Jump to content

AMC: Beth Ehlers Vs. JR Martinez


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 143
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I don't even remember them being a real couple the first time around. Didn't he just use her for sex until they could put him with Taylor? He told her she was a prostitute. Then when Take tanked, he was pushed into Amanda's storyline.

RPG is good at playing the Jake qualities, but most of those qualities are what I don't like about Jake (sanctimonious, self-righteous, smug). I think he could be fine with better writing, but that's probably not going to happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What a bitch.

Joan Crawford wasn't "trained", either -- and look at Mildred Pierce. Sure, that was made years into her career, but not everyone nessessarily needs training.... some people just have "it".

For somone with zero experience, JR Martinez is wonderful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'll make it simple. My problem with this is the fact that she takes absolutely no responsibility for the fact that she just simply DIDN'T WOW the writers or the viewers, thereby giving them very little incentive to write for her and Taylor. No. It's the boss's fault for lack of integration and sticking her with a non actor who's stuck in second gear, forcing her to scale back her Shakesperian chops. :rolleyes:

True, the character was a fail from the start, but it didn't help that Beth Ehlers was incredibly abrasive and shrill for the first two or three MONTHS she was on this show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I saw instant chemistry with Jake and Amanda. The writers didnt have any real intentions with them and it was obvious that they were a stepping stone for Jake/Taylor. Thing is that he worked much better with Amanda and I wasnt seeing the same spark with Taylor. Those 2, like many other soap couple transplants from other shows, bombed. Im glad Pratt saw his mistake and put a quick end to that by going back with Jake and Amanda and thats been a hit for them ever since.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is how I saw it also. I must have missed their popularity with some fans.

This is what makes Jake the perfect Martin. LOL! I am ambivalent about Jake as I am about the Martins. However, I have been surprised by how quickly RPG has made him into a solid character over a short period of time.

It seems obvious that is how Beth was directed to play Taylor in order to play up the friction with Jake. The character did not work, but that is on the writing not Beth.

As is common with the online soap community, this tit for tat exchange with Beth and JR has been blown out of proportion. It will blow over. AMC will dump JR and move Taylor on to Tad, maybe a triangle with Jake, maybe not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Taylor has no place with Tad or Jake. She's annoying.

Why can't we get characters we care about back? Skye, Hayley, Brooke? I am so over these new character with no connections to the canvas.

As for Brot, I could see him with Colby.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Right, like Cliff and Nina. Or Jenny and Greg. (Sorry for the old examples, it's been a long time since I've watched AMC. I'm sure there's more recent ones, though.)

What I'm finding funny about this thread is the posters who spend their time complaining about 'hair models' and lobbying to get people they consider bad actors fired (Tammin Sursok and Amelia Heinle, anyone?) suddenly deciding that Beth Ehlers is the devil incarnate for doing the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So Beth found out the hard way that the grass isn't always greener. I think she thought she was going to take over AMC like she did GL, and instead she has flopped bigtime on AMC. I don't miss her on GL one bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's perfectly fine for me, as a poster, to complain about Clementine Ford. I would be utterly disgusted with Billy Miller if he complained about her in public. Who is one actor to sit in judgment of another actor's performance? BE should have kept her comments strictly about Pratt. It's not JRM's fault that Pratt can't write and BE is being a total bitch by calling JRM out in any way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

;) Thank you .

This sums up for me perfectly why I resisted Take as a viewer. It`s bad enough to be told by TPTB who to root for but when actors talk about how their chemistry is effortless and that they aren`t worried at all about recreating it, my hackles go up big time.

Then when Jake was so dismissive of Amanda and dropped her I felt , perhaps illogically, that it was RPG and the show who were passing over CS in favor of BE`s Taylor.

Viewers had watched Amanda for years be treated badly . She was young gorgeous and linked to the canvas through family and she had been given the " breath taking illogically desperate spinster " role that had been Simone`s. Of course we weren`t going to want to see her lose out to a grouchy, rude newbie!

I`m not a huge fan of Jake /Amanda . I like RPG`s natural delivery and they have a sweet chemistry but they are building a fan base and are popular.

Take for me committed the ultimate Daytime sin; they were dull, dull before Taylor`s paralysis and even duller after

I have a feeling that Tad/ Taylor is going to be dull too .Tad needs someone sparkly imo.

I think many viewers will now not be very open to the Tad/ Taylor idea, thanks to that interview.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know we will never get my darling Eva La Rue back because she's a primetime star but I so miss Erica having Maria as a rival! To that end, I wish we could get Robin Cristopher back as Skye or Julia Barr back as Brooke. Either of them would be fabulous with Tad. I hate that TIIC killed of Simone. She was great with Tad, too. Why must we be saddled with Taylor? I would rather lose Taylor and keep Brot honestly.

Gina Tognoni will likely return to OLTL as Kelly, but I would have loved to see on AMC also as Skye or Hayley.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Okay, so let me get this straight. She's this skilled and talented actress who, one, plays down her Shakesperian performances... so much so that her non-actor costar outshines her time and time again -- and two, allows six directors and a team of producers to tell her to play a brand new character with no connections at ALL in hopes of recreating some alleged spark as an unbearable, abrasive shrew -- and she does so? Well, if that's the case, why is she so surprised about her lack of airtime? She should've seen the big bold neon writing on the wall.

You've expressed a large part of what makes me detest Jake and Amanda. They had something going during the late summer, but once he selfishly dropped her for a woman who had very little interest in him, I was over it. Plus, being the lastest perpetrators of yet another Fake Dead Baby story, I was through.

As for RPG's delivery... I won't touch that.

But back to MacBeth Ehlers...

Anything involving Tad/Taylor/Jake is messed up. Tad was wrong for sniffing after Taylor when she was clearly with Brot AS WELL AS knowing that his brother was into her first. Every Jerry Springer fan of the late 1990's (sorry, but I was one) knows that it's Bros before Hoes. And I would view Taylor as such going from brother to brother. Add the fact that I never caught on to this whole Beth Ehlers phenomenon, and this fan will be "beating the drums" even harder than I already am.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Awww, whatever happened to poor woe its me Beth Ehlers...

LMAO.

Nia Peebles and Beth Ehlers would make great screen partners. I can't speak for Martinez because I haven't seen his work, but at least NP was right about the unskilled Eva Marcille.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Bizarrely, while I didn't see it, I distinctly remember my younger sister telling me. We were walking to the store, and at the top of the hill she let out "Roger raped Holly", and I swear I remember it echoing for what seemed like forever. She would've been five at the time.  I know,,,which I find extraordinary. I have toyed with the idea of watching Another World for Maeve, Kathleen Widdoes and Beverlee. But watching Vanessa call Emma Snyder "momma" kinda weirded me out. LOL. I believe that's what I read in the recaps from the time as well. I meant, I couldn't quite believe that the audience wouldn't understand that a woman preparing to go to her engagement party  was raped. I know that on ATWT John raped Kim while they were married, resulting in Andy, but I think they shied away from calling that marital rape.
    • I have my fingers crossed for a baby to be named Monica Michelle & called Monica. And, yes, I do realize that is not equal to having her onscreen but, like you said & of course a recast is unthinkable. 
    • I would love to have Monica on screen. Leslie Charleson has died. She played the role for 46 years. Monica should pass as well. No one is going to accept a long-term recast for Monica, no matter how great  the actress they could get.
    • Coming into June...   It just occurred to me that seeing Carter/Hope engaged that there was something missing. Oh, yeah! DAPHNE. I missed a few episodes, but she left, right? So is Ridge going to be the spoiler for Carter/Hope now? I felt that Daphne/Carter/Hope had more legs to it. But I guess we will see.   I did enjoy that show circling back around to Luna/Will/Electra. Katie was spitting nothing, but truth. Same for Sheila. And it's good to see Luna vs Electra, and they gave off more adversary chemistry this time around versus when they were at Deacon's.    I was happy to see Liam reduced to C plot.
    • To bring over from the May Sweeps Thread from @Chris B   I know the fashions have gotten mixed reviews but I actually like what the new costume designer is putting the cast in. It feels more modern and the more tacky pieces I feel make sense for rich people. They're buying for the brand and the price and we often see celebs in things like this. Especially for a character like Nikki, I feel the more over the top (and tacky), the more realistic it is.   I agree. While it has been hit and miss no question, I have found it fascinating to watch what the costume designer is attempting to do with the various characters and their clothes. Some have been overdue. Some have been fascinating. But (outside of Billy) not boring to watch. I definitely find it more modern as well.   My growing issue has been it's not good that the best reason to watch Y&R as of late has been to see what people are wearing rather than the writing. It feels like a red flag.
    • Haha. The fact that I stopped regularly viewing at the same time and know what you are talking about is chef's kiss.    I'm slowly bingewatching Nurse's Ball Week. But it's slow for me because a lot of the same tics and writing flaws for me that made me throw up my hands is still evident *cough*CVE*cough* Thankfully, there are some things I like also and from a glance in the GH May Thread, it seem like it had a good Sweeps with good fallout. And do I even need to mention Nina finally slapping the taste out of Carly's mouth? See? Regardless of her flaws, I do enjoy Korte-headed episodes over CVE-headed episodes because they always seem to have more emotional resonance to long-time fans.
    • And that charity does still get mentioned from time to time. I want to say the last time was some time this year, too. 
    • Oh, no. Vernon has definitely had his moments.   Choose silence anyone?
    • Search YT for Edwyn Sanchez, he posted an AI enhanced episode of ATWT and it is beautiful.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy