Jump to content

GH: MICHAEL RECAST


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 197
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I agree, but if they want to take the character in a new less psycho direction. They could have wanted a face change to go with the attitude change. So people didn't look at Michael and remember how awful he really is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, I don't believe that DG's fugliness caused his ouster. Guza does what he wants. He turned ugly as dirt BA into a romantic leading man. I don't buy it for a second that he cared what OriginalMichael looked like. I am convinced that something happened behind the scenes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Whenever I see this Michael all I see is the brat who almost beat up Robin and Liz and went on to murder Claudia. Even with all the weird attempts at a "sibling" bond with Kristina, I cringe any time he's around women.

I don't know if that will change with the recast but I can see where it may have factored into the decision, especially if someone at ABC is finally starting to question whether the show can continue to revolve around cold and unpleasant men who show women their love by abusing them or ignoring them.

I guess we'll see if the writing for Michael changes. I remember when Tyler Christopher left for his failed primetime career and they had Coltin Scott's Nik dancing around with a mop to show us that he was going to be a new type of Nikolas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I buy the possibility of the report's validity, though I don't necessarily buy the report. What I mean is, yes, I can see an exec finding Duell to be more conventionally attractive to teen girls. I think Garrett's look has always been far more unique and real in the tradition of GH's best youth casting, whereas Chad Duell seems handsome but bland, cookie-cutter. He looks like a product of the Disney assembly line in most pictures and video, I think the one above is a fluke. I can definitely see ABC finding him more marketable.

As for Disney/ABC forcing hunks onto the shows, it has happened before. Linda Gottlieb eventually left OLTL over interference from above, specifically things like being forced to add hottie of the year Casper Van Dien as Ty Moody, and the Kevin recast merry-go-round, which ultimately led to hot model/non-actor Ken Kenitzer, who lasted about twenty seconds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

SID: Fired actor speaks out. DG said he went to work, did his scenes and had a meeting with JFP at the end of the day & he was informed "they were going in a different direction & that direction would not include myself"

"It didn't feel real." When he told people they thought he was joking. He's never been fired from a job before.

According to set insiders, MB was not happy. DG said "he assured me it was not about my talent, or my acting abilities & encouraged me to refocus and move on."

"I'm going to move on. I know I did the best I could. I have no regrets & no guilt" he says, adding that despite wild speculation about the "real" reason - conflict with directors - is not true.

"There was no conflict. I'm pleased with the experience. It's bittersweet. I would like to hope it's more sweet then bitter. I will miss playing Michael. Who wouldn't want to be Sonny's son?"

"I wish the next guy the best"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That totally came from above JFP and Guza's head. From the way he sounds in that interview, everyone was totally blindsighted.

I still believe Guza and JFP knew ahead of time and wanted to ease the transition, which is why they stuck Michael on the island.

I think they should have at least allowed Drew to finish his story and sent him off for a month before they brought him back.

I hope he gets his well deserved Emmy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This "taking the character in a new direction" crap is such bs! How many times have they done that with the original actor? We are constantly questioning a character's actions and stating that there is no way that particular character would act that way or do something. Look at John Z, is he the same character he was when he first came on the show? He's hardly recognizable. And why wouldn't the son of a mobster act the way Drew was directed to act? That would only make sense. Someone who was raised the way Michael was certainly couldn't be "normal". :rolleyes:

I'm just not buying it. :mad:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • My comment has nothing to do with cast resentment, but does relate to the Finland location shoot: It may be a coincidence, but Jim Matthews died in Finland in 1982.  Hugh Marlowe's final episode was in April 1982, but the character probably didn't die untll May or June. (I'm unable to find the character's date of death, only the date of Marlowe's final episode). SInce Jim and Rachel had very little interaction after around 1975, it is unlikely Jim's death in Finland had any connection to Rachel's potential visit, but the choice to have Jim die in that location at that time is a head-scratcher.  I'm sure the writers sent Jim on an extended trip (and off-screen) because of Marlowe's illness.  But Finland seems like a strange choice considering the (then) recently cancelled location shoot.  
    • I totally understand your sloths concern about it and I agree with you. Let’s hope the show plays it’s cards right.    Further comments about the last few episodes: - I liked that one of the attendees was filming the scene. That’s realistic. I wonder if the writers will follow up with that.  - Martin and Smitty trying to drag Leslie out was very heteronormative, so perfectly in line with them two as characters lol.    As for the future: it’s obvious the Duprees will come to accept Eva one way or another, but the rivalry with Kay should be here for the long term   On the topic of acting: the only bad actors I’m seeing are Ted and Derek. Tomas hasn’t proven to be either good or bad, so far, but he’s certainly mediocre and uncharismatic. He sucks the energy out of the scenes and I don’t see any couple of women ever vying for him. 
    • I’m trying to think which actors VW were working with at the time, and none of them had been there for a while. Even like Mac and Ada didn’t have that big of a part in Rachel’s storyline.  And Jamie was involved with all that movie stuff.
    • Brooke did ads before ATWT too. That probably helped get her the job. After ATWT she seemed to branch more into hosting, along with ads.  I think I saw Kelley in an ad or two, but you're right she wasn't on as much. 
    •   Thanks for sharing these. I wonder if Charles might have been in the running for Adam. I know Preacher was a bit of a bad boy at times on EON, but Neal seemed to be a step down, and Robert Lupone had played a similar part on AMC. Given the huge cast turnover at this point I wonder who thought they had been there long enough to go.  Laura Malone/Chris Rich would get a remote within the next year. 
    • Interesting.  It seems to allude to that statement that Warren Burton made around that time about some AW actors getting special treatment.  I wonder who was resentful about not getting to go. 
    • Good morning, boys!  I figured that it was time that our Gio was introduced into the hotness thread

      Please register in order to view this content

      @ranger1rg I even included a close up of his face for ya!
    • Under all of Madonna's social media today there is this wave of negative, toxic, absurd comments by Lady Gaga fans telling her how Gaga surpassed her in concert in Copacabana. I mean... Who the hell cares? Why are these fan communities so freaking toxic??? I'm sure Madonna doesn't care... But still. Have some respect for M. Leave her social media alone. Go cheer Gaga and be happy. Why come and spew hate on M??? Crazy world.
    • FYI, again, Ruth/Letitia is not in either of these 2 episodes. So that concludes the 4 episodes I had from Nov. 1983. I don't have the October episodes.
    • Eddie has begun uploading the 1990 episodes. I'm so happy about that. I was mindfully taking a break till there's plenty of episodes I can binge watch when I feel like it. Now that 1989 is complete... I can't wait to press play on February 1989 and resume where I left off.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy