Jump to content

AMC: Actress not returning!!


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Good riddance. I mean I still respect Alicia Minshew, but the character of Kendall really serves no purpose anymore. I for one welcome this news. A Kendall-free AMC is an AMC I am perfectly okay with. Pales in comparison to the loss of David Canary. The show can get over this one, the other... not so sure.

Zendall no more :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Zendall can sail off into the sunset with their oddly-named children (I'm sure we'll hear about a daughter called RedWings born to them somewhere down the line) and their love story will have the happy ending Zendall's fans long for. In the meantime, the fact that both Kaye and Minshew are not returning to AMC completely liberates the show and allows them to play a more ensemble cast. David Canary's retirement, by contrast with Minshew's, is a huge blow. And I still get anxious and nervous whenever Cam Mathieson and Rebecca Budig appear for long stretches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I totally agree with your post, Cat.

This show has been held hostage by Zach and Kendall and their counterparts for the better part of the last 5 years. Its one of the many reasons this show and others have failed. The over reliance on a select group of characters after a while suffocates the rest of the show.

Zach and Kendall were very interesting and refreshing in the beginning, but there is such a thing as too much of a good thing. The writers got caught up in trying to centre the show around this popular pairing and forgot about everyone else. Even in a coma this shrew (Kendall) was in our face daily.

Its a blessing. As far as I am concerned the REAL Kendall has been gone for quite sometime. When I look back on Minshew's run, I will remember fondly her first 3.5 years, everything after that... yeah I would rather forget it.

It is in no way Lish's fault, but if her leaving means the character of Kendall leaves too.... then BRING IT ON.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

ITA. Zendall were popular and the fanbase was vocal and well-organized. So the order came from Frons to feature the pairing as often as possible. It degenerated from there with ridiculous plots and comas, to the point where I actively rooted for Annie to bring down her bullies Greenlee and Zendall! I suspect it was this over-exposure fatigue which prompted TK and AM to decide to leave the show, too.

The intense focus on anything Zendall (and Kendall) said and did, IMO, triggered the steady erosion in AMC's audience over the past few years. Even if you adore cheesecake, you can't have it every single day for years on end!

There could be an initial shock/drop as Zendall's core fanbase reacts to their departure from the show. However, AMC have been laying the groundwork for this departure for a long while now, and half the time when I tune in, I forget they are even on the show. Honestly, I think this is the best thing for AMC right now. I'd even say this may save its ratings over the medium-term if the HWs get their asses in gear. Kind of like when Days had to let go of John & Marlena and others in order to cut the fat and refocus the show on long-neglected others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Has this "news" been confirmed anywhere? If not, aren't we jumping the gun a little? Minshew has told people on one of her message boards more than once that she is returning following an extended maternity leave. I know things can change, but I'm not taking one unconfirmed report that seriously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No, I agree, I was just commenting on the reality of the situation... I don't think AM fans should assume that she owns the role and that AMC would *scoff* NEVER recast. I brought up SMG as a hypothetical for that very reason, the show is struggling (it'll struggle even more with DC's departure), so I'm prepared for them to at least try to pull out some major stops.

They have made so much of Erica's life about her children and her *children's children* in recent years which has, a. given her new and less self-involved material, and b. ensured her longevity on the show by making her a "relevant" matriarch who doesn't have to rely on solo "I am Erica Kane"-type storylines. Now she's back to wingin' it on her own and the show must find its way back to writing Erica for Erica, which we'd moved from with the presence of Bianca, Kendall, and their children in her life. If they lose Lucci, they know it's time to hang it up. Salary schmalary, say what you want, but NO, they simply DO NOT want her to go even if her (reduced) pay is still a nice chunk of the budget. They are going to want Bianca and Kendall back to keep Erica relevant and to make Susan's commute and future with the show worth it. You can only do but so much Jack crap, and frankly put, Erica is no longer the Erica of 1983. She's still a bad bitch :rolleyes: but she's changed, and she's going to need those kids around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I was talking about 1986, but the glimpses of 1982 are about the same. 
    • I skimmed some of the 1982 synopses; Steve was planning on an opening an office in Finland, and I think Jim went there as part of the preparation. That probably was a big issue; AW had already gone to San Diego that year, with Rachel/Steve/Mitch. And to upstate NY with Pete and Diana. I wonder if upstate was as expensive lol  AW in 1982 has always fascinated me, because of how messy it was 
    • That makes sense. What a messy time for the show. And any changes they made were mostly for the worse.
    • The transition from Neal to Adam was very abrupt, and to be honest my theory is that the character of Neal was designed so that we think he is super shady but then it turns out that he was on the side of good all along so Neal could have seamlessly become a hero of the BCPD with no need for Adam. I don't know whether Robert Lupone was hired on a short contract or if he was fired from a longer-term contract because they decided they wanted someone who was more of a leading man type, but I can imagine a scenario where Charles Grant did both the undercover Egyptian treasure/flirt with Victoria and the straighter-arrow day to day police investigation. But in my imagined scenario the MJ prostitution plotline probably doesn't exist and instead he probably continues a relationship with Victoria. The story seems very odd to me. I assume that David Canary would have been included only because a plotline where Steve is going to Finland in which only Rachel is seen in actual Finland seems unlikely. The synopses explicitly mention that Alice can't go with Steve but would whoever was playing Alice at that time have had the kind of clout to get the remote cancelled? It also strikes me as unlikely that production would have approved the expensive location shoot and *then* cancelled it only because of jealousy. It seems more likely that they rejected it because of the expense but then the jealousy part got added to the gossip speculatively, possibly because while it was being worked out they justified not including more castmembers because of the expense. 
    • My comment has nothing to do with cast resentment, but does relate to the Finland location shoot: It may be a coincidence, but Jim Matthews died in Finland in 1982.  Hugh Marlowe's final episode was in April 1982, but the character probably didn't die untll May or June. (I'm unable to find the character's date of death, only the date of Marlowe's final episode). SInce Jim and Rachel had very little interaction after around 1975, it is unlikely Jim's death in Finland had any connection to Rachel's potential visit, but the choice to have Jim die in that location at that time is a head-scratcher.  I'm sure the writers sent Jim on an extended trip (and off-screen) because of Marlowe's illness.  But Finland seems like a strange choice considering the (then) recently cancelled location shoot.  
    • I totally understand your sloths concern about it and I agree with you. Let’s hope the show plays it’s cards right.    Further comments about the last few episodes: - I liked that one of the attendees was filming the scene. That’s realistic. I wonder if the writers will follow up with that.  - Martin and Smitty trying to drag Leslie out was very heteronormative, so perfectly in line with them two as characters lol.    As for the future: it’s obvious the Duprees will come to accept Eva one way or another, but the rivalry with Kay should be here for the long term   On the topic of acting: the only bad actors I’m seeing are Ted and Derek. Tomas hasn’t proven to be either good or bad, so far, but he’s certainly mediocre and uncharismatic. He sucks the energy out of the scenes and I don’t see any couple of women ever vying for him. 
    • I’m trying to think which actors VW were working with at the time, and none of them had been there for a while. Even like Mac and Ada didn’t have that big of a part in Rachel’s storyline.  And Jamie was involved with all that movie stuff.
    • Brooke did ads before ATWT too. That probably helped get her the job. After ATWT she seemed to branch more into hosting, along with ads.  I think I saw Kelley in an ad or two, but you're right she wasn't on as much. 
    •   Thanks for sharing these. I wonder if Charles might have been in the running for Adam. I know Preacher was a bit of a bad boy at times on EON, but Neal seemed to be a step down, and Robert Lupone had played a similar part on AMC. Given the huge cast turnover at this point I wonder who thought they had been there long enough to go.  Laura Malone/Chris Rich would get a remote within the next year. 
    • Interesting.  It seems to allude to that statement that Warren Burton made around that time about some AW actors getting special treatment.  I wonder who was resentful about not getting to go. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy