Members Ryan Posted October 4, 2007 Members Share Posted October 4, 2007 From Soap Opera Weekly: :angry: :angry: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members jcar03 Posted October 4, 2007 Members Share Posted October 4, 2007 So they are going to play this like DAYS does with Mickey still talk about her but we never see her. L-A-M-E! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members R Sinclair Posted October 4, 2007 Members Share Posted October 4, 2007 Not really surprising. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Y&RWorldTurner Posted October 4, 2007 Members Share Posted October 4, 2007 How disrespectful! They wasted her and drove her away, typical JFP an Frons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Cheap21 Posted October 4, 2007 Members Share Posted October 4, 2007 is this really that such a big shock? She hasnt been used in any real capacity in years. She makes only a handful of apperances a year and nothing significant. SOW is kind of late with this news bc RA confirmed it with the LnL2 fan a few weeks ago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Chris B Posted October 4, 2007 Members Share Posted October 4, 2007 She is an amazing actress who still is very beautiful and I'm sure could rock a storyline. I wish they'd bring back her son played by the fabulous Matthew Ashford. Why no soap has picked him up is beyond me. They seem to love Liz, so why not boost the family? You could also have Audrey working at the hospital. GH are dogs when it comes to the vets. It's not hard to use them occasionally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members dragonflies Posted October 4, 2007 Members Share Posted October 4, 2007 I think I'd retire too if they treated me with the same disrepect. Ugh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members MichaelGL Posted October 4, 2007 Members Share Posted October 4, 2007 For all I know there is no soap opera titled "General Hospital" right now, and hasn't been for quite some time. This only validates the fact furthermore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DaytimeFan Posted October 4, 2007 Members Share Posted October 4, 2007 UGH Rachel Ames carried GH for years and this is how she is forced to leave? Silently without any sense of conclusion for Audrey. PATHETIC. Shame on Guza and JFP...but especially that evil Frons. When will he realize that growing older is not a disease that young people find repellent and more importantly the fact that he too will get older and be replaced by someone more ageist than he is! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Dr. Jay S.W. Posted October 4, 2007 Members Share Posted October 4, 2007 She RETIRED! Wanna blame JFP and Frons and them for something? Blame them for not writing for her while she was there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members R Sinclair Posted October 4, 2007 Members Share Posted October 4, 2007 I agree. People do retire. They're called "working" actors because they're working. I don't get why people feel that school teachers, bus drivers, secretaries, etc. all can retire without all the conspiracy theories, but actors are expected to work until their last dying breath at the age of 102. There are a lot of things we don't know that went into her decision. All of this speculation about her getting pushed out, shoved out, forced out, waaaaaay out is just giving people something to bitch and moan about to Frons & Co. RA could've wanted to not work at all anymore. She could've wanted to relocate. I say just wish her a blessed and joyful retirement, she deserves it, and move on. Getting upset over our own drawn conclusions about things we know very little about is truly a waste of energy. I agree -- blame JFP & Guza & Frons for not writing for Audrey while RA was still there. But, considering the fact that we can't change history and she's already retired... that's kinda pointless, too. Just my not so humble opinion. Good Morning! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members JackPeyton Posted October 4, 2007 Members Share Posted October 4, 2007 ^i agree. Yes they should have wrote for her when she was there. But they didnt force her to retire. Over th years there have been plenty of actors on GH that the writers didnt feel the need/want/desire to write for. they wanted to write for certin people. thats there decision. She chose to "leave". id say shes been gone for years but whatev Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members R Sinclair Posted October 4, 2007 Members Share Posted October 4, 2007 I considered her "gone" the minute she was placed on recurring and removed from the old Faces of the Heart title sequence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members MichaelGL Posted October 4, 2007 Members Share Posted October 4, 2007 Well you guys do have a point there, but didn't they do the same thing with Anna Lee though? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members NYC123 Posted October 4, 2007 Members Share Posted October 4, 2007 I don't blame her! What did they use her for? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.