Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I can't believe this...creature...will try to bring up Bill's infidelities. First, and this is just my opinion, while he may have sucked as a husband, receiving sexual favors had zero to do with his ability to run the country. Second, he is not running for office, Hillary is. And this really should amount to nothing.

 

And finally, third? If Trump wants to throw that poo around, I hope Hillary will ask him how happy Ivana was when Miss Georgia Peach Marla Maples entered the mix. Hypocritical asswipe. (And show me a faithful politician on either side of the aisle in freakin' decades and I'll show you a Pegasus unicorn that craps rainbow glitter.)

 

 


If this was Joe or Jane Doe, they would be arrested already. Candidate or not, why the hell is Trump exempt?!
 
Lock HIM up!

 
Edited by Wendy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6817

  • DRW50

    5990

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3462

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Trump is completely blind and stupid if he thinks going after Bill and Monica will do anything but harden women and families against him for shaming the woman.

 

I don't want to hear any argument against that idea either - It's not 1992 anymore. People know all about the Clintons. In 2016, if an old man comes out raving about how Hillary didn't satisfy Bill enough, how the Clintons have had trouble in their marriage, all that's going to do is make voters soften towards Hillary even more. It makes her and her marriage more relatable, and it makes Trump look terrible. But he doesn't get it. He thinks he can still play out the 'dominance rituals' Josh Marshall decribed, which Trump imported from the business world to the primaries, where he can run roughshod over anyone to get what he wants. He doesn't get, even now, that Hillary can't be dominated. He's delusional.

 

But I suspect all that may be forgotten by Donald for a bit with this new tax humiliation. #LastTimeTrumpPaidTaxes is trending, and Trump's 80-year-old former tax preparer has verified the documents as legitimate.

 

 

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Alec Baldwin nailed it on SNL tonight as Trump. Kate McKinnon too, "Look, I know you all hate me. You hate my voice and you hate my face. So just elect me President and I swear I will lock myself in the Oval Office for 4 years and never come out. Or don't elect me, and I will continue to run for President every election year until I die." :lol: (that's not an exact transcript but that's the gist)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

On a side note, Roger Stone is tweeting the #WikiLeaks stuff on Clinton coming on Wed and damaging. Of course it could be a deflection because this guy is the king of conspiracy theories. But he also claims he's working directly with Assange.

Edited by JaneAusten
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Yeah I am still waiting for those emails confirming Clinton and Obama armed ISIS. He's been promising to release those for 2 months.

 

They might have something but I expect it to be as ineffective as the DNC stuff was which really did nothing.

 

And Stone was babbling the other day about Brennan being bought off because the entire idea of Russia tampering with our election is a fabrication by Clinton aided by everyone tied to Obama.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The DNC server is what he hacked, right? I think the only damaging stuff on there would be Bernie related, and it would be released in hopes of getting CNN and the Trump campaign to keep discussing the leaked audio (which wasn't even bad when you listen to it or read the transcript). 

 

Where did those Huma and foundation emails come from? Those seemed to give the media a month's worth of material in August. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

A rundown of his speech. It's - well I guess it's about the norm for him, which is sad. 

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/10/02/as-news-of-trumps-taxes-broke-he-goes-off-script-at-a-rally-in-pennsylvania/

 

Meanwhile, first reported in the paper of Trump's son-in-law (which might tell us how they feel...), Fooliani spews more racial positivity at a business dinner, thus further burning away his "mainstream" credibility. TPM had a good analysis of this:

 

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/in-the-bubble--2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

WikiLeaks doesn't hack they disclose info others get. THe DNC stuff was a lot of nothing as was the foundation stuff. Stone basically admitted he and Assange are potentially working to manufacture. He's a huge conspiracy theorist and just blamed our CIA director for making up the Russian break ins to election info. And Assange has been blowing for months on having info. Where is it? My guess is he's been hoping the Russian trolls with their hacking would find something.

 

So now Trump is smart for paying no taxes for 20 years the best ever. Let's forget he lost a billion dollars in a year and his plan wants to again give the top 1% the biggest tax break. Hysterical

Edited by JaneAusten
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Just last week, I read an article written by an Asian American blogger describing how many things Asian Americans dislike about Trump and his proposed policies.

According to this NYT article, Asian-Americans have been trending toward the Democratic party over the past 8-9 years but Trump seems to be accelerating this trend.

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/02/us/politics/trump-asian-american-voters.html

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • What if they were originally cast as Vanessa and Doug's twins and then were moved to Samantha/Tyrell when the show decided to delay introducing the twins? It's a shame they didn't stick with the original plan.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I don't think some of Samantha's hairstyles have worked with the ponytails and bows making her look like an older adult wearing a 10-year-old hairstyle.    Bows work on Kat much better for Kat's age and personal style. We've known since the start that Eva was a hairstylist before she began working for Nicole.  I like that they brought that back, with Ted arranging for her to work at a high-end salon.  Yesterday's scene with Martin bringing Eva over for pizza with his family, and then Eva doing hairstyles for Samantha worked (for me). I did think that the new hairstyle that Eva created for Samantha was less "little girl" and somehow even though more mature, it made the actress Najah look less aged. Can't quite explain it, but she looks better now.
    • That backdoor pilot may have failed, yet one year later "Empty Nest" became a reality anyway, so it wasn't a complete waste of time. 

      Please register in order to view this content

      The show was completely revamped of course, but still....
    • Honestly, either 6-7 and 10-11 would've worked better. But maybe they wanted actors who wouldn't be held to child labour laws and needed them to be able to act, especially if they're (eventually?) going to go with their bio mama showing up (June??). 
    • I thought it interesting that in the Claybon/Manning youtube with Michael Fairman, Brandon Claybon said Samantha and Tyrell were initially supposed to be 6 and 7, but aged up for technical reasons, first aged up to 10 or 11, and then finally to 16 and 17.  (Not sure what "technical reasons" means but that's what he said.) Claybon didn't mention when this decision was made to change the ages of the children. No mention of when this happened during the process of casting/writing/preparation. Just speculating: I wonder if Najah Jackson and Jaden Lucas Miller were cast later than other recurring actors due to this change? - so maybe that's how they selected Ms. Jackson? 
    • Damn, there was a tiny pre-emption where I'm from and I missed the Kat/Nicole scene, according to recaps.
    • That Kristina caused the accident.
    • I'm unclear:  What specifically does Lucky know about Elizabeth's accident and Kristina? 
    • Lucky and Alexis covering up Kristina's crime is disgusting. It makes no sense he'd be covering for Kristina.   Drew's plan to get custody of Michael's children was laughable and lame.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy