Jump to content

DAYS: R.I.P. Drake Hogestyn (John Black, Days of our Lives)


Errol

Recommended Posts

  • Members

As always @dc11786 you have made great points and thank you for the insightful post.

A few things I would touch on to reply is that:

-I do believe Drake was fired when he was killed off.  Deidre said in a few interviews she was hysterical after those scenes and thought that was the end of Marlena/John.  I can't imagine how she feels now.  So, even if the plan was always to bring John/RoboJohn back I don't think the actors were aware of it.  Someone may know better than me, but that's how I took the public statements made at the time.

-I really do see your argument of stripping down the show without the weight of supercouples and sci-fi, but Days went too far, IMO.  It became almost unrecognizable and it was jolting.  I don't think that period without them was bad really, it just lacked the core of what I loved about Days.  Although I have had numerous people tell me that they did really enjoy this era.

-Maggie vs. Marlena isn't really a thing to me.  It did seem clear to me they gave much more prominence and value to SR after Deidre left, but as you said, they don't really fill the same roles on the show.  It was nice to see SR get some meaty material after years of being an afterthought.

-I actually think the return of CC as Carly wasn't the shot in the arm the show was hoping for.  I admittedly hate the character of Carly so can't be objective.  I think it's pretty obvious her return really flopped with viewers though.

-I had no problem with Ali being bumped to lead as it seemed like a natural progression.  I do think her real life pregnancy did make it difficult even though, as you stated, the Sydney switch was the best story in years.  After dumping John/Marlena I would have probably really tried to woo Christie back as Sami vs. Carrie is what the show should have focused on.

-I tend to agree the idea of 2011 re-boot was great, but the show didn't have solid stories for the returning actors.  The John/Marlena plot about John losing his money over insider trading or something was boring.  Carrie/Austin didn't really have a lot to do.  It did seemed like the show was focused on getting these characters back first and then writing later.  John/Marlena's story was pretty dull until Kristen showed up again.

-I will always like Melanie.  Yes, she got a lot of story, family and love interests and I can see how it would be annoying to some, but she brought a freshness and vitality to the younger set.  I do love Rachel Melvin and Shelly Hennig as well.  I also agree Kristen Renton was good.  It's a shame it was widely gossiped she was sleeping with upper management because I liked Morgan. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 394
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I remember when they killed off John near the end of the Sheffer era. I agree, it was real. I was stunned then and stunned when they very unceremoniously wrote him and Marlena out under Higley not long after. The shockwaves around SON at the time were legit too, IIRC. I liked the idea of the relevant white collar crime story around their and Carrie/Austin's return in 2011, but I am often an apologist for the early part of that era. As with most things Days they didn't know how to play it out.

I also always liked Molly Burnett at least. She took too much grief from Daytime Confidential at its peak, but all I saw was a talented actress on a bad show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Higley seemed to hate John/Marlena or at least Marlena lol.  It was so disappointing to watch John be RoboJohn for so long and then he gets his memory back a day before they leave.  And he's paralyzed.  It was an awful way for them to go out.  

The 2011 John/Marlena white collar story I suppose could have been good.  I liked it brought Carrie/Austin in to help them fight the charges.  Unfortunately, it was boring to me and I don't think that's exactly Deidre and Drake's bread and butter as a couple.  Wacky life threatening villains are for better or worse.

I totally forgot Daytime Confidential used to rip Molly Burnett.  I think that's why I thought she was universally hated.  Not anything to do with this thread, but it's strange how both Melanie and Chelsea became footnotes basically in Days history when they were dominating so much screen time a decade or so ago.

Edited by carolineg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It truly was.  It makes me mad all over again.  For those two to go out with a re-marriage in a hospital room and John with paralysis?  Ugh.  At least it was rectified a few years later, but I remember being furious at the time.  It showed such little respect for Deidre/Drake and Marlena/John who help carry the show for decades.  And of course both of them handled it like class acts (at least publicly).  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
DRAKE HOGESTYN...FIRST LISTING ON "DAYS" CRAWL PRODUCTION PAPERWORK, EPISODE # 5149 (1/27/86)...
 

Please register in order to view this content

 
DRAKE HOGESTYN...WORKING WITH THE MARLENA DOUBLE WHILE DEIDRE HALL WAS TAPING "OUR HOUSE", EPISODE # 5256 (6/26/86)...
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Not to go too off topic but Shortland Street made this same choice with their leading man of 20 years, TK Samuels. Even worse, because not only was he paralyzed, but his final scene was him trying to stand up to make an inspirational speech, only to fall to the floor. Any time he's mentioned by his relatives it is just to say how much he is struggling and how unhappy he is. 

Back to John, I remember thinking they wanted rid of him around 2007 too. Or at least Sheffer had no use for him. Wasn't he in a coma for a while after EJ shot him? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

2006-07 was that weird period where they were trying to figure out the budget but hadn't yet. They had John in that coma for a while after EJ shot him, and they were constantly side-lining the vets for months on end, either to save money explicitly or to test how the show would run without them. So I fully believe that John was supposed to be out-out when they killed him off in 2007. The culmination of all this was when Tomlin instituted the new production model in 2008, which led to the belt-tightening and the exits of John, Marlena, Steve, and Kayla in early 2009 (onscreen). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I liked Chelsea at certain points in her run.  I will say it's to Rachel Melvin's credit that Chelsea ever became semi-rootable after killing her little brother.  Not really on topic, but it's very strange the show went to all the trouble to retcon J.T. into Bo's kid only for Chelsea to mow him down and he surprisingly never should up alive again lol.

Yes he was in a coma for months right before he was killed off.  Marlena would weep at his bedside and have dreams of her and John being together and it was extremely corny.  Marlena was still used sparingly with other characters, but half her scenes were arguing with Drs telling her to pull the plug on John or having this idiotic dream sequences.    I felt like Sheffer either didn't like John or just didn't know how to write for John/Marlena as a couple.   I think Sheffer wanted to make Marlena darker and she was a bit after John's death vowing revenge on Stefano and all that.   Since John was only gone for a few months I have a feeling the network or some higher up may have stepped in and forced HS to write Drake back in.

Yes, they also got rid of Marlena's penthouse set around this time (2007) because it was too expensive.  Marlena just moved out and sold it off screen while John was in a coma and I was so devastated because I still miss that set!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I remember really enjoying the period after John was “killed” and returned as RoboJohn. Deidre had some incredible scenes, including threatening Stefano. It was the first time I felt stakes for anyone after the cartoon of Melaswen. Drake also got to play something new, and it was fun watching both of them.

My only problem with that period of time they were gone was the show should have stabilized Bo and Hope and let them have adventures together. Even in a small scale solving local crimes. Utilizing Maggie was wonderful, but they could have helped it from feeling like Sami all the time. And even that was more like EJ all the time.

But there was a hole in the heart of the show. Drake should have always had a place and I was happy to see him when they brought him back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Yes from when they went on Let’s Make a Deal too. Pam stole Forrester designs for Jackie M. Of course a month later we saw Nick, Lesley, Owen, and Bridget all exit in the same episode.
    • Great pairing that seemed to come out of the blue! Around that time, it felt like Sheffer/Goutman didn’t really know what to do with Emily or Hal. And KM and BH had surprisingly great chemistry. It was good for Emily especially because she was coming off those unsympathetic years with the Tom affair and then running the Intruder and essentially just being a busybody.
    • I think the issue with Lulu is less the character (which was the issue in the Julie Berman days under Guza II) and more the lack of nuance. The current GH team rarely writes nuance for any character or at least can't sustain it for long, or they reserve it for a favored few. I also think the rooting interest at GH BTS often remains on preferred characters or actors - BLQ/Setton - vs. Laura's kids. So it's easy to make Lulu the heavy if you think Brook Lynn and Chase are the money on this show. I don't, but I think FV does. And that's not to say I think Amanda Setton is bad in the role, or that I would get rid of BLQ. I don't trend towards either (though I do think that if Setton's personal beliefs keep getting in the way of material I would reluctantly recast). I think Brook Lynn is essential to use as a lead presently. But I don't think it needs to be the black and white dichotomy of suffering young matriarch BLQ and aggressor Lulu. While it's good that unlike in the Guza years they can recognize that Lulu can be obnoxious and rash, can be her own worst enemy and that that is part of the character, it can be toned down or given more layers than it has of late. There's nothing wrong there the writing can't fix.
    • 1999: I just watched it. It felt so primetime. La Lucci is making history. Aretha's daydreaming segment. @Contessa Donatella Thank you, my love. So helpful and informative as always. adding them to my queue.
    • I know this isn’t a usual or anywhere near universal take, but I loved the relatively brief Hal/Emily relationship/marriage more than I ever thought I would have with KMH/BH.
    • In my field (not that) I've written my share of dreck when it's what people wanted vs. something good. In the end what matters is the check. These pilots may not be great, but whether or not those writers intended otherwise they got paid.
    • I think there is plenty to critique and/or roast about the show, but I think there's also good bones and a lot of progressive improvement. It's the Bell/B&B formula and house style that is hardest for it to shake and the most necessary IMO, as well as some dead weight actors or characters, but that formula also apparently works for a lot of general viewers and I suspect CBS. OTOH it's also very modern in certain ways (sometimes overly hip dialogue, and some story) that still make it feel like a show that's bouncing between distant past staples of soap opera fundamentals and the present moment. And the old fashioned product placement is fun but also so goofy, while material like June is hysterical. Imagine leading with 'the underpass is where I live, and I like it there!' It's an unusual show in that way, because its identity and tone is still not fully formed. You don't know what it'll be. But that's normal at this juncture. The closest thing to a glimpse of the future foundation, I think (besides the obvious core family setup that's been there since Day 1), is the rivalry and future familial bond - and likely love/hate relationship - between Kat and Eva. A la many central sisters or siblings throughout soap history.
    • I loved Kelley Menighan! She was an MVP, especially during the show’s last few years. I always looked forward to anything she did with MM, BH, CZ, MW,  and the two grownup Alisons. Wasn’t a big fan of her with RH’s Paul. I always admired how she balanced being a vixen and being neurotic.
    • LLC can be a lot (lady definitely doesn’t phone it in), but her scenes with Rena made me wish they played actual sisters on a better platform.  Aside from JE, who is a legend so it’s no surprise when she’s excellent, Amanda Setton is my MVP of this story and she hasn’t always been great in this role. You see so much happening in her face as she’s navigating the shifts and layers of this story. She’s fully locked in. Glad Rory Gibson is getting his due on GH. I knew he had more to give than what Y&R was giving him. The writing will be a factor here as well because the character of Michael hasn’t been written well in ages (if ever, arguably). GH just can’t sustain the good stuff for more than a few weeks. Alexa Havins is a very good actress and was widely embraced as Lulu initially, but the character’s one-note abrasiveness has a lot of folks wishing she was gone at this point. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy