Jump to content

B&B: October Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

With the Forresters the problem was an overload of Stephanie, Ridge and Brooke. Their stories got more and more ridiculous and went in circles. The show had problems writing for other Forrester's and for years it seemed they couldn't introduce interesting new characters, despite having some good actors in place. Now they have characters like Felicia and Thorne, who we aren't burnt out on, but they aren't utilized. The Logan's are definitely on overload and I'm not sure these families are well connected. I often find the Jackie M drama to be like a different show.

Yes. The show is entertaining, well written and well produced, but the long story doesn't work. Look at Jackie and Owen. Finally they found something that clicks for Owen, so you have another viable young lead. It's been years since Jackie has been relevant, so this is good for her as well. Then I look at all the obstacles instantly thrown at them, the cheating with Whip, the twin and now Steffy. That stuff is dragging the couple down. And with the Forrester takeover, like I mentioned before, great idea, but the execution is underwhelming.

My overall point is that the show has a lot of potential, but it's rarely realized. Right now they have the strongest cast they've had in years. They've been spreading the screentime out, not perfectly, but they're making an effort. The scripts and overall production remain consistent enough that viewers will stick around because it's familiar. I won't lie and say I even remember what happened today, but while I watch I'm entertained. I guess that counts for something. So to answer you question, yes I do think the show is both brilliant and awful!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 176
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

That's a full-force contradictio in terminis. How can something be well-written and not working at the same time? I mean, I know what you're pointing at, but you kind of put it clumsily.

Jackie & Owen is CR*P. Awwwful. Jackie needs to go ASAP and Owen put in a hot triangle with some other people. Don't know yet who.

It always had potential. Always. That's the problem with this show in the past 10-15 years, something like that. It's not a 2009 thing.

This is B&B signature: while being extreme cr*p, it managed to keep the viewers and maintain the fixability. While that kind of can't be said for, say, GH. How can you revamp that show when you need to get rid of the mob to do that but the mob is that show? Can't be done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, that was a really good scene. It's been awhile since we had a simple, well written, well acted moment like that on the show. No music, no histrionics. Jack Wagner was great. And Ashley Jones was good, too.

I'm still not digging the Forrester Creations/Spencer/Logan Sistas storyline. Since it's all about Bill and the Logans, neither one that I can possibly root for, I can care less. Even if they give the Forresters token time in the story, it never really feels like it's about them. I don't like that the Logans are pretty much the core family of the show nowadays.

I enjoy the campy Donna/Pam scenes. The Catwalk stuff was fun, even if Pam has detoured into buffoon territory. I'd take Buffoon Pam over Crazy Pam or Bill and the Logan Sistas any day.

What's up with the show now having that two commercials only break after the first segment? I keep having to rewind my DVR because in one second the show is already back on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's just like how people praise GH for it's well written scripts, yet despise the HW. Brad Bell has tons of interesting ideas he's always too afraid to follow through on. Still, however despite the lack of compelling long story, I do think the writers make it interesting on a day-to-day basis. They make the most of the 18 minutes and it flies by and always feels like B&B. I truly believe if you stopped watching 10 or 15 years ago and tuned in, it would feel like the same show. If you did that with AMC or OLTL you wouldn't recognize the show.

I agree, but I think after 2002 or 2003, the show went into a huge slump. I had never seen the show that unwatchable and it stayed that way until they brought back the Logan's. I've always hoped B&B would suddenly become the best soap on TV. I feel it's possible and that it will happen, especially with the Emmy win. Maybe I'm an idiot for hoping considering all the squandered potential.

Maybe I shouldn't say Logan overload. Maybe it's just Donna/Katie overload. The show has a strong family in the Logan's, but what are Beth (poorly cast), Stephen (could be paired with any female on this show!) and Brooke doing? Nothing. It's the same as when the Forrester's were in power. They burn us out on certain characters and waste others, even thought all we're hearing is "Forrester" or now "Logan!!" Maybe I need to think about B&B more to understand all of this. It's all so confusing and full of contradictions. When I think about it I get frustrated and my head hurts. That's why I just watch, giggle and rarely post about the show. I guess I just have a little Brooke Logan in me. I can justify anything due to my love for B&B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I dont know about you guys but I love the twist that Katie is CEO. Its a needed change for now

LMAO at Donna and Pam. Those two are gold together, no matter how ridiculous the situation. Donna's always wanted to be a talk show host? Um whatever. At least Pam was there to keep things comical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sheila, where are you?! :blink: Is your lawyer job keeping you so busy? Or does that belong to those Ibiza & Barcelona vacations? B)

RE: your post... I love the ambiguity of the soap world.

Not too long ago LoyaltoAMC posted how people laughed uncontrolably at the trainwreck cr?p that B&B is waiting for a medical exam and now... Now people call it a great soap. It's both, I guess. It's often in the middle, and then it's not, it's either trash or great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

B&B is like the modern day Falcon Crest. That was a beautiful soap with a concept that had potential pouring out of it. They did a great job with casting, it was so soapy with all those old Hollywood stars. Then you watch it and it's pure popcorn TV. Not as incomprehensible as Dynasty (which was largely garbage), but very plot driven. We had endless long lost relatives who'd be major characters for half a season, then forgotten forever. Even main characters. Endless character deaths that were quickly forgotten. Plane crashes, earthquakes, etc. Like B&B it somehow worked. I always hoped that the show would take advantage of the concept and execute a more character driven show that lived up to it's potential. It actually did for it's final season, which fans hated because they were so used to it's fluffy nature. B&B will have similar problems when it finally realizes it's potential. Thankfully it's not on the cancellation block because I don't think they could convince new viewers that the show was suddenly amazing. And I'm sure some current fans will complain if they finally find strong love interests for Brooke and Ridge that aren't each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the problem with B&B is they had a winning formula for years but they never moved past that formula. The potential was there, about eight, nine, ten years ago, but they never fully committed. I don't think Taylor works anymore. They never should have brought her back. Ridge/Brooke/Taylor doesn't work anymore. Stephanie obsessing over Ridge. Eric perving over younger women. And they seem to struggle to commit to bringing new characters in; they especially struggle with writing for the kids of the established characters.

It's always like one foot stuck in the past, more and more numb, and the other shaky, trembling in the present.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I feel like the lawsuit storyline was resolved quickly because the show didn’t want to spring for more sets.
    • It's been a while, but we have seen the foyer to Bill and Hayley's house as well as the exterior entrance to their house. The foyer was first seen in the premiere episode when Hayley met Vanessa at the house.
    • There's still a year or two before Larkin arrives. Joel is there already. EON does noticeably youthify, although I think they carry it off. Admittedly I haven't seen most of the Jody stories, which from what people here have said aren't great.
    • I don't mind the actor who plays Brian. He's fine. The problem for me is that Paige seems so wishy wishy. She doesn't seem to have much of a personality at this point so I don't see why Brian would be so besotted with her. She just lurches from one trauma to the next. Granted, it's only been a month, but she's not as vibrant as April or even Deborah who has had minimal screen time by this point.  I do worry about the influence of GH on the show since I'm in fall of 1979 and characters have conversations and there's not the drive to "youthify" the show. However, I think Marceau (sp?) is gone. He was given a rather tame sendoff. How long was the actor on the show? I hope this is not a sign of things to come. I worry the show is setting up a murder mystery around one of my favorite characters and I will be mightily annoyed. I also noticed in recent Search for Tomorrow episodes uploaded to YT that the actors playing Logan and Eliot showed up. I don't watch the show but they were in the screencaps. When does Larkin Malloy show up or has he already left? Joel Crothers hasn't shown up either unless I've blinked and missed him.
    • Dr Linden. She treated Vanessa's drug addiction (although Vanessa seemed to forget that by Henry's suicide attempt) , and she's mentioned during Reva's PPD. Although I can't recall if she's actually shown right off the top of my head. She probably was temporarily shelved when Sonni was a therapist (between her crazy times) And I think Billy sees her after he falls off the wagon after Reva's death.
    • Kinda agree. I have some issues with the sets. Nicole's living room is bland-looks like a display home. Bill and Hayley's is too small and basically hideous. And neither of them have a front door/entrance or staircase. People just appear from the corridor. Those green accents  at Uptown are way too much. Also,Naomi and Vanessa not having an office or a home .
    • Thanks @Paul Raven  That Grainger story always reads like hog-wild melodrama, not very similar to the more subtle stories for Rita in her last few years. I wonder how Lenore played the material.
    • More from 1976 Lynn, apparently making every effort to overcome her alcoholism, accepts a baby-sitting job. However, when the baby starts crying, Lynn begins to get nervous and takes one drink, then another. By the time Bruce and Van arrive home, Lynn is on the floor, ineffectually trying to find the doctor’s number, sure the baby is ill. When the mother arrives; she vows to let everyone know what goes on in the mayor’s house.Bruce insists that Lynn has to go, but Van, learning that Lynn can’t remember drinking the cooking sherry, calls Joe to report Lynn’s blackouts. Joe wants her institutionalized but gives in to Van’ s pleas that Lynn needs loving attention. Eddie has sent some of Felicia’s work to a New |York gallery owner and reports to Charles that Lisa Cooper wants to exhibit Felicia’s work. Charles refuses to tell her this and later admits he feels he has “cowed”her attention because of his being confined to a wheelchair. What Charles doesn’t say is: that he’s plagued with fears she’ll leave him for another man. Felicia is exuberant as she starts painting again. She tells Charles how she feels about it, but, jealous of anyone or anything that takes attention from him, Charles tries to undermine her confidence. Eddie finally professes his love for her. He will be happy to step forward if she will only let Be and admit that they belong together. Charles tries to stop Felicia’s ‘trip to New York by making her doubt her own work, and when that fails, he finds business reasons at his bookshop to keep Di, his ex-wife, who is running it for him, from accompanying her. Felicia finally decides it’s not going to work and tells Eddie they might as well call it off. Instead, he arranges for Lisa Cooper to come to Rosehill. Charles is rude and insulting to Lisa when she arrives at the house to view Felicia’s work, and his derogatory remarks about shady gallery dealings prompt Lisa to tell Eddie that living in such an atmosphere could permanently stunt an artist’s development; if Felicia is subjected to this indefinitely, it’s not even worth Lisa’s while to take her on as a client. Felicia finally decides she can’t be torn apart any longer and must accede to Charles’s demands. She tells Eddie her career is over and she won’t paint any more, breaks down in his arms, crying bitterly, then pulls away, unwilling to acknowledge that her feelings for him are deeper than she dare face. Charles is delighted when she prepares to dispose of her art supplies, insisting everything will be fine once she has accepted that this part of her life is over. But she cannot do it. She promises him that he can set the limits and terms, but she must paint. Arlene discovers that her mother is planning to avoid the surgery she needs, and the accompanying medical bills, by leaving Rosehill and moving in with her sister Dorothy out west. Arlene manages to prevent this by calling her aunt and telling her the truth about Carrie’s condition. Dr. Tom Crawford has been footing the costs of Carrie’s presurgery tests, but Arlene knows that Carrie won’t like this. So she tells Carrie that David Hart, the son of Meg’s late husband, the former mayor, has heard about their plight and forwarded the money as a gesture of friendship, to be repaid when possible. To convince Carrie that she does indeed have the money, Arlene asks Ray to just lend it to her for a few hours, so she can convince Carrie and then immediately return it. Ray instructs her to get dressed for a night on the town and takes her, out implying that the money will be waiting at the end of the evening. When Ian Russell happens to join them, Arlene doesn’t suspect anything is afoot, but when e Ray suddenly leaves, she becomes furious, realizing what he’s done. But she finds Mr: Russell a distinguished and cultured man, and decides there’s no harm in having a drink. After cocktails and stimulating conversation, Ian suggests that they go to his place, and Arlene agrees. But when they get there, Ian matter of factly suggests that they skip the preliminaries and get on with it. Ian is embarrassed and annoyed to discover that Arlene is not a professional call girl and that Ray didn’t explain to her the purpose of their |meeting. He is apologetic and solicitous, until Arlene, explaining why Ray felt he could pull this on her, mentions her sick mother in need of an operation. Ian starts to laugh at this overworked standard line, and a livid Arlene storms out of his apartment. Thinking it over, Ian decides he’s more intrigued with Arlene than he is annoyed at Ray, and calls Ray for her telephone number. But Arlene is not delighted to hear from him, and he has to use a good deal of soothing charm before she agrees to have dinner with him at one of the better local restaurants.During dinner Ian again apologizes for his mistake, and he gives Arlene a diamond pendant as a token of his gratitude for her forgiving him. Ray arrives to interrupt an otherwise enjoyable evening with a business matter, and quietly reminds Arlene that Ian is his customer and she’s not to cut herself in with him. At home, Arlene examines the pendant and is convinced that it’s genuine. She hides it in her dresser drawer, unable to bring herself to show it to her mother.
    • LOL!! That's funny.  I actually thought he got a little better.

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy