Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 88
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members
Posted (edited)

 

I want this to be a success. However I want quality production and story. I do not want something that taints AMC's legacy. 

These movies have no producer or writer attached yet. I would feel better if they  worked out those details before announced this project. 

Edited by John
  • Members
Posted (edited)

I don't expect a Lifetime TV movie to be all things to all people. It has maybe 90-100 minutes runtime, it won't tie up a ton of loose ends and it will be self-contained; it won't do everything I want or anyone wants. But it can be a nice return. And my preference for AMC (or any ABC soap) would be for it to return to streaming in a regular weekly or seasonal format. But it can't be denied that cable TV movies like the Lifetime franchises do well and have a considerable lifeline. And it's pretty likely most AMC stars would make themselves available for something like that. So I can't see why anyone would want to tamp down expectations for either this or The Gates.

The fact is that any new soap opera programming is bound to be compared to the other vastly inferior shows on air right now, whether they are direct timeslot competitors or not. If GH, DAYS, Y&R or B&B look bad next to The Gates or a series of Lifetime movies, that is those shows' problem. Maybe they should try not being consistently bad.

Which, I think we're all agreed, would thrive In this environment same as GL. It's just very sad ATWT has lost some key veterans like Kathryn Hays or Liz Hubbard in recent years.

"Pine Valley" had names attached and went nowhere. Which was probably for the best, judging what we heard about its tone and focus. I think it was going to end up a tryhard hackjob. You can say a lot about Lifetime but they're not trying to compete with Riverdale.

Edited by Vee
  • Members
Posted

At least Lifetime will have some kind of budget for it as opposed to if it were on daytime.

I read it's called "Christmas in Pine Valley"

I wonder if it will feature any of the kids now grown? Like Spike, Ian, Gabi, etc 

  • Members
Posted

I know Deadline is claiming "Christmas in Pine Valley” is a title, but I'm honestly not convinced this is not some classic 'reporting on the soaps' lazy Googling since there apparently is already a Great American Family movie by that name from 2022. (The nerve!)

  • Members
Posted

At this stage of the game, with soaps finally getting some energy back and showing signs of life (The Gates), I think this is the most wonderful news. If it's successful it really can be a hint to the people in charge that AMC is still alive and breathing, reading to be unleashed once again.

I want to see a re-started cancelled soap in my lifetime. These past few years EVERYTHING is getting a re-start, it's so in fashion, that I think it's time soaps benefit from this retro nostalgia. 

And even if it's just a bunch of movies - I applaud the idea. 

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Seeing this as anything other than a positive/win is insane to me, but whatevs. I absolutely 100% mentioned this as a perfect way to continue GL and ATWT back in the day (do not make me go find the posts!), so to see it actually happening with AMC is incredible.

To me, in several ways, this is almost (almost) better than it returning as a regular series. No need to worry about the regular ratings race (or whatever it is for streaming), no constant cast comings and goings, no aimless storylines going on and on, no complaints about front burner/back burner characters, etc. If it moves forward, we know we’re getting two complete movies telling two complete stories. If they’re a success, maybe we get more. If they’re not a success, we are losing nothing. It just seems to be a much safer, less stressful way to bring back a show that last aired over a decade ago and primarily appeals to an older audience.

To me, it’s exactly the same as when the likes of Perry Mason, Gunsmoke, Eight is Enough, The Waltons, Dallas, Murder She Wrote, The Rockford Files, and Hart to Hart returned as movies in the 80s and 90s. If our soaps join that canon of classic TV franchises, I am thrilled because right now, they are just collecting dust. GL and ATWT have basically faded into obscurity at this point.

Edited by All My Shadows
  • Members
Posted (edited)

Eight is Enough and Hart to Hart are interesting analogies because both movies picked up exactly where they left off years earlier.  Arguably they were watched by fewer people, and certainly they were on the air for a shorter time.  Which is why I am so intrigued by the question, will the AMC writers feel the need to re-introduce the characters? 

For example, I'm sure we'll get the typical dialogue where characters unnaturally and unnecessarily reference each other's connection (i.e. "Hey cousin Joe!" or "If that's what you want, Mother").  But, will they need some newcomer who needs to be educated on the history of the Chandlers, the Martins, and Courtland Industries? 

Personally, I'd love it to focus on Tad's daughter, Jenny because she is the nexus of so much history. They have a huge creative task of balancing nostalgia with attracting a new audience, and I am tuning in just to see how they pull it off.

Edited by j swift
  • Members
Posted

I think what benefitted all those primetime shows is that they were in daily reruns basically since they went off the air, meaning anyone tuning in to a reunion movie would have most definitely been familiar with all the characters. I think in the case of AMC, it would be wise to find a balance between spelling out connections and letting the new audience figure it out. No one tuning in needs a play-by-play of the Martin family history. Returning viewers already know it, and new viewers will need to know only what they need to know for the storyline of the movie(s). I wish the show still had an “official” home on the web that curious new viewers could be directed to in order to learn all the history. They can’t exactly promote the numerous YT channels with old episodes.

  • Members
Posted

Lifetime has put out some ridiculous content, they've also occasionally put out some good content. But, whatever Lifetime has done recently is far more interesting to sit through than anything any soap scribe has put on the air in the last decade.

If any soap would be prime fodder for Lifetime that's B&B with its trashy salaciousness.

I too would prefer a daily serial, but I'm curious to see where this goes.

Totally agree. It's sad that a lot of the P&G soaps such as those two are barely mentioned in pop culture nowadays. ABC soaps seem to have more of a cultural staying power with layman audiences.

  • Members
Posted
I’m practically on my knees praying for this to happen. Please, please, please—just like Sabrina Carpenter says! As I mentioned in the other thread, All My Children is sitting on a goldmine of characters ready for spin-offs, whether as limited series or TV movies. Plus, there’s a whole roster of notable alumni who would probably jump at the chance to come back, especially since it’s a short-term gig!
  • 4 weeks later...
  • Members
Posted

With studios being so wary right now to try anything new, I am not shocked that they are looking into their catalogues for IP to use and landed on using soap characters to anchor some tv films to guarantee that at the least first one has eyes in it.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Vernon is an idiot. Why would he have Sharon in the same hotel that Leslie is staying at?
    • Yes, that out of the blue return was odd. Maybe GG found a forgotten clause in the contract he signed when he was wooed to ABC and they were forced to take him back! Like George Reinholt he talked about the contract that promised him primetime roles. But it was loaded in the networks favor. I think it was Gloria Loring that re-signed at Days on the promise of primetime opportunities, but that was all it was- she was put up for guest spots and TV movies but not necessarily guaranteed that she get the role.
    • I still am baffled by why Monty brought back stunt hire Gerald Gordon in the early '80s out of nowhere for like a year. I haven't found anyone who can come up with a thing he did in that second stint of note.
    • It's interesting to watch this having watched The Doctors. I'm not sure I'm seeing that much of a difference in the characters Gerald Gordon and Anna Stuart played on The Doctors and what they're playing here.
    • I keep forgetting a huge chunk of that year was written by scabs. You're probably right, because by the time the strike was over, they were likely planning an exit for Alan's character as it must have been obvious by then that Bernau was not going to return. If he was still there, it's also doubtful they would have approached MZ and MG about coming back. Wild.
    • And to think the original plan was for David and Lesley to have an affair.  Not only would that have made no sense - Lesley wasn't THAT stupid, lol - but it also would've ruined her and GH.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Week ending March 5 1978 Second season shows are tested CBS finishes first week in March with stronger than usual 1 9.5, but not enough to beat ABC The prime -time ratings pattern continued to hold steady for the week ended March 5, and attention increasingly turns to second season entries as the networks probe one another's weaknesses or cover their own. As usual, ABC -TV won the week, scoring a 20.5 average rating. But CBS -TV was closer than usual with a 19.5 average garnered with the help of several strong specials and movies in addition to some of its dependable series regulars. NBC followed its habit of plummeting when its "évent "entries failed. In this case it was the miniseries, Loose Change, which scored only 24 and 22 shares on Monday and Tuesday, leaving the network with a 16.9 average rating for the week. Looking at new series and new time slots, ABC's Six Million Dollar Man on Monday (8 -9 p.m. NYT) continued to falter with a 22 share, while What's Happening, in its new slot on Saturday (8 -9 p.m.), also remained shaky with a 23 share. Starsky and Hutch is still healthy with a 38 share in its new slot following Charlie's Angels on Wednesday, and How the West Was Won also had a 38 on Sunday (8 -9 p.m.). Against West CBS's Rhoda and On Our Own came in poorly for the second week in a row of face to face competition, with each pulling 25 shares after a 41 share lead in from 60 Minutes. ABC's special two -hour presentation of the upcoming series tryout, Having Babies, scored a 27 share on Friday (9 -11 p.m.) against strong competition from both the other networks (the movie "Ski Lift to Death" on CBS and Rockford Files and Quincy on NBC). For CBS, its new Monday night leadoffs, Good Times and Baby I'm Back, scored so -so 27 and 28 shares respectively. But the second half of the night had its best performance since the new line -up came in- M *A*S *Hwith a 45, One Day at a Time with a 41 and Lou Grant with a 36. Celebrity Challenge of the Sexes and Shields and Yarnell showed no signs of reviving on Tuesday, with 16 shares each, but the new Tuesday movie slot held up with a 41 share from Clint Eastwood's "Magnum Force." The network's entire Saturday line up continued to limp in, as Bob Newhart Tony Randall, The Jeffersons, Maude and Kojak all scored sub 30 shares (with the exception of Newhart's 29, in fact, all scored sub -25 shares). NBC premiered its new Chuck Barris Rah Rah Show on Tuesday (8 -9 p.m.),when it pulled a 24 share. The second episode of Quark had a 27, three points down from its premiere. There might be the temptation to conclude that the 29 share turned in by the National Love, Sex and Marriage Test on Sunday (9:30 -10 p.m.) proves the appetite for "sophisticated" subject matter is not insatiable after all, except that its competition was not only CBS's strong comedy block but also ABC's rerun of "The Way We Were," which pulled a 35 share. Of NBC's other midseason entries -CPO Sharkey, Black Sheep Squadron, James at 16 and Class of '65 -CPO Sharkey turned in the highest score of the week, a 27.   *NBC were in dire straits at this point relying on movies and specials which could hit or bomb in equal measure.  Fred Silverman had his work cut out for him when he arrived that Summer. He favored sitcoms and series as the schedule's foundation and NBC had no sitcoms to build on and few solid series. He also had a big backlog of specials/mini series that had been committed to air. Also NBC had a long standing relationship with Universal so he was forced to work with that studio. He struggled to get quality producers on board as they were either tied into deals with ABC/CBS or were wary of having their shows on the 3rd rated network. He still felt variety had a place on the schedule however and that lead to duds like Susan Anton, The Big Show and Pink Lady and Jeff.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • I spent years hoping we would get an oral history like the OLTL book, but it’s too late now with so many having passed away.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy