Jump to content

Lorraine Broderick as AMC head writer


Recommended Posts

  • Members

OMGOMG

I go away for three days and return to this!!! If Lorraine Broderick, who's the only current living writer with a history to AMC I could see returning tothe show IS returning this is the best 40th anniversary present I can think of for the show. WONDERFUL

As for JHC as EP--I think the writing's on the walland they're finally gonna let her go. The gossip is Ed Scott has loved AMC since the 70s and now that it's coming to LA where he lives he wants to EP... Him and Broderick could be a classic team IMHO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 722
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I was not a fan of Broderick's 1995-1997 go around on the show but I never thought the show was better than it was in the 1987-1993 era and she was a big part of that. It would probably help to add FMB, as Executive Producer, on top of this. I don't think that will happen, but it would be nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Do you guys think Lorraine was hired(even temporarily) since Frons knows DAYS is his competition in many markets and since DAYS has dialed back considerably from the outrageous camp(albeit the episodes I've seen have really bored me to tears), the ratings have made slight increases from cancellation territory to hell-freezing over renewal range? Maybe Frons wants to steal that audience or at least appeal to the ones that have left AMC, hoping to lure them back with more traditional storytelling.

And as for JHC, yeah, she sucks as a technical producer, but I don't see her as someone who would interfere with Lorraine's vision, if Frons allows her to have one. She seems very hands off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Some of us must have been picking up vibes out there, because we were discussing Broderick at length in the "Pratt fired" thread yesterday. More detailed takes of my general opinion are there.

But overall, Broderick's return is an incredibly positive move. There isn't a person out there - apart from Agnes Nixon - who better understands the heart & soul of All My Children. It's pretty well understood that Broderick was indeed considered by Nixon as her protege (and not McTavish, who is rumored to have always been quite green toward LB because of this - well, that, and LB's unprecedented three consecutive Daytime Emmys for Outstanding Writing Team at AMC).

She is not perfect, but she may be as close to perfection as we'll ever get. These are the things that are consistent: Broderick has always demonstrated that she CARES about and respects the characters. She cares about their relationships with one another. She writes them from the inside out. Whether or not you're fond of the storyline being told - i.e. Erica's swiping of Maria's baby - there is such a sharp, meticulous style of the way the story is written.... and it always comes down to the inside of the character. In the case of Erica / Maria / Baby, the catalysts, the turning points, and the culminations of the story were all emotionally riveting. As a whole, you can tell just by watching, that the material you're seeing is written by a writer who really THINKS, painstakingly, about what's being penned.

That said, All My Children is in the worst state I have ever seen it. If Broderick can't turn it around, perhaps no one can. But, if truly given the leeway to pull it off, she will bring good things to this show. I hope it isn't temporary, because this may take a little time... and, while I know viewers may not be comfortable thinking about this, time honestly isn't on All My Children's side. No matter what happens, I expect it will be off the air in a few years. It will be a love-note to viewers, especially longtime ones, to leave Broderick in place at the writing-helm of this show - and let HER see things through to its sunset. Broderick knows AMC like her own child, and she would end things on a better note than anyone else possibly could.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I guess the best thing of this, even if its short term, is that someone at ABC apparently does care about All My Children. When they announced the LA move I thought it might just be some Frons whim that they went along with, but this sort of gives me hope. This and the Pratt firing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think Broderick is middle of the road. Not fantastic, but often pretty solid despite some bad stories. I thought that anything good (and not just "fun" - there was a big difference at the time, believe me) in OLTL 2001-2002 was a result of her influence. She's a good choice to right the ship, but she is so conventional and reasonable that it shocks me that Frons allowed her at all (much like Carlivati, who is not as conventional but is, like Broderick, well-versed in his show). She's probably what AMC needs today. That show is dying; this is the last chance to resuscitate it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I hope this played better than it sounds, because I'm imagining two separate scenes (the attack by Arnie, and later Charles getting shot). In my mind, it should have been a fluid single sequence. I wonder if or how often "bastard" was uttered in this scene. Fare thee well, Christopher Reeve. I've said it before, but pop culture's gain was daytime's definite loss. Imagine seeing HIM day after day, year after year, decade after decade, conceivably until they stopped producing soaps in NYC.   Well, that answers my "bastard" question. Good lord, the roads of Rosehill are packed with high-strung drivers and/or pedestrians. More sequences that I hope played better than they sound.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think Ben had already left while under Marland and only returned briefly to reconcile with Eve. The whole thing confuses me as I thought for a long time that Eve left the show to go be with him and that was when they reconciled, but it seems like he returned, they got back together, then he left and maybe they were still together until she left to join him? I have no idea.  It does seem like the interim writers were using some characters like Justin and Helena who were quickly dumped under Kobe/Long, which is a shame. Helena is one of those characters who likely always had a shelf life but Rose Alaio was such a vibrant screen presence, if Kobe/Long had just been patient, she likely would have fit in well in the Reva era.
    • Also, the lawsuit story was not the right story to bring Naomi and Bill into a court battle since those types of lawsuits are usually resolved via settlements.
    • I know that Sara did eventually become Carrie's therapist, but I was curious if the show had her make comments regarding Carrie's stunts of making it seem as though Justin was cheating on Jackie.  Given that Justin cheated on Sara with both Jackie and Brandy, I wondered if it was wise of her to counsel Carrie given the conflict of interest involved. @DRW50I think once Adam/Sara end up married.. Marland didn't see any reason to explore Sara's personal life after the actor playing Adam was released.  I know that Sara lasts until at least Christmas 1982 on the show.. but I don't think she ended up staying on for very long into 1983. The period between Marland quitting and Pam Long starting was the perfect time to clean house on characters that had outgrown their usefulness  (i.e. Ben, Evie, Sara, Jennifer, Morgan).. and tying up stories started by Marland that were too complex (Mona Enright, Mark/Jennifer/Amanda triangle).
    • Unpopular opinion:  The focus on the soap opera tropes over the mysteries and crimes was partly what did the show in.  Also, featuring characters not involved in the legal, police, and criminal elements also hurt the show and took away what made it unique. Featuring characters like Jody, Raven, Sky, etc hurt the show long term.  The show ABCified starting in 1976/1977 and then went through a youthification period starting in 1981.  
    • I feel like the lawsuit storyline was resolved quickly because the show didn’t want to spring for more sets.
    • It's been a while, but we have seen the foyer to Bill and Hayley's house as well as the exterior entrance to their house. The foyer was first seen in the premiere episode when Hayley met Vanessa at the house.
    • There's still a year or two before Larkin arrives. Joel is there already. EON does noticeably youthify, although I think they carry it off. Admittedly I haven't seen most of the Jody stories, which from what people here have said aren't great.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy