Jump to content

AMC: Actor to depart


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Well I am glad official "word" came from David Canary himself about this. I am excited to see him finish off his stint hand in hand with Julia Barr. I just hope its done right, and not 100% dealing with this long lost son business being discussed in another spoiler thread. Its all been said before, but Bravo David Canary and thank you for 27 years of daytime acting at its finest. No one can fill your's or Adam Chandler's shoes.

It will be fun to see Annie go down, she never belonged in that house anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Only if he's recast.

But forget all that. I actually think that statement sounds very much like DC: classy, generous and positive to a fault. I wish there was something fans could do as a thank you to him. A charity we could give to in his honor or a web page where we could post statements and memories.

Hmmm....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I really think Jacob Young can do it. I just think the show needs to get rid of Eunissa, first. She's whats holding him back. I'm tired of watching this whiney, sloth JR. I know he has cancer, but Marissa is making him EXTRA boring and is dragging him down! No way would JR be as bland as this, if Boreissa weren't in the equation at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There was once upon a time I would have had faith in Jacob Young to take such a lead role, but that's gone now. He's been phoning it in for a while now...

The Chandler family IMO will be dead with David Canary/Adam gone. Something that could save it or at least keep it going would be to bring back Skye/Robin Christopher. She is the most Adam like. I'd love to see Skye come in and run Chandler Enterprises.... love to see her and Annie face off.

Sadly, either Robin has washed her hands of ABC... or ABC has washed their hands of her....

I don't blame her, but what the hell is wrong with them? Robin Christopher was wasted for the last few years of her GH run, her OLTL run was a complete waste of time. ABC, BRING SKYE HOME!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

All the soaps are racist. The problem is your definition only applies to a single actress, and certainly not Daphnee Duplaix. If she was still there, you'd still be calling it the most racist soap on television for not employing America's favorite backup singer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm glad that David put out a farewell statement. He has lots of fans would will appreciate it. I am very pleased that Adam gets a happy ending. However, I doubt we will see him again other than in AMC's final episode in a couple years.

I think that JR as the Chandler patriarch can rejuvenate the character providing he divorces Marissa. JR was following in Adam's shoes very nicely up until Babe came along and ruined him. Jacob Young can play ruthless with vulnerability. He just needs to regain his enthusiasm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I agree.  Rena doesn't seem to mind the lighter workload and seems happy though. Strangely, a lot of the veteran cast are without viable love interests-Sonny, Nina, Lois, Jason, Tracy, Alexis, Carly (Brennan doesn't count).  The show lacks serious interest in romance.
    • I just can't wait until next week when we can go back to a full weeks worth of episodes. 3 episodes and a mid-week gap has been so difficult to deal with, especially in light of how good the show is.
    • I always hoped they'd change Parker's paternity back to Phillip.  I guess it doesn't matter since Chloe is off the show currently.  I don't recall Holly or Maggie mentioning Parker, so it's not they are close to him. 
    • I’ve reached the summer of 1998.  Until now, my impression has been that the show has steadily improved since the great quality dip of 1994, reaching as high as 8/10 in 1997. Sure, I could complain about a few things in 1997 (Claudia got wasted after her initial storyline; Thorne’s feelings for Taylor were a bit too sudden; the storyline where Sheila lived with James and Maggie while pregnant got rather boring; Mike periodically revisiting Sheila despite being on the run from authorities), but overall it was a very strong year.  I liked the Thorne/Taylor/Ridge triangle, the mystery plot about who shot Grant, the sham wedding to trap Sheila, Stephanie/Eric/Lauren, and Clarke manipulating his way back to working at Forrester. I even liked the Greenland storyline with Eric/Lauren/Rush, although I had expected to hate it. Maybe 1996 tops 1997 in raw soapy excitement (especially as Sheila got a chance to interact with a larger canvas of characters), but certain problems with overall storyline cohesion puts it somewhat below 1997 for me. Unfortunately, 1998 has turned out to be a bit of a speedbump, perhaps on par with 1995 levels of quality: - Maggie’s character really got trashed after James left her to be with Sheila, and the early 1998 storylines where she imprisoned Sheila in the house from Psycho, or installed those wires and mikes and such in her house to make her think she’s going crazy, were total GARBAGE. So much so that the latter storyline (and Maggie with it) pretty much disappeared into a limbo.  - I have mixed feelings about the twins plotline with Lauren. No way did Rush survive being shot with a crossbow through the chest, and the romance between Lauren and Rush’s good twin brother Johnny was rather dry to me. I did however enjoy the camp aspect of Rush taking his brother’s place to be with Lauren, and Eric rescuing her. But it doesn’t appear like Bell cared too much about the Johnny/Lauren romance beyond the twin storyline gimmick, and it too disappeared in an unsatisfactory manner (come on, why not hire Johnny’s actor for just 5 more episodes for an arc where he realizes Lauren is not over Eric, or JUST SOMETHING?) - Clarke wormed his way back to FC in late 1997, which had exciting storytelling potential, but then he disappeared almost entirely. Sad to see my favorite character wasted in this manner. Does he get anything interesting to do between now and the Morgan saga of 2000-2001? - The Thomas saga was entertaining in 1997, but it got stretched out too much, and made some of early 1998 tiresome, with Ridge having to decide YET AGAIN which woman he wants to be with. On the plus side, I like the plotline of Thorne being neighbors with Macy and Grant, and we’ve finally been introduced to the SORASed Rick/Amber/CJ crowd. The Stephanie/James/Sheila triangle is also starting, and it makes me excited (I remember seeing some if it in my childhood). I know Sheila, Grant, and James are all leaving soon, which I honestly kind of dread - between them and Clarke’s near-absence, it feels like herd is going to get culled too much in the near future. But I know there’s the familiar 1999-2002 to look forward to.
    • LOL - this is a perfect description, and that's what I loved about it! May be a bit campy, but it immediately caught my attention in a good way.  I'm not familiar with the Fishing Trip storyline, I'll have to look that up. I've noticed that about Josh, which has made him less attractive to me overall. He just yells a lot when he's not happy. Wow, Reva was married to HB!  LOL - "Always... eventually, and again"
    • I love your ideas. I would love to see Jack grown up this confused unhinged individual. He should hold a grudge against both Brooke and Taylor.   
    • @chrisml

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Lois's return has been a bust. So disappointing that the writers have never written for her. As with Tracy, the pool of GH vets is so thin, there's no one to pair her with. Doubtful they would go to the trouble of properly recasting a legacy character and then sticking  him with Lois; they're obviously not that invested. If she wants to be on this show, it'll be as a noisy grandma who stays in the background. 
    • I love me some Anita and TT. They need to give her a good storyline and I know that it's coming. 
    • @Franko Thanks for tagging me. A few days ago I was talking in another thread about the rise of "snarky" critics for TV shows in the '90s online recaps, but this is just more along the lines of a mauling. There's also the unspoken reality that films like Steel Magnolias were seen as movies for women, so therefore they sucked. Pauline Kael also had her share of blunt, at times incredibly nasty remarks, but the vitriol is often balanced by her love for film. I'm not seeing that here.  With that said, the comment about Field's work becoming unbearable describes how I felt when I tried to sit through her and Maura Tierney on ER. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy