Jump to content

Texas! Discussion Thread


Chris B

Recommended Posts

  • Members

This is the development story that I wanted.

AW had been through three failed expansions/spin-offs: Somerset, For Richer, for Poorer, and the 90-minute expansion.  So, why was it chosen, once again, as the source material? 

I wanted to know more context about the culture of daytime TV.  There's a fun detail that the opening party was unusually sumptuous.  So, it might have been fun to hear about the PR roll out.  Why did NBC decide to use another soap rather than a talk show or a game show?  There's no reason given why Texas was put into development.

I wonder if we are capricious? Did too many people complain that the Ryan's Hope book didn't contain enough story synopsis?  And now we are saying there was too much in this book?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 580
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

 A quick look: Gail Kobe, Paul Rauch, Harding Lemay, John Corrington, Judy Lewis, Robert Calhoun, and Beverlee McKinsey have died. From the Texas standpoint, Joyce Corrington is alive, but is she willing/able to talk and does she have memory of all of this considering she's 88? Pamela Long is the only one alive at this point and she has spoken about her time on the show. She also wouldn't know about the creation aspect stuff so we may never know about how the show came to be unless there are people on the AW side who are still alive. And who would they be?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If you haven't caught her Canadian CITY LIGHTS interview, you need to! So candid & her sense of humor on view.

Until last year I'd never seen even one episode of it but my mother was a huge fan & she could not stop laughing at that storyline. She laughed until she cried. And, this was a veteran of NBC soaps & not at all her usual reaction.

I've just barely made a dent in the book but I'm still excited. I waited for the kindle & I think I might have bought the first one.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

NBC daytime was in freefall following Lin Bolen's departure in Feb 76l

Madeleine David lasted a year as VP before Michael Brockman took over in 77.

Lovers and Friends seemed like a sure thing but was a disaster. The decision to take it off the air after 13 weeks  and retool branded For Richer For Poorer as a dud from the get go.

Days and The Doctors were struggling. The Pollocks departing TD and Bill Bell no longer involved at Days seemed to have an affect.

America Alive was a disaster.

There was a series of flop gameshows.

Whatever they had in development(if anything) was probably  dropped when Brockman arrived.

AW was their only top rating soap at that time but expanding and trying a spin off only damaged it.

Had AW stayed at 3pm that timeslot would have been safe and they could have tried a 30 min show at 2pm or 2.30 adjunct to TD with the option of expanding it if it worked or if TD seemed terminal.

Or Days could have moved to 1pm when L&F came along and L&F placed at 2 or 2.30.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I’m done reading the Texas book and ready to pass it on for free, if anyone wants it. It was good. I enjoyed reading it because I watched the show. Like others have said, I wish it had gotten more in depth of the problems that made the show fail. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Couldn't have hurt.

Alex and Iris was supposed to be a sweeping love story but Bert Kramer didn't gel with BM.

Of course the decision to try and turn Iris into a heroine was also a fail.

Donald May was a popular soap star and maybe as Alex the chemistry with Beverlee would have been better,

But Texas had so many issues...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'd agree that that was TEXAS' number-one issue, along with premiering at sixty minutes (too much padding!) and trying too hard to be daytime's answer to DALLAS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

If anyone (who isn't named Megan McTavish) ever needed to write a memoir about their career writing for daytime dramas, it's Patrick Mulcahey.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Thanks for the tip. I'm not even there viewing-wise yet and as I told my co-worker who grew up on DAYS today, I'm just not ready. So I know I'll be a mess when I get to the episode.    Love all of this.
    • People really forget the show started at the end of Feb.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Yeah I just took it as the life Marlena truly wanted and needed started with John that day.  She lived a life before with loves and happiness, but found her soul mate in John.  Besides, I don't expect Marlena to get into semantics of her previous loves with her husband that clearly has little time left. And, yes, @j swift in Salem you just say Happy Anniversary whenever you multi time married friends decide what day they want to celebrate it lol.
    • May 21, 1990 was CBS Monday comedy finale night. Major Dad season 1 finale, Newhart series finale, Murphy Brown season 2 finale, Designing Women season 4 finale. The comedies that were in the 1989/90 Top 10 had their season finales earlier. April 23-29, 1990: Empty Nest April 30-May 6, 1990: The Cosby Show, A Different World, Cheers, The Golden Girls May 7-13, 1990: Roseanne May 14-20, 1990: The Wonder Years
    • I understood it very differently as well. I wouldn't have piled on, but @janea4old and I were clearly composing our posts at the same time (great minds think alike, and fools seldom differ). To me, she was saying that their love was an awakening.  Obviously, she loved Roman and their twins, as well as Don.  But, John revealed something to her that she had never seen before.  I actually think it is a lovely, and very optimistic, idea to think that one's third marriage could be special because you met each other at a specific time in your life. Not to be crude about the departed, but John was trained by the best, and he rocked her world.  Think about it, before Kristin met him, she was just a mild-mannered social worker.  And< I doubt Roman and Kate are doing whatever Doc and John did with those strawberries and cream.  If we translate soap dialogue into reality, that is probably what Marlena meant. Of course, John was only her third husband if you don't count Eugene and 

      Please register in order to view this content

      (aka the husband nobody mourned).  If you choose that definition, John was also her 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th husband.  However, I believe it was @carolineg who reminded us that in polite society, friends just say Happy Anniversary, and don't mention the years in between.
    • I knew that

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • disagree on all counts To me it's obvious that what Marlena meant was that she was already a complete person within herself before meeting John; but after meeting John her life blossomed to a new level she hadn't known before. I don't think she was bound to John as back and forth caretakers. I think she and John were true equals. Roman loved Marlena in his own way but he was somewhat patronizing at times.
    • I agree that she looks good.  I wasn't slamming her, her age or her looks in my last post.  I was just commenting on the fact that her wardrobe and hair gave me Susan Sullivan/"Dharma & Greg" vibes, lol.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy