Jump to content

Y&R: Week of June 8, 2009


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 785
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Honestly watching the clip I'm baffled I understand the need for drama I know Nick and Sharon got stupider as characters this year (if possible) but did they lose all class and tact even where their child is concerned? Which teenager or even adult wants to hear their parents announce that their expected kiid brother or siister maybe daddy's or step-daddy's it seriously make sense to wait for some dna results before announcing these things :huh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Their eventual wedding at the close of the show, say in 2016, will be what you want...closure.

This is NOT closure. Neither Nick nor Sharon have dealt with any of their issues. This is an interim stop in a much longer journey, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But what is the agenda? I don't quite get what they are trying to accomplish. Why break of Nick and Phyllis, if you aren't going to do a good full on reunion for Nick and Sharon. It didn't have to last, but at least let the set up be romantic. Give them a few months of happiness. I don't understand what the show is trying to accomplish. Unless they do think this is the happy romantic reunion some viewers have been waiting for. :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think they want to keep ambiguity going because they think this is a way to keep fans invested. They may feel that some fans will always want Nick with Phyllis, so they have to put some doubt into the story with Nick and Sharon. I guess the problem is how to write the ambiguity without making the characters look shallow. Bill Bell managed to pull this off for years with Victor and Nikki, probably because when they weren't together, they were genuinely committed to their other partners. They didn't need to have sex because they were essentially having sex every time they would argue, or Nikki would crash one of Victor's weddings.

I also think they made a mistake bringing Cassie into this story. Earlier they set up a story where Sharon's problems were rooted in her early past. Bringing Cassie in devalues the impact she had because she becomes a crutch, people are more likely to remember her as her parents using her death as an excuse for being sluts, and this also potentially devalues her if they ever want to bring her into the story at a later date.

Someone at Y&R may also see the characters as pawns (which they are to a writer, but not to fans) and they don't understand the impact if the character starts sleeping around with various people and yet is still supposed to be in some type of true love forever relationship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The next step to crap-dom in this story is having Nick go back to Phyllis once he realizes he can't handle all that comes with "committing" (even by Nick and Sharon's standards) to Sharon, GOD i swear if they give them another round I'll have only a few characters left to keep me hanging in :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I guess I'm just ready for short term closure now. Like I said it didn't have to last this go around, but what they have given us is truly repulsive, imo. I'm not even a huge Sharon and Nick fan, that's the funny part. I just wanted a good reunion and then the cracks in their marriage can start to show again. But all the multiple people the quad has shagged of late makes me HATE the story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There are several

1. Make Nick Happen

2. Make the Newman men happen

3. Prop a certain Giggling Heffa

4. Appease certain entitled vocal fanbases

5. Prop Noah

TPTB screwed EVERY fanbase.

Nick/Sharon, Jack/Sharon, Nick & Phyllis, Jack/Phyllis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's not that I don't agree with you, in this case, it's that it'd be nice if there were one thing you did enjoy about the show that you could share.

Why do you watch if this is not the case?

There are too many loose ends for this to be the ultimate reunion between Nick and Sharon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There are so many great posts in this thread that I wish I could reply to every single one of them, but I don't have the time.

Thank you all for the great welcome! It may take me days to read through the entire week's posting of Y&R, but I'm never bored with it. I just love the different personalities and input.

I still watch GL, and OLTL, but I haven't posted in those threads because it takes me a long time to get through the Y & R one!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

How many times am I going to praise Nina's apperances here and there and Elizabeth Hendrickson/Chole? Those two are about the only thing I actually like going on at the moment.

Out of habit, and no matter how bad this show is, I watch because it's my routine. I may take a break here and there, but I stll keep up with what's going on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I feel the need to answer this since people keep asking. Why watch a soap when it sucks? Habit and loyalty. Many soap viewers are watching the life story of characters they love and grew up on. Sometimes that story sucks (ATWT I'm looking at you), but that doesn't mean I'm going to bail on watching the lives of people I've cared about for 20 years. Yeah, that makes me an old school kind of viewer, but that's the kind of viewer soaps need. As a soap loses that kind of viewer they die. We saw it with GL. As some point there was nothing recognizable left and many of the people who GL had to work to lose left. Let's hope that doesn't happen to Y&R anytime soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
    • That would have made sense. Did all these characters get dropped when DePriest left or had they already been dropped?
    • The other issue with Missy: in June 2020, she "liked" some social media posts by Candace Owens -- things Candace said that were against Black Lives Matter.  That is described here https://tvline.com/news/melissa-reeves-racism-days-of-our-lives-instagram-controversy-2894568/ I don't know if that was ever resolved.
    • She appeared onscreen not long after Rose Livingston and Sara Montaigne, and we found out that Sara was Rose's estranged daughter. I wonder whether Peggy might have been part of that family group -- or else they were just juggling a few different potential mysteries so that they could develop whatever seemed to be getting the best response from the audience. They didn't do anything much with Rose and Sara really either. Maybe Rose would have become more prominent if Rachel and Mac had split up over Mitch, or if Sara had really flourished. In some ways I can picture Cheryl being affected by MJ's prostitution similarly to how Josie was distressed by finding out about Sharlene. But I can also see that Josie as a Frame being involved with Matthew would have different stakes for Rachel and Sharlene than Cheryl being involved with Scott. I do think the solution for Cheryl would have had to be a badder boy than Scott -- either a real bad boy who would do her wrong, or the kind of bad boy (not Chad!!!) who is essentially misunderstood and other people just don't understand. Cheryl would also have been better off with some friends her own age. Matthew and Josie benefited a bit from having other teenagers to interact with.
    • Sally Spencer was a decent actress, but the writing destroyed the "M.J." that Kathleen Layman had built. Layman had a quiet strength about her, and she and Osburn really felt like sisters. Spencer's character should have been either an unmentioned sister, or maybe Jake's that grew up close to Kathleen, M.J. and the rest, but was away for a few years before joining the force. Kristen Marie was o.k., but I always got a mousier vibe from her. Being pigeon-holed with Scott for most of the run hurt things for her, as well.  The Loves were also underserved between Rhonda Lewin and Philece Sampler. Philece would have been better as Nicole. Thank goodness Anne Heche  showed up for the next round of auditions. Christopher Holder was mediocre as Peter, but given a shot, I think Marcus Smythe could have stuck around for a while.  I would have had Peggy Lazarus be a Frame -- possibly an ex-wife for Vince with an agenda. Smythe and Hollen had  a fun chemistry that could have kept the two around.. Bringing recasts for  Cheryl and Ben back mixing it up with other Frames. Corys, Lawrences at the time might have kept all the families stronger. 
    • shoot...he said in that Locher room with Krista. I think he met her before that---she was doing Broadway and they had mutual friends or an agent maybe?
    • Yes. And I assume he met Mary Ellen Stuart at GL.
    • That's an odd coincidence. Yeah, Roger would turn anything he could to his advantage. At the time, he's just taking the pictures to bank leverage over Reva, Billy or the Lewises.  I'm kinda squeamish about 1986 episodes myself. I'd love to hear the original version of Ross/Vanessa/Dinah, but the Cain story is bad, and I don't want Billy and Vanessa to break up.
    • Eeek. I didn't know this either! I will say, though, even though they skimmed over a lot of Roger's past, I will give them props for not trying to turn him into a hero. Yeah, I was hoping we would get more 1986 episodes than were available on YT before, but now I'm wondering if I really want to see that. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy