Jump to content

Y&R Episode Discussion for the week of July 13


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Im finally all caught up with y&r after being on vacation for the past week. Wow could they make it anymore obvious that a baby switch may be in the future. I dindt like the speculation on this board but Im pretty convinced of it now

Brad has been dead for how long and Victor still finds Colleen to be a nuisance? This plot lost all its punch considering she only appears once or twice a month and they have done little with this

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 378
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Ok... I have to know this: Who the HELL let Marcille on the soundstage with her fingernails painted like a basket of damned EASTER EGGS????!!! I'd have sent that bitch down to the CVS for some Lee press-ons and made her pay for it with her OWN MONEY.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Here's the thing. Only one of them has a baby. The other one had their baby burned in the fireplace or flushed down the toilet or whatever. This means they're going to have to come up with either a live baby or a dead baby for one of them. A live baby would be anticlimactic.What would be the point of both of them having live births? Nah. We, the audience will probably have to be subjected to watching one of these already half crazy women, both of whom have lost a child or two, lose yet another baby.

Can't wait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it's supposed to be fashionable.

Victor and Ashley were going to have the reception at the GCU frat house (Nick has connections there). TOGA, TOGA, TOGA. It's something JT would enjoy, Victoria is going to make him babysit Reed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Caught the episode yesterday evening.

ICAM with both of these posts on how I felt about the show. Although I can also understand and agree with others concerning the destruction of the Colleen character, I found some things about this episode entertaining.

The thing is that I tend to give writers very liberal creative license at times to tell their stories. So I can look over some story holes. Like Toups, the pacing is the biggest issue I have with the show right now. Could the "favorites" - MS, SC, PB, EB - have a guarantee of 5 shows a week in their contracts? Is that still realistic in today's soap world? How could it not be cheaper for them to show the "faves" M-W-F and other stories on Tu and Thur? It would make the show alot more enjoyable.

In-T-Wayzz.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I really like the new Mac. She isn't especially exciting but I don't know... I like how she's just kinda laid back and quiet. You can't do much with her but as a supporting character she's pretty cool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She's really grown on me the last few weeks. When she first came on I really didn't like her, but like you said ian, as a supporting character, she works. I think she works really well as someone that the others can go to for support or a "talk to" character. I'm still out on whether she works with Billy though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Billy Miller is putting a lot into it... so it's working OK - but they don't have a lot of push. I can see him not ending up with Chloe because they were doomed from the start, but BM and EH are excellent apart and together at any rate, in any scenes they share.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • You know what is a great way to stop these unclear "rumors"?  Just stop posting them and then back tracking with words like "apparently".   Anyhow, I didn't find the Tracy/Lois scenes as good as I hoped.    
    • Jason, in thinking this over, I realize that we look at this space, differently. To me it is a potentially collaborative space. Now that I've realized this, what I should have said, "I'm having a problem because what I'm seeing is not matching up with your descriptions. Maybe these files I just got are misdated. Maybe it's something else. I will keep you posted. Meanwhile this episode, its edit, is ready, even though I might have to issue a corrected date later. But, people can enjoy the performances now. 
    • Thank you for the constructive suggestion. 
    • But how is it "apparent" that she signed a new 3-year contract? Your wording had a voice of authority -- as if you knew it was true. A better way to post about it? Say you read online that she signed a new contract, but have no idea if that's true.
    • This interview actually reminds me a bit of Kim Zimmer’s press during the infamous clone storyline on Guiding Light, or Deidre Hall during the possession story on Days. All three were seasoned daytime veterans who made it clear they valued airtime for their characters, not just being part of a romantic pairing. It seems that idea was part of the pitch behind these bigger-than-life plots. They all took big swings in their performances. When I read Kim Zimmer’s memoir, I thought she captured it best — she wanted to be respected for being willing to take those risks. To paraphrase her, she knew it was ridiculous for Reva to think she was pregnant after menopause, but she still threw herself into those scenes and made them real. That’s what really struck me about Victoria Wyndham’s interview too. She responded like a real person. It felt like she was telling Michael Logan that she knew Justine — and a geriatric pregnancy with twins — was totally preposterous, but that she still deserved credit for trying to keep the show alive and entertain the audience. And honestly, I think that's more than fair. Logan is looking for a reductive answer for who is to blame.  And, she's telling him to accept that they were all well-meaning.  Which is not a defense of bad storytelling.  But, I understand that she's frustrated because she interpreted Logan's critique as a lack of commitment, and she wants him to know that she was committed! (maybe not for the best, but committed).
    • Fine, you only had to say so. It's not a problem to me NOT to post this. I have no idea what this means. 
    • Oh, really? I think we're really getting close.  What does "apparently" mean to you? To me, it means that this is something I think has happened but not something I absolutely positively know to have happened. When I use a word like "apparently" as I have here, I am doing so by intent. Can you think of a better way to communicate that?
    • Wow...I was not expecting a montage.   I know SilkPress did not!!! Poor Eva.  Lol. Funnily enough I missed that.     
    • For the record, VW thought having the twins at their ages was absurd & who wanted that story, was some group of fans, who wanted her & Carl to have a chance at having children together. Not any fans that I knew of, but supposedly they existed. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy