Jump to content

Days: Friday, December 29th


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 99
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Are you kidding? EJ didn't rape Sami?

So did Sami not rape Austin in 1995? I mean, she drugged his drink, but he chose to drink it right, so I guess it wasen't rape. Marlena chose to befriend Kellam a year before the rape, she chose to work for him during the campaign, so I guess that wasen't rape either. It's like saying it's not molestation because a child chooses to interract with the adult beforehand. That's bullshit. It doesn't matter whether she had a choice between that and letting Lucas die. She did not want to do it, he forced her hand. It's rape.

"Labeling it" is what drives the storyline IMO. It's hard to choose what to do with the storyline if they don't know whether to have Sami say EJ forced himself on her or if she did it willingly. If they say she did it willingly, then Lucas will be pissed. If they say she was raped, that brings a whole new level to it (and IMO the most heartbreaking and interesting one).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, it depends on what sense of the word "rape" you mean.

If we're talking physically, then no, E.J. didn't rape Sami. Technically speaking, and from Sami's p.o.v., maybe he did. But E.J. did not even verbally threaten to harm Sami if she didn't agree to sex with him.

So again, it all depends on your definition of rape, because even though she didn't want to, Sami was in no physical danger if she didn't consent to having sex with E.J.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Do a Google on rape and see the various descriptions. I choose to believe when a man has a gun on a woman, dragging it across her face and on her body, sneering and making vulgar and salacious remarks and telling her outrageous things, well, that is even worse than rape of some types in my opinion. It was torture, threats, and clearly no escape for Sami if she said no which she would have except for Lucas being injured and needing help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Please, that's the Gloria Allred definition of rape. Anyone can call anything rape if they try hard enough. But remember: Sami had no reason to trust that EJ -- a DiMera and attempted murderer and general bad guy -- would actually help Lucas. The ball was in her court, and for whatever reason, she trusted that he would help Lucas. It was her choice to have sex. He convinced her by promising to save Lucas' life, but he did not rape her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sex under duress/coercion is rape. This is a fact.

EJ had a gun and told her Lucas was going to die if she didn't sleep with him, and by the look on Sami face you could tell she was only doing it for Lucas. She was disgusted.

EJ raped Sami, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Using any form of coercion to obtain sex is rape. It does not matter if that coercion is physical or mental.

EJ locked her in a car, pulled a gun on her and threatened her life. He then exploited her blind terror over Lucas possibly dying. To suggest that she had any real 'choice' in such a situation is absurd. He knew it was rape. She knew it rape. Moreover, the claim that there was no violence involved is patently untrue. Just a few minutes before the incident, he was holding a gun inches from her face! She was his prisoner in a confined space. Violence clearly played a significant role in the eventual rape.

The notion that rape has to involve physically pinning the victim's arms and legs down is an archaic stereotype. If the perpetrator knows that the victim is not in a position to consent and goes through with the sexual act anyway, that is rape...whatever means that perpetrator uses.

BTW: The official DAYS site at SONY refers to the incident as rape in its daily recap. Sami also refered to it as rape just before it happened. That was clearly how the incident was intended to be portrayed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What EJ did to her was rape. It doesn't matter whether she wanted to or not, that gun determined it was rape. When he held her a gunpoint, that forced her to have sex with him. I think EJ was doing that to ensure she would have sex with him. He raped her. Simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

IMO, these are the same people that said they would stop watching because Steve and Kayla weren't back together as sooon as they came back and being in the spotlight. Truth of the matter is, they say they will stop, but they won't.

One consistent I do see while looking at other boards is the amazing acting from James and Ali.

The "incident" (to remain from labeling this debate) was IMO not shown so that there would eventually be redeeming qualities and so much can come from this for both characters.

It was a horrible situation to put the characters in, but being the biased James Scott fan that I am (yep, I admit it) I still love EJ. But I do know that what Elvis (what I call him when I am pissed) was totally wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I feel like I need to distance myself from JFS on this one. I was not making the argument that it wasn't rape because I buy into the archaic idea that if a woman isn't beaten to a pulp or threatened with death she wasn't raped. I'm fully aware that rape comes in many forms and doesn't always (or even most of the time) involve a frothing stranger. But at its root is the fact that rape involves either the inability to say no (whether because of a perceived threat or another reason) or because the no is simply ignored and/or physically overpowered. I maintained that in my opinion, Sami was aware she had the option to say no but that, given Lucas's chances of survival without EJ's help, it was simply a not a choice she was willing to make. I absolutely understand how others would see it otherwise.

But, and it's a big one, it's since been brought to my attention that Sami herself calls it rape, which pretty much makes my perception of events a moot point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think Ponz phrased it perfectly. The man was armed, and had waved the gun as a threat. He warned her if she ever brough a hand to him again, that she would regret it, basically. On top of this, she had the choice of whether to do what EJ wanted to possibly help Lucas, and save his life, or to wait for a rather grim and hopeless someone else coming along. He ronly other glimmer of hope was when she was helping EJ get passed the cops. If she'd tried to turn it around on him then, she knew she'd be dead. On top of that, she referred to it as rape, and she was crying while he touched her. Say what you will about perception, but we know what the intention was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It was rape. EJ wanted a DiMera-Brady baby, and did what he had to do to make it happen. What I hope for this story, is there is no "who's the daddy" story. Let EJ be the father, and go from there. And I don't think I can take Lucas and the rest of the Bradys screaming at Sami when this

is revealed, especially Lucas. If he doesn't believe her, and tells her she is no good, and can't be trusted, his mother was right...yadda, yadda, yadda; i can never root for them as a couple again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
    • Okay, why are Paulina and Abe sleeping like that?!  I'd take a screen grab if I wasn't lazy, but come on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy