young girls. The Palace swears that even though Prince Andrew was "there," he wasn't involved in any of the "special parties." Unfortunately, PA's sketchy reputation proceeds him and I do not believe the Palace's claim for one instant.

And I'm still envious about Fergies £249,000. It is so hard to put material concerns behind you when living costs are so exorbitant here, LOL. If I got that as an annual salary, I'd be able to buy a place. Maybe even something with two bedrooms! Luxury. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Gosh, Sylph, I don't know. I think PA's faults are that he is arrogant, rude and hangs out with dodgy oligarchs and other squillionaires (the article you posted quotes Goga Ashkenazi who, if I recall correctly, is Saif Gaddifi's gf). He also does like the ladies. What Epstein did, though, is in another realm entirely and frankly sickening to read.

LOL at Whitehall officials privately expressing that they would "shed no tears" if Prince Andrew were to leave his post as British envoy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy