Jump to content

GL Actor Returning


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I'm surprised nobody's jumped on the latest GL casting news, via Soapoperadigest.com, that Paul Anthony Stewart is returning as Danny Santos. Yet, there's still a new Michelle to be cast instead of bringing back Nancy St. Alban (oh darn, no big loss!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No kidding! What's next? Jonathan? UnDeadTammy? Colonel Dax?! WTF?!

Well there goes the whole "let it die with a little dignity" pipedream. The mob garbage and the incessant Manny roller-coaster was one of the things that dragged GL so far down the drain for years!

So is Danny coming home to reestablish the Santos family's hold on all the organized criminal activity in that hotbed of sin, Peapack? Can you just see the Santoses taking control of the lucrative market in importing feed for the pond ducks? Or maybe the cotton balls for the nail salon? Or they could shakedown the owner of the convenience stores that sells only P&G products for protection money? :rolleyes:

Granted St. Alban was horrible and I rather liked Bonner as Talia but standing next to PAS, Michelle(if that's who she's playing) is gonna look like a freaking drag queen!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So am I the only one who liked PAS?

I wouldn't say I liked Danny, I definitely didn't like the mob stories he was involved in, but I liked PAS' work and he made me care far more about Danny than I should have. I never saw him as the same type of thug like Jason and Sonny, he always seemed more thoughtful to me, most of the time. It was actually a strange time for me when awful NSA took over because I regularly rooted for Danny, who was a mobster, over Michelle, who was supposed to be a legacy character. I liked Danny much better when they tried to pair him with Cassie. I wish that story had gone through.

If Danny is out of the mob for good, then I might not mind seeing him again, although it's going to be an odd fit, because the show has changed a lot since 2004, and they have no real ties to anyone, aside from Rick and Bill.

Does anyone else think we may be getting a Joe Novak ending a la RH? Danny returns long enough to be killed, and then grieving widow Michelle/Siobhan moves back to Riverside/Springfield?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I liked PAS too, not all his storylines, but at this point I'm glad to see him return in hopes that if Michelle and Danny both come back that it may actually open up a door for Ed Bauer to return... my memory may be bad, but I thought when they left the show the characters were going to be with Ed, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As I posted in another thread, I am happy about this. The Santoses are a part of the story of Guiding Light and should be represented as its run on CBS ends.

RoseVioletDaisy, I think it's a no-brainer that they need to try to get Jonathan and Sarah back too for closure for the end of the CBS run. Phillip meets his granddaughter, Jonathan is there for Reva again as she battles cancer, etc. Why would that be something not to want?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Community Posts

    • I think I've heard of this before but I'd definitely like to know more, lol. Probably in the Classic thread if that's preferred by people. I've never been big on Cari Shayne's Karen. But yes, Carrie and Christie Clark have always had me. Like Kimberly as Robin on GH or Erin Torpey on OLTL, there is a core of lived experience with the actor evolving from child to adult and a quiet intelligence in their presence there that makes the character rise above any poor writing IMO.
    • I hear what your saying regarding Carrie Brady's place on the canvas. There is no arguing that. As I think I was saying poorly above, Karen was introduced during a transition period very early in Riche's run (as was Jagger). There were a lot of things that happened during that period that feel very against the soap opera grain. For example, David Langdon, Monica's ex and Dawn's father, arrives in Port Charles in a medical story where Monica inserts herself with the intention of telling David that Dawn was their daughter. David dies suddenly and Monica never reveals this information to David. This feels very untraditional. Similarly, the whole Joseph Adkins arc with Bobbie writing to a murderer and the women of Port Charles all fawning over his book is not something I felt was the type of story soaps in 1992 did. Similarly, introducing a character like Karen without any family ties and anchoring a younger part of the story with another outsider Jagger wasn't how things would typically work (effectively) on the soap.   I think my issue with the idea that Brenda had a direct goal is that is all there was to her. She had nothing to her outside of that in early 1993. Jagger had wanting to find his family. Karen was working to get into medical school. Brenda had Jagger, who only wanted her when he couldn't have Karen. Even Ruby called Jagger out on this. Brenda's point of view was so limited. The fact that she nearly gets bested by Jenny Eckert of all people in a confrontation in March, 1993, is pretty wild given how milquetoast Jenny is.  I can see why you would think Karen was taking a middle of the road approach to things. It might not have been presented well, but her pursuing her career and going to college was going to come first. Working at Kelly's and maintaining her grades was going to come before her romance with Jagger. With Rhonda around, meddling in her life, Karen definitely had more reason to be conflicted. Rhonda saw Karen's relationship with Jason as the key to Karen's success, both by marrying into a wealthy family and by building a network of connections in Karen's career field.  Having watched some of her "General Hospital" run, I would like to at the early years of Karen's run on "Port Charles" to see how that all this continues in terms of her characterization. I think Karen remains very passive romantically deferring to Courtney Kanelos, who was just a much stronger adversary for Karen than Brenda was based on where Brenda was in her journey given that Courtney had Neil which tied her to the entire Scanlon clan. I do remember Karen having some outbursts, but I vaguely think that Shayne's Karen could also be pushed to her limits and she would fire back. This just wasn't her modus operandi as it was for characters like Courtney and early Brenda.  In Brenda's defense, I think part of the issue was the underdevelopment of her character. I think there was an intent on either Levinson's (or Riche's) part to craft Brenda as a "poor little rich girl" type who had no moral compass because her father was a business tycoon who ignored her and had loved Julia's mother more than her mother. If this was true, and the intent to solicit sympathy, or least empathy, for Brenda, it wasn't played enough for this to be effective. Brenda rejected Julia both in terms of her role as a parental figure and any sisterly advice she gave.  I would even go further and say that the issues I have with the Brenda/Karen rivalry were inherit to Bill Levinson's writing. By comparison, if you look at what was being done in the other female rivalries, the issues were mostly consistent. Jenny and Julia, for example, had the potential to be interesting but Julia was so passive and Jenny was sound brash and unfeeling that there was no one to root for. Also, the rivalry between Tiffany and Bobbie took Tiffany into a very narrow view with her solely trying to secure custody of Lucas at the cost of everything else including her friendship with Bobbie and Tony as well as her marriage to Sean. I'd be curious to see if Levinson had similar issues when he was at "Loving," but I'm spacing at the moment.   
    • Neil Patrick Harris and David Burtka talk new show, ‘Drag Me to Dinner’ l GMA  
    • Jimbo & Alexis Spill Tea on Heidi's Drama (Unaired)

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Do these tournaments still test for COVID? https://www.bbc.com/sport/tennis/65794974?xtor=AL-72-[partner]-[bbc.news.twitter]-[headline]-[news]-[bizdev]-[isapi]&at_link_origin=BBCWorld&at_medium=social&at_ptr_name=twitter&at_campaign=Social_Flow&at_link_type=web_link&at_format=link&at_link_id=085D161A-01FB-11EE-91C3-39FFD772BE90&at_campaign_type=owned&at_bbc_team=editorial
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy