Jump to content

Y&R: Week of April 20, 2009


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Nia Peeples final scenes showed what an asset she could have been to the show.She was a 'good' character who could be strong/vulnerable-she came across as very real.she managed to rise above the muddled character writing.

So what's next for the Winters?Where's the interest with Neil and Tyra coming together?Maybe Gil will be brought into play again?

I'm already over the mournful Billy/Mac lokks.It's supposed to be 6 years later.I would prefer to see them move back to this slowly.Billy has plenty on his plate trying to deal with Chloe and fatherhood.

Since both Billy and Mac are new to the roles,we need to see this new pairing connecting,rather than just play on the fact that they were once involved.

With Kevin currently incarcerated and Sharon, Amber and Phyllis guilty of criminal activity,that means in the past few months we've seen Lowell,Victor,Adam,Gloria and Katherine behind bars.This says something about the stories the show is telling.

Can we move away from criminal activities as the basis of plots?

The backburnering of Nikki,Paul,JT,Victoria,Heather,Colleen and the Winters is not good storytelling.All of these characters could have been more involved in the story.

Can we have a mention of how Casey is doing?

I am not buying the Katherine/Jill story-the insta hate from Jill is too much.

The upcoming weddings have me worried.The show is still operating from the notion that everyone has to be married off.That notion has lead to characters like Ashley and Jack being married 5/6 times.

It is harder to write for happily married couples.They either go backburner or are separating less than a year later over some issuethat pales against what they went through to get married in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 319
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Hated the show today from the background electronic 80's piano music (the worse aspect of all), to the pacing ,to the dialogue I did not care what happened in any capacity in this episode. I also think this Kevin storyline is stupid I no longer care what any of it means

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

i wasn't too impressed with today's show. It's the first time in a long time i was disappointed. Kevin going bonkers is getting REALLY old. There's something so cruel yet unbelievable how Kevin only wants Amber now. I guess it makes plausible sense with his whole brainwashed thing, but there's no ring of truth to it. Seeing Jana suffer like this isn't fun and I really think EO is on her way out, which would be a shame. LML's remaining loose threads do include Jana and her pithily explained history.

And my God, do i hate Devon. The most preachy, judgemental character on soaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I didn't think today was that bad. The kevin stuff IS getting old, though. Believe it or not, I didn't notice the electric piano music, and I'm shocked... cause I usually notice things like that. I think some of this might be just a let down from yesterday being so stellar. And some people thought the montage at the end of yesterday's show was too cheesy, but I LIKED IT. I would have used the old, original instrumental version of Bless The Beasts amd the children the show used in the 70's, instead of having "You know who" sing it... but it could have been worse. BTW, the original instrumental version that was used in the movie AND used on Y&R is in this clip, starting at 3:00, just a little memory refresher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This song gets to me every time. I just love it. Love it.

My favorite version:

See 3:15 in this clip

Oh God, I loved Chuckie. I wish Snapper could have told him that he was his father. I wonder if this nephew of Jill's will someday appear in Genoa City--along with Snapper's daughter Jennifer (and any other kids we don't know about?).

Sally Roland (Chuckie's mother) was on the very first episode of Y&R (talking about having sex with Snapper, who was pining for Chris Brooks). So it was kind of nice to see her come full circle in this little arc.

For all those in the anti-Bell thread who say Bill Bell didn't know how to tell a story...yeah, right. (Watch those credits at the end--writing/production/acting. What a roster!)

">
" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344">

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah. This one was weaker. They even had A-players on, like Morrow and Stafford and Case and Bregman and Leblanc...but it was a weaker show. I'd be fine with this being another "adaggio"...softer...pause...but the episode just seemed stalled.

Monday's show was so strong (shockingly, given that it had some of the show's weakest characters front and center) that I think most anything would have paled by contrast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Even I'll chime in to say the chipmunk is....odd. Not even "funny", just odd.

It would make sense if somehow it is revealed that Terrible Tom molested Kevin with a chipmunk or something...ANYTHING to make that a relevant psychotic object.

But for now, it it just ... odd. And the problem is, it takes me ought of what could otherwise be engaging (i.e., "what are the corridors of the catatonic mind like?").

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • When the announcement was first made, I did wonder if other plans were in the works. I guess we can always keep hoping, especially as the show has a small core cast.
    • @chrismlAbout Lisa, agree to disagree. Actually at the time she was the only thing my partner & I disagreed about. Naturally she was Team Vicky while I was steadfast as Team Lisa.  About John & twin paternity, I think that like the 3 pillows was a transitory idea someone had that no one else agreed with. More of the attempt to accommodate Philece. About MJ, co-sign, 100% agree, if there were more degrees I would claim them. About Wally & Felicia, always a fan. Mitch? Eh, take or leave. Although I do agree that WGE is a really striking man. Who have I left out? I don't know so that's all I got.
    • RIP Wayne Lewis.

      Please register in order to view this content

      (he sings near the end of the episode) https://deadline.com/2025/06/wayne-lewis-dead-atlantic-starr-founder-singer-1236426870/
    • Dallas peaked early, IMO. Maybe not a fair statement as I’m still making my way through the first half of its run, but I think it’s hard to argue to point that S3 into S4 was its high point. Back to Knots. Wrapping up “And Never Brought to Mind.” Greg’s introduction kinda took me by surprise. I low-key dreaded his arrival bc I know he very quickly gets to the center of the show, but even though they wasted no time connecting him with Mac, Abby, Gary, and Karen, it still feels like a gradual intro. The juxtaposition of the ending of the Chip story with the heating up Abby’s plotting is quite symbolic of the changes the show was going through. I absolutely cannot imagine Kenny and Ginger having any part in any of this. Yall, the Gary/Val piano theme that they pull out from time to time is my FAVORITE. I find myself humming it constantly.
    • Bloodshed is inevitable now. It’s another reason I’m glad Black people aren’t getting involved in these protests. As awful as this is, I keep reminding myself that 54 percent of Latino men voted for Trump. These people were put in harm’s way by members of their own communities and sometimes even members of their own families. Too many people decided to touch the stove.
    • Maybe I'm still in denial, but nothing about Neighbours' ongoing social media output gives the vibe of a show that's ending. In today's 'Roundup' video, Alan Fletcher referenced that production finishes in five weeks, but in all the show's posts the cast are as jovial and lighthearted as ever. Remarkably so for people who are about to lose their jobs.    Perhaps they're just putting a brave face on things, and I know they approached the previous axing with a positive attitude. Maybe putting an upbeat face on things is a collective way of showing potential backers that there's still life in the show? Or is it possible that they already know the show has been saved, and we'll get an announcement next month when filming wraps and the show 'rests'?   Does any of that make sense?!
    • A very good week for male eye candy on GH. New Michael is beautiful, Curtis's arms looked great in that polo shirt, Cody looks even more handsome with his new haircut AND we got Marco in swim shorts rocking his lovely bod and chest fur. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Yeah when Jamey Giddens did breakdowns for DAYS, he would sometimes state in tweets that specific things were his idea that he had pitched to Ron.
    • I don't, since they've clearly incorporated them into Tomas' storyline, and I happen to like his tattoos, but his jackets not fitting doesn't mean they're trying to cover his tattoos. The clothing overall isn't the issue; it's the fit. And I expect(ed) more from Jeresa Featherstone and her team. Very disappointed. He's the only male, overall, whose costume irritates me.
    • "And OMG, watching the scenes of Roger's return in comparison...the quality in the writing really nosedived. The stupid mask." Very much agreed.  Having Roger hide behind a mask for weeks/months, with it culminating with him swinging in on a vine at Blake/Phillip's wedding....geez.  So juvenile. IMO, Guiding Light never did a good job reintroducing major characters, either from the dead or elsewhere.  Masked balls = awful.  Amish = awful. When Reva was brought back from the dead, she should've just showed up in Springfield as Reva, and informed everyone that she had been gone for years because she felt like it.  She had a four-year fling with some dude who ended up dumping her due to disloyalty. Josh would be pissed and declare that their love is not *always* but *sometimes* and he'd act accordingly.  Her kids would hate her.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy