Jump to content

AMC: Brooke or Dixie?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Controversial topic here. We've lost two beloved characters, Brooke and Dixie, in the last few months. One just faded into the background, the other met her maker through a bad batch of pancakes.

None of us want to see any of the veterans cut loose. However, if you were TPTB, and you had to make a decision as to whom to kill off in order to spike up the ratings, who would go?

"Both" or "neither," is not a valid answer in this thread. Naming another character isn't valid either. (Sorry Babe haters. :P) You MUST choose either Brooke or Dixie and state your reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I'd kill off Brooke BUT I'd give Julia Barr the biggest story in daytime with Brooke finding out she has cervical cancer and dying after a year's valiant battle, with family at her side. The story would be absolutely paced and ultra realistic and would showcase Barr's brilliance with the aim of taking its audience on an emotional & spritiual journey with Brooke as she prepares to leave this life. I'd make sure all characters would be profoundly affected by Brooke's illness. Erica would be humanised, Adam would plunge into a dark state, Tad & Jamie would be destroyed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think killing Dixie has a greater short-term impact, especially since she's been involved in front-burner story for a year. Killing Brooke would have been equally as outrageous, but she had been backburnered for quite some time before she left. Both departures, of course, are nails in AMC's coffin in the long-term because they are stabs in the back to loyal viewers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I like Marland's idea....

It would be a great story and way for Julia to showcase her talents.

I think the main issue I have with Dixie is the timing. She was brought back from the dead and died again only 1 year later right before the Tad/Dixie/Kate reunion.

It'd be almost easier for fans to get over Brooke's death right now bc she hasn't had anything to do for like 5 years and is rarely seen - and only really has Jamie as real family. So as much as I'd hate it, it would make more sense to kill off Brooke. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I hope nobody shoots me for saying this--but if I had to kill off 1 character to "spike the ratings," I'd kill off Dixie. Reason being that AMC has for years backburned Brooke. Dixie's return to AMC (as botched as it was) garnered a LOT of press. So her death may generate a ratings boost. That said, I'm not happy AMC killed off Dixie and wrote off Brooke with no fanfare. But if I had to choose---Dixie it is :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would give Brooke her own story, like cancer and have her die from it. It would be told in real time, not like she discovers it in two weeks and dies. She would go through the greiving process. She would have scenes with all those close to her like Tad, Jamie, Adam, Dixie, JR, Erica, Jack etc. When she passes, special guest star John Callahan (Edmund Grey) would lead her to Heaven.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Brooke, even though she has been one of my favorite characters. It's obvious the writers were never going to write for her again in a meaningful way. She had no story for years, no love interest and if Brooke died, Julia Barr and her character could have gotten the send-off they both deserved (as well as the fans). Now she is just up in the attic with Ruth Martin I guess.

Dixie still had a lot of story to tell and it was just starting to be told - getting a job, finding a place to live, getting her life back together, reuniting with Tad and finding Kate, when she was killed. If finding Kate when she was dead was supposed to be the payoff, I want my money back with interest!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Dallas peaked early, IMO. Maybe not a fair statement as I’m still making my way through the first half of its run, but I think it’s hard to argue to point that S3 into S4 was its high point. Back to Knots. Wrapping up “And Never Brought to Mind.” Greg’s introduction kinda took me by surprise. I low-key dreaded his arrival bc I know he very quickly gets to the center of the show, but even though they wasted no time connecting him with Mac, Abby, Gary, and Karen, it still feels like a gradual intro. The juxtaposition of the ending of the Chip story with the heating up Abby’s plotting is quite symbolic of the changes the show was going through. I absolutely cannot imagine Kenny and Ginger having any part in any of this. Yall, the Gary/Val piano theme that they pull out from time to time is my FAVORITE. I find myself humming it constantly.
    • Bloodshed is inevitable now. It’s another reason I’m glad Black people aren’t getting involved in these protests. As awful as this is, I keep reminding myself that 54 percent of Latino men voted for Trump. These people were put in harm’s way by members of their own communities and sometimes even members of their own families. Too many people decided to touch the stove.
    • Maybe I'm still in denial, but nothing about Neighbours' ongoing social media output gives the vibe of a show that's ending. In today's 'Roundup' video, Alan Fletcher referenced that production finishes in five weeks, but in all the show's posts the cast are as jovial and lighthearted as ever. Remarkably so for people who are about to lose their jobs.    Perhaps they're just putting a brave face on things, and I know they approached the previous axing with a positive attitude. Maybe putting an upbeat face on things is a collective way of showing potential backers that there's still life in the show? Or is it possible that they already know the show has been saved, and we'll get an announcement next month when filming wraps and the show 'rests'?   Does any of that make sense?!
    • A very good week for male eye candy on GH. New Michael is beautiful, Curtis's arms looked great in that polo shirt, Cody looks even more handsome with his new haircut AND we got Marco in swim shorts rocking his lovely bod and chest fur. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Yeah when Jamey Giddens did breakdowns for DAYS, he would sometimes state in tweets that specific things were his idea that he had pitched to Ron.
    • I don't, since they've clearly incorporated them into Tomas' storyline, and I happen to like his tattoos, but his jackets not fitting doesn't mean they're trying to cover his tattoos. The clothing overall isn't the issue; it's the fit. And I expect(ed) more from Jeresa Featherstone and her team. Very disappointed. He's the only male, overall, whose costume irritates me.
    • "And OMG, watching the scenes of Roger's return in comparison...the quality in the writing really nosedived. The stupid mask." Very much agreed.  Having Roger hide behind a mask for weeks/months, with it culminating with him swinging in on a vine at Blake/Phillip's wedding....geez.  So juvenile. IMO, Guiding Light never did a good job reintroducing major characters, either from the dead or elsewhere.  Masked balls = awful.  Amish = awful. When Reva was brought back from the dead, she should've just showed up in Springfield as Reva, and informed everyone that she had been gone for years because she felt like it.  She had a four-year fling with some dude who ended up dumping her due to disloyalty. Josh would be pissed and declare that their love is not *always* but *sometimes* and he'd act accordingly.  Her kids would hate her.   
    • Agreed. The Emmys next year are gonna be a pretty tough competition and I hope we get a Days sweep lol  Not only does Deidre deserve a nomination for these last few weeks, but I also think Paul Telfer, Raven Bowens, Carson Boatman, Dan Feuerriegel and Alison Sweeney have good chances as well.
    • It’s not about a lack of faith and trust in MVJ, it’s about a a lack of faith and trust in Ron Carlivati, who I think can be very sneaky and manipulative when he wants to be.  And, all that “He’s just a breakdown writer” talk never changed my mind about anything, because at Days, it was “just a breakdown writer” that gave us some of the worst episodes I’ve ever seen. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy