Jump to content

AMC: Actress not returning!!


Recommended Posts

  • Members

AMC and GH's insistence on featuring their highest paid actors over their guarantees is the likely the reason they are scrambling behind the scenes to make production cuts. I'll never understand why they refuse to balance out the airtime if only to save their budget.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Exactly. Think over the span of 7 years how much they've spent paying out vets' contracts with them being WAY under their guarantees.

Julia Barr for example I am sure had somewhere around 100 episode guarantee.... since Frons came aboard, I think the highest episode count in a year she got was maybe 60?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was never a big Kendall fan, SMG or AM version, due to her origin and the handling of that when the character first came around. I'll probably take some heat for this, but I never liked the idea that AMC played that Erica had to love Kendall because she gave birth to her. That just left a sour taste in my mouth. While I came to respect that Erica was able to love her as her daughter, I always felt like there was this air of "as soon as you don't treat me right, I'm going to throw my origins back in your face" and I never liked it.

I think AM grew a lot as an actress while she was on the show, and that she brought something really different to Kendall. Once they bogged her down with Zach, and literally took them both to hell and back in the name of their "true (twist) love" I stopped caring in general.

I don't think AMC is going to miss AM or Kendall nearly as much as some thing. I do wish Alicia all the best in life and her career. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Agreeded, Kylie. While I think I enjoyed the Kendall/Erica story more than you did, it always rang very false with me to have Erica and Kendall so close as mother and daughter. It felt somewhat forced. I always preferred them at odds...... Overall I enjoyed the original Kendall played by SMG, but Minshew was able to put a definitive stamp on the role (if not only for the fact she played the role for 8 years almost). As I have said though, Kendall post Zach is a Kendall I really could have done without. They did more damage to the long term future of this show than they HELPED in the short term. I think AMC will be just fine without her.

As JackPeyton also pointed out, the show was kidding themselves the majority of the time trying to make Alicia a leading actress... She was perfectly sufficient as a supporting role (the reason why that's the only emmy nomination she could get) She wasn't an AWFUL actress, but she certainly wasn't leading lady material.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

When AM first joined the show, it was a bit odd how Erica had orchestrated that whole slapping her across the face thing, and then was all tender to her in private... I know they buried the hatchet when SMG's Kendall left town with Del (a tearful SMG: "My mother forgives me..."), but I don't recall nary a mention or any sort of indication that Erica maintained a relationship with Kendall during those years she was off the show. Relationships need more than a goodbye "You're forgiven" scene for things to be copacetic after seven years with no relationship. I didn't really mind it, and I'm not saying that Erica and Kendall were all hunky dory, but it was still a little weird.

I like AM, there are some little actor quirks of hers that bug me like the stammering, but as Kendall became a more sympathetic character during her run, I must say she was missing that special element that made SMG's Kendall so enjoyable for me. SMG just struck me as being a very precocious bordering on annoying child actor type back then, I used to watch her on Swans Crossing. Her Kendall could be so earnest and a little OTT, she was ALWAYS setting herself up to get her feelings hurt and there was just something compelling about that kind of broken young girl who you felt a *little* sorry for but took so much joy in seeing things blow up in her face.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I will definitely miss Alicia, she's been a huge part of the AMC cast for the last eight years, but I definitely saw this coming. I was hoping to get her back by summer, but wasn't meant to be. I will miss her. Just hope they open the door for her return in the future (that means: don't recast or kill the character!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So much for AM not returning LOL:

http://www.soapoperadigest.com/news/breaking/

Zach and Kendall Return to AMC!

Alicia Minshew, who is currently on an extended maternity leave from AMC after giving birth to daughter Willow last November, and Thorsten Kaye, who opted not to continue on AMC as Zach in the wake of the show's move from New York to Los Angeles, are making a short-term return to Pine Valley. She will first air on April 9; his first air date is April 13. Minshew tells Digest, "I don't know what the story holds for Zach and Kendall other than that they come back happy and together. I think these episodes will be more about Kendall dealing with Greenlee, who knows that Kendall slept with Ryan and knows that Kendall ran her off the road! So, there's plenty of drama there, and I can't wait!" The actress reports that she agreed to fly out to L.A. to tape these shows when AMC EP Julie Hanan Carruthers agreed to fly out her baby and husband, as well, and that Kaye surprised her by agreeing to join her. "He said, 'If you go, I'll go!' I've been seeing him all the time — I saw him yesterday, in fact — but the chance to do scenes with him again ... I couldn't be more excited."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks for posting.

I never thought that a short-term visit was out of the question (not sure if anyone did). But I actually think it will be great stuff to see play out what Minshew says is the reason for the return, which is Greenlee confronting Kendall about repeatedly boinking Ryan :excl: only a couple of weeks after she ran Greenlee off the road. :excl::excl:

That's the kind of gold I live for with these shows! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Um, not to break the spirit of people reading this, but I'm pretty sure they're only coming back because they legally have to. The LA credits indicate Kaye's contract has not ran out yet, and we know Minshew is still with the show, so maybe they'd get sued if they didn't appear for their filming dates? LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I was talking about 1986, but the glimpses of 1982 are about the same. 
    • I skimmed some of the 1982 synopses; Steve was planning on an opening an office in Finland, and I think Jim went there as part of the preparation. That probably was a big issue; AW had already gone to San Diego that year, with Rachel/Steve/Mitch. And to upstate NY with Pete and Diana. I wonder if upstate was as expensive lol  AW in 1982 has always fascinated me, because of how messy it was 
    • That makes sense. What a messy time for the show. And any changes they made were mostly for the worse.
    • The transition from Neal to Adam was very abrupt, and to be honest my theory is that the character of Neal was designed so that we think he is super shady but then it turns out that he was on the side of good all along so Neal could have seamlessly become a hero of the BCPD with no need for Adam. I don't know whether Robert Lupone was hired on a short contract or if he was fired from a longer-term contract because they decided they wanted someone who was more of a leading man type, but I can imagine a scenario where Charles Grant did both the undercover Egyptian treasure/flirt with Victoria and the straighter-arrow day to day police investigation. But in my imagined scenario the MJ prostitution plotline probably doesn't exist and instead he probably continues a relationship with Victoria. The story seems very odd to me. I assume that David Canary would have been included only because a plotline where Steve is going to Finland in which only Rachel is seen in actual Finland seems unlikely. The synopses explicitly mention that Alice can't go with Steve but would whoever was playing Alice at that time have had the kind of clout to get the remote cancelled? It also strikes me as unlikely that production would have approved the expensive location shoot and *then* cancelled it only because of jealousy. It seems more likely that they rejected it because of the expense but then the jealousy part got added to the gossip speculatively, possibly because while it was being worked out they justified not including more castmembers because of the expense. 
    • My comment has nothing to do with cast resentment, but does relate to the Finland location shoot: It may be a coincidence, but Jim Matthews died in Finland in 1982.  Hugh Marlowe's final episode was in April 1982, but the character probably didn't die untll May or June. (I'm unable to find the character's date of death, only the date of Marlowe's final episode). SInce Jim and Rachel had very little interaction after around 1975, it is unlikely Jim's death in Finland had any connection to Rachel's potential visit, but the choice to have Jim die in that location at that time is a head-scratcher.  I'm sure the writers sent Jim on an extended trip (and off-screen) because of Marlowe's illness.  But Finland seems like a strange choice considering the (then) recently cancelled location shoot.  
    • I totally understand your sloths concern about it and I agree with you. Let’s hope the show plays it’s cards right.    Further comments about the last few episodes: - I liked that one of the attendees was filming the scene. That’s realistic. I wonder if the writers will follow up with that.  - Martin and Smitty trying to drag Leslie out was very heteronormative, so perfectly in line with them two as characters lol.    As for the future: it’s obvious the Duprees will come to accept Eva one way or another, but the rivalry with Kay should be here for the long term   On the topic of acting: the only bad actors I’m seeing are Ted and Derek. Tomas hasn’t proven to be either good or bad, so far, but he’s certainly mediocre and uncharismatic. He sucks the energy out of the scenes and I don’t see any couple of women ever vying for him. 
    • I’m trying to think which actors VW were working with at the time, and none of them had been there for a while. Even like Mac and Ada didn’t have that big of a part in Rachel’s storyline.  And Jamie was involved with all that movie stuff.
    • Brooke did ads before ATWT too. That probably helped get her the job. After ATWT she seemed to branch more into hosting, along with ads.  I think I saw Kelley in an ad or two, but you're right she wasn't on as much. 
    •   Thanks for sharing these. I wonder if Charles might have been in the running for Adam. I know Preacher was a bit of a bad boy at times on EON, but Neal seemed to be a step down, and Robert Lupone had played a similar part on AMC. Given the huge cast turnover at this point I wonder who thought they had been there long enough to go.  Laura Malone/Chris Rich would get a remote within the next year. 
    • Interesting.  It seems to allude to that statement that Warren Burton made around that time about some AW actors getting special treatment.  I wonder who was resentful about not getting to go. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy