Jump to content

Y&R: Episode Discussion for the week December 28


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 288
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Look here, why don't you just cool your damn jets. Your immaturity is showing. I've certainly not been pleased with this show by any means lately... but I can keep perspective and admit when something works, and then also call it out when something don't. Scryber's point was totally accurate. When Adam was in jail, he was injecting his eyes (Wasn't it botox?) and was virtually totally blind. When he got out, he still injected for a while (Remember him hiding the syringe box under the bed?) an then, when he finally stopped, SOME of his vision returned, but not all of it. So now he is left with this tunnel vision. And this thing DOES exist... people with Glaucoma have it. So this is one thing the show has not screwed up on. Why don't you just pull your soiled panties out of the crack of your ass and get over the fact that not EVERY SINGLE thing this show does is wrong?

Now... back to the GOOD STUFF. What Posessed the wardrobe people to put Jess in something PRETTY for once? I LOVED her Emerald green outfit the last couple days, it's about time she quit dressing like a frumpy housewife!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought the green dress was too 80's for Jill, those sequins. :lol:

I don't know what's happened to Jill's wardrobe over the past 8 years or so, she went from being one of the most stylish women on the show, to being dressed as if she buys everything from bargain bins.

Hell, I'd like to know what happened to the wardrobe department at this show overall, the characters on OLTL are dressed much better, and I know they don't have the budget Y&R has...

B&B, a soap set in the fashion world mind you, also has some appalling taste in wardrobe, IMO...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ummmm...when we were told that some of his vision returned??? Cause I missed that memo....lol... Adam's non blindness..blindness doesnt wash with me. He was worse off during the gaslighting of Ashley and now all of sudden he is better because he stop putting needles in his eyes?? The doctor said it would get worse...and not better.

The green dress had the Brenda Dickson feel to it ..didnt it....LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Adam has impaired vision, he shouldn't be able to operate machinery (like a car, which he's talked about), or know his way around the Newman Ranch at night, which he's done a few times.

He was never blind in that sense that he couldn't see anything at all, but his vision is isn't very good or even adequate, which still makes it difficult to believe how he's able to get around all of Genoa City by himself.

They've shown at times the way Adam perceives the outside world with his eyes, and yeah, with that kind of vision, it's hard to believe how he's able to get around at all far from the Newman Ranch...

Adam might not technically be blind, but legally, in most states, he would be classified as being legally blind, which most with tunnel vision fall into. People with this distinction definitely shouldn't be driving or walking around big estates late at night. How is he able to travel around town? I really haven't noticed. He has a driver, right? If that's the case, it should be mentioned regularly so confusion isn't caused to those who skipped episodes, or those who are picking up the show now.

He also seemed to have no problems proofreading all the documents Nick gave him at Newman, or reading text messages with his "impaired vision"...

:lol:

She would have owned the hell out of it though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, I loved it... I didn't think it was 80's... if it had shoulder pads, well then you'd have a point. Watching that Christmas 2003 episode brought alot of that home, how bad the hair and wardrobe is now. Just the difference in Sharon Case's hair alone is HUGE. They'd do better to just fire all the hair and makeup people, don't cut the actors' salaries, and let them do their OWN hair and makeup. Jeanne Cooper wears her own clothes, and she's the only one who looks good. And I know what you mean about B&B, I remember Brooke on the beach in her "It's not NICE to fool mother NATURE" gown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Huh? It's not a spoiler Toups, just my speculation. LOL!

For all I know, it could turn out not to be the case, which I'd like, since I think it's pretty predictable if it turns out to be Tucker.

I haven't read any sopilers about this story, but piecing it together, it seems obvious that Tucker might be Katherine's lost child, and it was no coincidence that he gets tangled into Katherine and Jill's lives as Jill starts to search for Katherine's "lost daughter."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think producers like Ed Scott and David Shaughnessy really cared about the aesthetics on this show, right down to how the actors/characters were dressed, their makeup, and their hair. Since the Latham era to now, these aesthetics have deteriorated in a very bad way, I think these current producers don't place much effort into making things look beautiful, or beautiful to the extent things were before. Sometimes it's too distracting how things have fallen, but if the stories were honestly good, I probably would care less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrator

I'm sorry. It's just that I know you read spoilers so when you "speculate", I'm thinking, "Is that speculation based on spoilers?" And I know in the Stephen Nichols thread, you said there was some "obvious" stuff about Russ. I'm just paranoid, especially when people who read spoilers speculate. LOL

Anyway, when Eddie Winslow showed up and Neil said, "Malcolm," I laughed. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Couldn't be further from the truth. If her being on the show was that important to me, I wouldn't still be watching. June-October sucked because of Phillip's return, the unnecessary killing of Zapato and the art story, among other things.

THANKYOU! Finally, someone said it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy