Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Oh, I agree it's not simple.  And it was played with complexity, as it should have been.  But Smitty still used Martin. No way to deny that.  I only wish Martin would have said, "I give up," walked out the door, and slammed it behind him. Leaving Smitty to stew in his own juices.  The entire thing is as complex as Hell.  But Smitty is certainly no longer the poor put-upon victim in this relationship.    

Edited by Tisy-Lish
  • Members
Posted

hahaha! No. We have been discussing this since Week 1/2...it deserves to be announced and pop up on the side of the page for everyone who was waiting for it to happen. Or even IF.  

  • Members
Posted

Same.  What happened made sense to me.  Smitty told him, "I love you" and "Wanting you doesn't mean I trust you."  

Poor Ted, with all the gambling going on at Bare Minimum Boulevard.  However, Miss Nicole's attractive ass definitely understood what he was saying.  He ain't as bad as Bill, and the Duprees heap Dupraise on Bill (whenever they need something from him).  

  • Members
Posted

It's hard (no pun intended) to just walk away when the feeling hits.

Please register in order to view this content

I hear you, though. 

 

 

  • Members
Posted (edited)

This is all I’ve ever wanted for my gay characters on soaps.

I’m really going to have to go back and rewatch Ted read Bill and the Duprees down. I think I can finally stop calling Keith muted after the recent  Leslie scenes and today’s scenes.

Edited by Antoyne
  • Members
Posted

I really loved their scenes today. They had been playing longing so well the last few weeks. So much so I am not ready for them to get back together yet. I do respect that at least Martin (unlike his daddy) is showing interest in getting back together. I liked him being assertive...not arrogant...though ole arrogant Martin popped out near the end. Him and Smitty came across as the typical soap couple in those scenes and it's long overdue to see that in a daytime gay couple. So now back to waiting...hehe smh.

 

Speaking of Ted, I'm starting to wonder given the synopsis for the week if Nicole is about to do the same with him that Smitty did with Martin today. 

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • This is DAYS, the show that said you could brainwash anyone with simple kitchen appliances.  An actor's nail polish or lack thereof should be the least of our concerns, lol.
    • It was not that she wasn't wearing nail polish, it is that she managed to get a manicure in prison
    • "We're Knot Done Yet": the name of this lovely podcast AND what JVA tells her plastic surgeon at every appointment. In other news, Michele Lee is reminding me more and more of my old music teacher from elementary school, and I couldn't STAND that bitch.
    • I apologize if this has been covered already, but does anyone know whether Douglas Marland was HW'ing by that point?  If he was, then I see what he meant when he said (in so many words) that he had inherited a mess when he started at GH.  Aside from Alan and Monica, none of that material seems very promising.  The story with Mark Dante and the Corbins is the wrong kind of predictable (y'know, the kind where you know what's going to happen, but you just don't give a crap?), the stuff with Scotty and Laura is cute but toothless, I don't know WHAT the hell Gina and Steve Carlson's character are arguing about and Rick Webber has to be the dumbest man alive not to see David Hamilton practically twirling his moustache over how to make a killing off Lamont Corbin's declining health.  (By the way, "LAMONT CORBIN"?  What is this, "The Shadow"?  And "Corbin Limited" sounds like some jive I'd hear over on Y&R.) In a way, it's kind of like watching today's GH, right down to the dialogue that's serviceable and pushes plot along but says nothing about the characters' inner lives.
    • It absolutely was; the narrative was there, and they followed it promptly. Maybe that's back when women had babies at young ages?!?!?
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Thanks for asking that!  Back when we had another major event upcoming (a party or the concert), I had intended to ask what everyone here was planning to wear.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Lol. Right?  I mean the show could have framed the 60th anniversary in a different way, but the narrative was celebrating Tom and the hospital. Also, what a weirdly sexist bunch of posts about women's nail polish.  Like, yes, this is Days problem lol.  Stacy Haiduk isn't a good Kristen because she doesn't wear nail polish?  Are we in the 1950's???
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy