Jump to content

Another World Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Probably. Not to be ageist but I wonder if any newer writers on soaps even know how to do that type of stuff.

@Xanthe Yes there are a number of moments reading synopses, like one where I could swear Mac implies to Iris that he was only with her mother because she was pregnant with Iris, that make the retcon dubious to me. Clearly Lemay regretted it. I get the short-term idea, sending Iris on a tizzy, making her question her whole existence, but probably not worth it, especially as the show seemed to give up on Sylvie quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 13.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

The original story was that Iris would discover that Sylvie was Jewish and they would deal with anti-semitism as Iris would not be  happy.

No doubt Iris would accept it all in the end as a message to the audience but again P&G and,or NBC got cold feet and dropped it. 

Lemay was obviously using his power eg high ratings to push more 'controversial' stories but kept getting shut down. Maybe another factor in his burn out.

They even weren't happy with older woman/younger man romances ie Sylvie/Dennis so gay or Jewish plots had no hope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks. That makes more sense as I can imagine Iris being upset and taking a long time to get over her prejudices. 

Elena/Dennis doesn't ever seem that interesting to me in the few clips of it, but I wish we could see more. It doesn't help that it's so earnest and Dennis doesn't have a lot of personality. Something that remains the case in his later appearances under Chris Bruno.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Does anyone here happen to recall what year it was that KING-5 Seattle took AW off the air without warning? I've found an article showing that by 1994 it was back on the air but not when they brought it down.

Edit to Add: Found it! Oct. 1993!

I believe it was 1987 when San Francisco pulled that, wasn't it?

Edited by Contessa Donatella
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

We discussed this earlier when I asked if Sylvie was intentionally coded as Jewish. 

But, I just realized that there is an interesting issue based on the intent of anti-Semitism.  Because, it seems a bit unfair to pin the rejection of Sylvie on Iris, rather than Mac.  If we are to believe the retcon, Mac slept with Sylvie and then he and Mrs. Cory adopted Iris, who was the product of the affair.  But, given his own confession that he didn't love his wife, couldn't we also infer that Mac rejected Sylvie based on her religion and ethnicity?  Iris gets all the blame, when her father is the one that determined he could not have a future with a woman who came from a different background. 

It's a big push, but I wonder if that is part of the reason that they decided to leave Sylvie as coded, rather than identifying her as a Jewish woman.  Does that make sense with the story?  Because I could understand why they wouldn't want to deal with the implications of Mac being a racist. 

Although, I'll never know why a story like that makes it through the pitch phase, and then the production gets cold feet after it has begun to air.  They had to anticipate some controversy when it was first presented.  That is always frustrating for the creatives and the audience. 

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's the problem with retcons on top of retcons. There was no implication that Mac had rejected Sophie if Iris' father was supposed to have been someone else, which was the first retcon when Amanda was born. It was only later when they introduced the additional layer that Mac was in fact Iris' biological father that it calls into question why he walked away from Sylvie. (Although I guess to be fair she was apparently in prison for murder (Kirk Laverty blackmail retcon) and he didn't know about the baby.)

Mac's timeline is very hard to trace and I am not sure how old Iris was when her adoptive mother died. Who was raising Iris while Mac was running around fathering Sandy and Paulina?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, Sandy was around Jamie's age, and Jamie and Dennis were the same age. Therefore Sandy and Dennis were around the same age.  Meaning that Iris had already grown up and married before Sandy was even conceived.  It also means Sandy was young enough to be Mac's grandson.

And you are so correct about "retcons on top of retcons."  The 1978 revelation that Iris had been adopted was itself a retcon, and the plot just came out of nowhere without any foreshadowing whatsoever.  Then in 1988, all that was completely undone by a second retcon saying now that Iris really was Mac's bio daughter.  The 1978 retcon was acceptable, I suppose.  But the second one in 1988 was just silly and unnecessary.  It served absolutely no purpose to undo Iris's adoption storyline.  I'd love to know which head-writer was behind this decision in 1988. If I'm not mistaken, Iris told Mac that she was indeed his bio daughter in Donna Swajeski's very first credited episode.  So, if Swajeski made that decision, she certainly did it very quickly and obviously without much thought.  On the other hand, since it was so early in Swajeski's reign, it is possible (even likely) that this craziness was part of Harding Lemay's storyline projections.  Franky, I find it difficult to imagine this was Lemay's idea.  It just doesn't seem at all like something he would do.  Of course it is possible that either Lemay or Swajeski were forced to make the change by someone at a higher level at NBC or at P&G. But dear God, why???

By the way, can anyone confirm my dates?  Is there any way to verify this occurred in Swajeski's first episode as head-writer?  I am just composing this from memory, but I believe I am correct.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I had always assumed Lemay was the one who retconned Iris not being Mac's biological daughter, because he brought her back and she revealed this truth in her second episode back. Lemay wrote about his regrets over high melodrama in his last few years of his original AW stint. I figured he might have seen this twist as more pointless melodrama that just distracted from the power of the original Iris-Mac obsession storyline.

This happened on October 27, 1988. Lemay is credited as headwriter from September 12-November 10, 1988.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

OMG!  Well I was way off, wasn't I?  I apologize for spreading something so inaccurate.  I have believed for years, that Lemay's final script was the day Rachel answered the door at the end of the episode, and Iris stood in front of her.  And that the following episode was Swajeski's first credited script.   Where the Hell did I get that idea?   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, of course. A scene with Carmen Duncan and Cali Timmins had floated into my head and I had forgotten about Dennis.

By the way, when I was skimming the AWHP synopses for 1979 (trying to confirm when the info about Sylvie's stint in prison came out) I noticed that apparently she bought Olive's house (at least it mentions Dennis preferring Olive's house over John's for her and the next thing we know she's having a housewarming party). I know we were discussing Olive's house here recently so I found that interesting. And then of course Sylvie was gone by the end of the year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, my memory is not clear on which house Sylvie bought, but I remember she bought one of them. Either John and Pat's old house, or Olive's new house.  

And regarding Sylvie's time in prison (and Iris being born in prison) -- If I'm not mistaken, all that was in scripts written after Harding Lemay had left as head writer.  Tom King was the writer who penned that stuff.  Do you know if I am correct about that?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I had just read the section in Eight Years in Another World where Lemay is sad to tune in and see what kind of storylines his successors are inflicting upon the show, including making Sylvie a suspect in a murder mystery. Checking the HW credits on the AWHP I see Lemay left in May and the blackmail started in September when King was indeed HW.

Lemay also did not approve of Mac taking up with Janice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wonder what plans Lemay had for Janice.

On paper, Janice being thrown into the Mac and Rachel turmoil probably shouldn't have worked, but Christine Jones was so electric to watch and sold the desperation exceedingly well. I wonder if they ever regretted killing her off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • On the subject of sets (seems more interesting to discuss than the actual show)  Some sets we don't see anymore Lauren/Michael apartment (haven't seen that in years) Victoria's house (are Marian/Tessa living there?) Apartment above Crimson Lights (I think Chelsea was the last resident) Penthouse (Lily's home) Chancellor Estate (Devon/Abby) Chancellor office (once Dark Horse) Nick's house GCAC room (used as residence/hotel room for several characters) Some of these may pop up again. The tack house,for example, was not seen for many months before being used again. Have I missed anything?
    • Thanks for searching through everything. Worked on them so long, just too lazy to check for those links myself, so I am glad you chose to do it! I guess I never did type out anything for 1973-1977 in regards to the preemptions, but they are on the charts at least (and this far back, they don't seem to do any of those "breakouts" anymore, so things are simpler in the 1970's, so eventually I could type those out). 
    • I dump on the Y&R sets problem all the time, but BOLD is no better -- and they're not even introducing new sets. All of their sets are years old, and very few look like they're inhabited by people with money. Is that going to change with this move? I'd rather they save the money spent on another remote, which is no better than an HGTV travelogue, and get some new/better sets.
    • The donut posts here make up for a Friday show that was barely meh. Aside from seeing Anna, I really didn't care much about anything else. While I understand the thought behind breaking up all the sadness with "other scenes," I'd rather they moved right to John's funeral. Instead of hearing a stupid story about John changing some minor character's tire 20 years ago, just move on to the crying. I also thought the Chad and Cat scenes were a waste. I realize not everyone is devastated by John's death to the point of not functioning, but going sky diving is a choice. By the way, Jack and Jennifer are giving me nothing on this return. Please leave asap. DAYS did such a great job with John's death, so ending the week this way was a letdown.
    • Add Dr. Montgomery to list of fine women on this show! I hope the show goes forward with Madison/Chelsea and then once they're developed, bring back Allison, who is now divorced or a widow, for a Madison/Chelsea/Allison triangle.  It would definitely be the hottest triangle in daytime.  
    • I wonder if Linda Bloodworth-Thomason had Kim in mind for any of her other characters/series. If they intended Allison Sugarbaker (Julia Duffy's character) to be more in line with who Suzanne was/Delta Burke's portrayal-persona, then I think Kim would have aced that. Yes, it would have been odd, Kim having previously played a different character (from a different family), but Designing Women wouldn't have been the first show with that issue. Or maybe Kim could have played Beth Broderick's role on Hearts Afire. Or Patricia Heaton's role on Women of the House.
    • Sony is probably waiting until Y&R’s lease is up as well. All of TV City is going to be gutted, so they have to relocate at some point. 
    • At this point Y&R's next step is to go fully green screen and have the actors Zoom from home.
    • I was just taking about this in the Y&R thread - they desperately need better studio space. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy