Jump to content

AMC: Beth Ehlers Vs. JR Martinez


Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

:D

I was sort of joking about more Martins but you're right -- the Martins are all BABY-NAPPERS!!! It's a disease with them. Hide your babies!

  • Replies 143
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

I don't even remember them being a real couple the first time around. Didn't he just use her for sex until they could put him with Taylor? He told her she was a prostitute. Then when Take tanked, he was pushed into Amanda's storyline.

RPG is good at playing the Jake qualities, but most of those qualities are what I don't like about Jake (sanctimonious, self-righteous, smug). I think he could be fine with better writing, but that's probably not going to happen.

  • Members
Posted

What a bitch.

Joan Crawford wasn't "trained", either -- and look at Mildred Pierce. Sure, that was made years into her career, but not everyone nessessarily needs training.... some people just have "it".

For somone with zero experience, JR Martinez is wonderful.

  • Members
Posted

I'll make it simple. My problem with this is the fact that she takes absolutely no responsibility for the fact that she just simply DIDN'T WOW the writers or the viewers, thereby giving them very little incentive to write for her and Taylor. No. It's the boss's fault for lack of integration and sticking her with a non actor who's stuck in second gear, forcing her to scale back her Shakesperian chops. :rolleyes:

True, the character was a fail from the start, but it didn't help that Beth Ehlers was incredibly abrasive and shrill for the first two or three MONTHS she was on this show.

  • Members
Posted

I saw instant chemistry with Jake and Amanda. The writers didnt have any real intentions with them and it was obvious that they were a stepping stone for Jake/Taylor. Thing is that he worked much better with Amanda and I wasnt seeing the same spark with Taylor. Those 2, like many other soap couple transplants from other shows, bombed. Im glad Pratt saw his mistake and put a quick end to that by going back with Jake and Amanda and thats been a hit for them ever since.

  • Members
Posted

This is how I saw it also. I must have missed their popularity with some fans.

This is what makes Jake the perfect Martin. LOL! I am ambivalent about Jake as I am about the Martins. However, I have been surprised by how quickly RPG has made him into a solid character over a short period of time.

It seems obvious that is how Beth was directed to play Taylor in order to play up the friction with Jake. The character did not work, but that is on the writing not Beth.

As is common with the online soap community, this tit for tat exchange with Beth and JR has been blown out of proportion. It will blow over. AMC will dump JR and move Taylor on to Tad, maybe a triangle with Jake, maybe not.

  • Members
Posted

Taylor has no place with Tad or Jake. She's annoying.

Why can't we get characters we care about back? Skye, Hayley, Brooke? I am so over these new character with no connections to the canvas.

As for Brot, I could see him with Colby.

  • Members
Posted

Right, like Cliff and Nina. Or Jenny and Greg. (Sorry for the old examples, it's been a long time since I've watched AMC. I'm sure there's more recent ones, though.)

What I'm finding funny about this thread is the posters who spend their time complaining about 'hair models' and lobbying to get people they consider bad actors fired (Tammin Sursok and Amelia Heinle, anyone?) suddenly deciding that Beth Ehlers is the devil incarnate for doing the same.

  • Members
Posted

So Beth found out the hard way that the grass isn't always greener. I think she thought she was going to take over AMC like she did GL, and instead she has flopped bigtime on AMC. I don't miss her on GL one bit.

  • Members
Posted

It's perfectly fine for me, as a poster, to complain about Clementine Ford. I would be utterly disgusted with Billy Miller if he complained about her in public. Who is one actor to sit in judgment of another actor's performance? BE should have kept her comments strictly about Pratt. It's not JRM's fault that Pratt can't write and BE is being a total bitch by calling JRM out in any way.

  • Members
Posted

;) Thank you .

This sums up for me perfectly why I resisted Take as a viewer. It`s bad enough to be told by TPTB who to root for but when actors talk about how their chemistry is effortless and that they aren`t worried at all about recreating it, my hackles go up big time.

Then when Jake was so dismissive of Amanda and dropped her I felt , perhaps illogically, that it was RPG and the show who were passing over CS in favor of BE`s Taylor.

Viewers had watched Amanda for years be treated badly . She was young gorgeous and linked to the canvas through family and she had been given the " breath taking illogically desperate spinster " role that had been Simone`s. Of course we weren`t going to want to see her lose out to a grouchy, rude newbie!

I`m not a huge fan of Jake /Amanda . I like RPG`s natural delivery and they have a sweet chemistry but they are building a fan base and are popular.

Take for me committed the ultimate Daytime sin; they were dull, dull before Taylor`s paralysis and even duller after

I have a feeling that Tad/ Taylor is going to be dull too .Tad needs someone sparkly imo.

I think many viewers will now not be very open to the Tad/ Taylor idea, thanks to that interview.

  • Members
Posted

I know we will never get my darling Eva La Rue back because she's a primetime star but I so miss Erica having Maria as a rival! To that end, I wish we could get Robin Cristopher back as Skye or Julia Barr back as Brooke. Either of them would be fabulous with Tad. I hate that TIIC killed of Simone. She was great with Tad, too. Why must we be saddled with Taylor? I would rather lose Taylor and keep Brot honestly.

Gina Tognoni will likely return to OLTL as Kelly, but I would have loved to see on AMC also as Skye or Hayley.

  • Members
Posted

Okay, so let me get this straight. She's this skilled and talented actress who, one, plays down her Shakesperian performances... so much so that her non-actor costar outshines her time and time again -- and two, allows six directors and a team of producers to tell her to play a brand new character with no connections at ALL in hopes of recreating some alleged spark as an unbearable, abrasive shrew -- and she does so? Well, if that's the case, why is she so surprised about her lack of airtime? She should've seen the big bold neon writing on the wall.

You've expressed a large part of what makes me detest Jake and Amanda. They had something going during the late summer, but once he selfishly dropped her for a woman who had very little interest in him, I was over it. Plus, being the lastest perpetrators of yet another Fake Dead Baby story, I was through.

As for RPG's delivery... I won't touch that.

But back to MacBeth Ehlers...

Anything involving Tad/Taylor/Jake is messed up. Tad was wrong for sniffing after Taylor when she was clearly with Brot AS WELL AS knowing that his brother was into her first. Every Jerry Springer fan of the late 1990's (sorry, but I was one) knows that it's Bros before Hoes. And I would view Taylor as such going from brother to brother. Add the fact that I never caught on to this whole Beth Ehlers phenomenon, and this fan will be "beating the drums" even harder than I already am.

  • Members
Posted

Awww, whatever happened to poor woe its me Beth Ehlers...

LMAO.

Nia Peebles and Beth Ehlers would make great screen partners. I can't speak for Martinez because I haven't seen his work, but at least NP was right about the unskilled Eva Marcille.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • I honestly don't care if Laura is friends with Sonny.  She's been friends with him for decades.  The way she goes about the friendship is stupid.   She has no sense of self-preservation or awareness about the optics of parading her friendship with Sonny around town.  She practically celebrates it.  There's no reason in the world she can't just keep the friendship low key and explain they share a grandchild and frame the relationship that way.  A lot of Laura's choices, like getting into a public fight with Dalton, just make her look silly and like a fairly incompetent mayor. Carly is another PC lady that's starting to look silly.  I know she's explained her plan a lot, but it's still stupid and moving at a glacial pace.  If Joss is 45 by the time her revenge plot unfolds, what's the point?  Just dump Brennen and move on please.
    • On that same note, it's astounding to have mobster Sonny in the same office with Mayor Laura chatting it up about their mutual grandson. Think about the reaction if John Gotti and Mayor Eric Adams had a friendship

      Please register in order to view this content

      ?? I guess the Logic behind Sonny & Jason acceptance is like when i saw a documentary where FBI agents said they'd rather deal with the mafia than terrorists or cartels---they're the "lesser of 3 evils". Anyway I'm about 30 years late on this convo.
    • Im confused. Does Jessica know anything about June's relation to Tyrell? At the start of the episode, it seemed like June was gonna slip that he was her son but she caught herself but later in the episode she referred to him as "my boy" and Jessica had no reaction like that wasnt a surprise to her No, Anita was putting money in the account every 6 months but we werent told how much was in it when Leslie became a beneficiary. The show has set it up that it was multiplying based off the interest so that its really worth quite alot now. I dont buy it but thats what they've told us
    • What was the point in Lori's return as Mrs. Max Hollister? That little story never made much sense to me.  Were there plans for a permanent return? Or even a new family with her as the matriarch?  
    • I guess it depends on your device.  I can watch CW shows via their website on my Windows PC.
    • Ooooo A Liam episode? I'll watch it later today. They sure are churning the daily episodes out early.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Welcome back, Shawn Douglas! It's been a while. It really is too bad that the writers don't really have an interest in the character because there are still a lot of ways that he can be used effectively on the canvas. He should have been a part of the 60th anniversary celebrations as well. If anything, just to represent Bo and Hope. And I'd much rather see Jada paired with him than possibly with Theo. But I enjoyed him getting caught up with Belle, and comforting her. I'm sure they'll find their way back to each other at some point but I do like them as divorced friends. I just hope we see it play out onscreen. Belle being a dick about Sami again was unnecessary though. And we finally saw Liam again!  I'm curious to see how this storyline is going to play out, and who's going to be weaved into it. He and Abe do work well together too. And we learned that he has a kid. Hopefully, we'll learn more about his character in the future. But I'm not really sure about Johnny and Chanel suddenly having problems with raising Trey. They've wanted a baby for so long, so I don't understand why this is even an issue. They should know by now what it's like to raise a baby. But I did enjoy Johnny's scenes with EJ, and that Johnny still hasn't refused to forgive him. This storyline was/is very clunky, but having the two of them be at odds is the right decision. There's so much story potential that can be drawn from that. As for Chad... there was no time for us to see his reunion with Will, but there's time for us to see him talking BS with Leo? I don't get it. And I don't get all this random dating app stuff either. Leo and Javi were boring af too. If we're forced to endure them, can they at least have some real conflict? The two of them losing the baby was the perfect opportunity for it. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy