Jump to content

Knots Landing


Sedrick

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Yeah, Val (and we) needed a sort of breather between the "brain virus" and the Sumner tell-all.  I can't imagine how the latter story would have played had it immediately followed the former.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 3.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members


On Twitter, Robin has expressed her feelings that Dianne was a nothing role, a dud, and she wishes she’d been given more to do on Knots. She said that she wishes she’d waited and had a shot to play Claudia instead.

I am a huge fan of early ‘90s Robin, loved her on Knots, and ITA that she and Michele were a great match. Back then I pictured them in a Darren Star one camera comedy series with Bea Arthur as their mother and Sarah Jessica Parker as their niece.

In Waggett’s book of soap opera lists, he writes that Claudia got her name from Livia of I, Claudius. Siân Phillips played that part so deliciously in the series. I think Claudia was pretty life changing for Kathleen Noone, she was dead set against playing characters like Ellen Dalton ever again. She said in interviews that she wouldn’t take on another soap role unless the character was a bitch. I wouldn’t say that Bette was a bitch, but certainly a flashy soap diva.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'd have to agree with her.  Dianne Kirkwood was little more than a red herring in Karen's stalker story.

Frankly, I think giving Karen a new career as a talk show host was a dumb idea to begin with.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yep and that’s why Dianne didn’t go anywhere, because their focus was on the plot driven stalker storyline. Prior to that on Knots, whatever the business was, took a back seat and the focus was on how that particular job affected the characters personally. They didn’t even need the Jeff character to tell a compelling story. That was a frustrating story for me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This.  I mean, you didn't even need the talk show angle to tell a story about Karen being stalked.  (Besides, we'd been down that road before (sort of) when Phil abducted her).

Ugh, I'm just glad they eventually had Karen quit the show.

It's truly remarkable that KL stayed on the air as long as it did, because the years when the Lechowicks were the showrunners were just the worst, lol.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They are really dragging out Karen's escape. That said, I am enjoying it quite a bit. I love first he sets the place on fire, she escapes, but then she signals down a driver and it turns out to be her kidnapper, and then she runs away from him, and then he crashes his car, and then he manages to get his car in reverse and chases her again! I love this!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If they had simply given her a character to play.  Not a bunch of plot points to tick off people's sheets, but an actual, three-dimensional character.

Who WAS Dianne Kirkwood (beyond being a talk show producer, irritant to Karen and stalking suspect)?  Where did she come from?  How did she get to where she was?  Did she have any family, close friends, mortal enemies?  What made her vulnerable (if she WAS vulnerable)?  What secrets did she keep?  What did she want out of life?  What was stopping her from achieving her goals?  WHO WAS SHE??

Earl and Judy Trent were clearly designed (some might say, ripped off from "Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?") to create conflict for Gary and Val; yet, I feel like I learned more about those two than I ever did about Dianne!

I remember Lynn Marie Latham telling (I think) Lisa Rinna and Ty Treadway on "Soap Talk" that she always worked from story projections, but I think that was bogus.  I don't think her OR her husband ever thought far ahead.

And if they DID need Jeff, they could've done a lot better casting him.  (Chris Lemmon?  Are you [!@#$%^&*] kidding me?)

That's another issue that I have with the Lechowicks - not just on KL, but on all their shows, including when LML worked on Y&R.  The way they cast many of their roles were for the absolute birds.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Interesting that Donald May has been mentioned twice. He's on my dreamcast list for Alan. He was somewhat older than Stewart and Bernau, but he could have played either role. An actor I thought about for Mike was Dan Hamilton. He played a role on GL during the 60s, but enough time had passed that it shouldn't have been a problem. He usually played smarmy characters but it would have been cool if they had gone against typecasting.
    • I like Jed Allan, it has to be someone who can play authority but "good" authority to oppose Alan's bad. As mentioned upthread, can you imagine how it would have been with Alan and Mike against each other, with Roger in the mix. But I would have had Roger, ever the opportunist to try to take advantage of their fighting to make his own headway.  Maybe that could have been the storyline, Mike involved with Alex, but the constant fighting with Alan causes a rift (she like Mike fighting Alan when it is to her advantage, but he can be a bit self righteous and I can see him demanding her to disavow Alan publicly..) so that is how Roger lands in her bed, much to the consternation of BOTH Alan and Mike. I would like to have a woman of a certain age being fought over by two men (really three if you count Alan.
    • Please let May have less garbage time. The Y&R threads have shrunken, whereas I can barely keep up with the Beyond the Gates threads.
    • The Liam cancer story was a failure from day one. It didn't start at point A but at a late point C. My aunt had brain cancer, and it isn't being told properly or correctly.
    • OMG, did Gio look good. Do not get me started on how good he looked. Lord. It's as if the writers realized Lulu had almost no scenes with her mother, so they wrote all this material for a 2-day Lulu/Laura therapy session. It was nice to see them connect, but I scratched my head yesterday when Lulu tried to connect her adoption story to Laura's life. That was a stretch to me, and I sign the writers were working overtime. Today, the script eventually got to the right place, but I thought it was overboard to see Lulu so worked up that she was near tears. That's investment in a story that's become an obsession.  
    • Absolutely is.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I'm on record as being happy about the mature turn with these new writers, but that goes away every time I see Leo, who's apparently as big a favorite under these women as he was with RC. And yeah, Javi could work, but as long as he's with Leo, he sucks, too.
    • I find Javi so obnoxious and almost as insufferable as Leo, but I still think he might have potential.  The show needs to ditch the Leo romance and give Javi some other interests and relationships.
    • Leo is insufferable. Why is he still on this show?  Javi can leave too. He adds nothing to the show. So now Shawn is going to commit a crime?

      Please register in order to view this content

      Everything Leo wears is ugly.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy