Jump to content

The Politics Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

 


Quoting emptywheel:
"These two clips show, I think, that when she has a chance to do that, either what she says or the references she makes or the empathy and leadership she models can be successful in persuading people not just that she’ll put their interests first, but that they’ve been lied to."

 

---

A few more thoughts in a *different* blog post from Emptywheel,
regarding the Univision town halls,
and Kamala Harris being interviewed by Baier on Fox :
https://www.emptywheel.net/2024/10/17/hen-in-the-fox-house-kamala-harris-alludes-to-what-you-and-i-both-know/

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 45.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Vee

    6817

  • DRW50

    5991

  • DramatistDreamer

    5521

  • Khan

    3465

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Oh, they don’t really want her there, especially since she’s from California because the Catholic diocese on L.A. County is in a mess, as they often are known to be.

Catholic Archdiocese of Los Angeles agrees to $880 million settlement over sex abuse of children

VP Harris being a former prosecutor and all, and them shielding so many predators.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Everything with the betting markets seems false. I do think there's been real movement toward Trump, as it seems to be hitting almost every poll, Harris has changed her campaign decisions quite a bit in the last few weeks, and the early voting numbers in places like Virginia, NC, etc. aren't good (although some may just be a natural reversion from 2020), but the only reason these betting markets get so much prominence now is to create a narrative.

 

Even with the blowback, I am glad she skipped the dinner, in large part for the reasons you mentioned. Dolan seems like trash anyway.

One of the problems is a lot of people who vote for the amendment are likely still going to vote Republican - I read an article about how this seems to be happening in Arizona. 

(I'm not saying the amendments still aren't important - sorry if that comes across)

I would disagree with that many people being undecided - I think it's probably closer to 4-5%, and unfortunately many who say they are undecided seem to end up leaning toward Trump. That's what seemed to happen in 2016 and 2020, and his approval ratings are higher than ever now.

Some glimpses of the flyers Musk is spreading in swing states. If you are getting any of the propaganda the media is spreading about how he's a great guy who was just mistreated by Biden, it is probably just the beginning of his bootlickers trying to clean up after him and all the money he's costing them.

 

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't either. It may be tied in the way the polling is being done which understandably makes many of us tense (me included), but I haven't been convinced it'll actually be that close on the night for quite some time. People doing these doomsday scenarios of barely ekeing out a victory with 276 EV or something are deep in their own nightmares to me.

I'm tenser than I was in '20 or '22, but a lot of that has to do with the unusual circumstances of this cycle and the heightened threat post-J6. I've suspected for some time this may look something like the midterms on the night of and we may put it away much earlier than anyone in media had expected.

I think most of that is natural tightening towards the end of a race, and not that surprising given Harris has only been in the race since the end of July. I also think the polling underreports or overweights a lot of groups on account of the assumption of Trump Magic, and early voting that is not going to happen the same way as in the middle of a pandemic.

The rest is PTSD Dems or angry Twitter leftists bedwetting over the One Weird Trick they would do with her campaign instead. Of course I can think of things I would do differently, but I see little serious change in that campaign since two months ago and it's been an insanely rushed timetable.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

By and large, women aren't going to forget how SCOTUS reversed their reproductive rights.  That's going to influence how they vote - not just in this election year, but many others to come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I pray to God I'm anxious for nothing, but Trump is now 1.6% ahead of Harris in Georgia. I'm starting to get uneasy 2016 vibes.

A part of me believes - has always believed - that this country is so entrenched in misogyny that it refuses to vote for a woman for POTUS, no matter how qualified. And that is where foreign nations are well ahead of us.

If I'm wrong and Kamala is victorious? FANTASTIC.

Still, it's devastating to think voters would rather lose democracy and their rights and vote for an elderly dementia-riddled felon because this nation cannot let go of "old white male for POTUS" syndrome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think Georgia and Arizona are both a reach this year, but what reminds me of 2016 is the struggles in the "blue wall" states. I know Politico is biased, but the number of pieces about Michigan and Pennsylvania difficulties is making me wary. The other similarity is how many union members seem to be moving away from the party. A great deal seems to be down to misogyny, but Biden 2020 also papered over a number of cracks the party has been facing in blue collar support, losing support from some black or Hispanic voters, etc. So many also seem to have reverted to the 2016 mindset they had with Trump where they just make him whatever they want him to be and ignore his actual history and the comments he makes today (they also seem to ignore his clearly decayed mental state).

We even have a new version of Julian Assange in Elon Musk, not hiding behind Wikileaks this time but instead using shadow groups to flood the market with endless propaganda against Harris.

https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2024/10/pro-trump-dark-money-network-tied-to-elon-musk-behind-fake-pro-harris-campaign-scheme/

I know it's hypocritical to post these given what Musk has done to Twitter but the thread shows many of the ads he's running against her. One in particular, echoing anti-Semitic talking points that Doug Emhoff is a puppet of Israel and controls Harris, is especially disgusting.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don’t watch most television news in general, so my perspective is likely vastly different from most members in this thread.
It is somewhat interesting to note though, that many newspapers (*coughs* NYT) are starting to publish articles that question the accuracy of polls and note when polls have gone wrong.
Also, I noticed that they recently printed an Opinion essay in which the author dismissed the importance of swing states, claiming that something that they refer to as “microcommunities”. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm glad Obama brought up that incident between McCain and the woman who called Obama an Arab and so forth.  Say what you will about McCain, but I thought his response to that lady - basically shutting her down, as Obama says - was perfect.  Others (like Trump) would've reinforced her ignorance and prejudice, but McCain wouldn't.  Don't get me wrong, I'm glad McCain ultimately lost the election, but if not for the fact that he had an absolute loon for his running mate, I think I would've been okay with him becoming president.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I agree. I really have enjoyed this story from the beginning. I feel like it needed the time for us to care about Doug. They've done a nice job of explaining his motives and making me care for him. I still feel like he's doomed and Vanessa will end up being a widow and now I'm invested in that *not* happening now that I've fallen for him. Friday was good but so was the entire week. I think they're doing such a nice job of keeping things moving. We got good movement with Bill's story this week, Chelsea is attempting to date, Andre and Dani are having tough conversations about their relationship, of course Anita reunited with Sharon. There is *so* much going on and I didn't even cover all of it.  I wish all of the soaps would take a page out of BTG book and start rotating their stories. I love that everybody is getting a chance to shine and they don't just sit on one lead story to the point you get sick of it. 
    • Did Jordan Clarke have a departure sometime between 1985 and 1989? I know Robert Newman had three runs: 1981-1984, 1986-1991, 1993-end.
    • Well, they usually weren't on the show at the time for long until the late 90's. But yeah, they really deserved a story centered on them, and not through the lens of Reva.
    • Chelsea was doing the absolute most today! Why was she introducing her sister to a woman she doesnt know? That whole scene was embarrassing. Madison needs to stay away from her bc she is too immature
    • Gosh, what a waste with Lunacy. Why have her live with $B, reveal Finn, pardon her, etc What makes this story incredibly hollow is that what Luna is asking isn't unreasonable - to spend time with her cousin father. She's not asking to move in with them. How hard with it be for Finn to throw her a bone by, say, I'll meet you for lunch/coffee once at week at the hospital cafeteria. Lunacy isn't going to hurt Finn. In fact, all her crimes were related to finding her father and it turns out to be someone she's loved her entire life. Instead of course-correcting the nonsense of last summer, Brad somehow found a way to make this worse! That's a skill... Of all the younger actors B&B has cast during the past 5 years, LY has shown the most growth and range. Why get rid of her? 
    • On the subject of sets (seems more interesting to discuss than the actual show)  Some sets we don't see anymore Lauren/Michael apartment (haven't seen that in years) Victoria's house (are Marian/Tessa living there?) Apartment above Crimson Lights (I think Chelsea was the last resident) Penthouse (Lily's home) Chancellor Estate (Devon/Abby) Chancellor office (once Dark Horse) Nick's house GCAC room (used as residence/hotel room for several characters) Some of these may pop up again. The tack house,for example, was not seen for many months before being used again. Have I missed anything?
    • Thanks for searching through everything. Worked on them so long, just too lazy to check for those links myself, so I am glad you chose to do it! I guess I never did type out anything for 1973-1977 in regards to the preemptions, but they are on the charts at least (and this far back, they don't seem to do any of those "breakouts" anymore, so things are simpler in the 1970's, so eventually I could type those out). 
    • I dump on the Y&R sets problem all the time, but BOLD is no better -- and they're not even introducing new sets. All of their sets are years old, and very few look like they're inhabited by people with money. Is that going to change with this move? I'd rather they save the money spent on another remote, which is no better than an HGTV travelogue, and get some new/better sets.
    • The donut posts here make up for a Friday show that was barely meh. Aside from seeing Anna, I really didn't care much about anything else. While I understand the thought behind breaking up all the sadness with "other scenes," I'd rather they moved right to John's funeral. Instead of hearing a stupid story about John changing some minor character's tire 20 years ago, just move on to the crying. I also thought the Chad and Cat scenes were a waste. I realize not everyone is devastated by John's death to the point of not functioning, but going sky diving is a choice. By the way, Jack and Jennifer are giving me nothing on this return. Please leave asap. DAYS did such a great job with John's death, so ending the week this way was a letdown.
    • Add Dr. Montgomery to list of fine women on this show! I hope the show goes forward with Madison/Chelsea and then once they're developed, bring back Allison, who is now divorced or a widow, for a Madison/Chelsea/Allison triangle.  It would definitely be the hottest triangle in daytime.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy