Jump to content

BTG: History, Behind the Scenes Articles & Photos


Errol

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

I'm not sure what you're getting at. In April 1999 when Susan D. Lee dealt with the NBC soaps, despite the fact that AW had the better ratings, she canceled AW & made a deal with Spelling. Sunset Beach got a 6 month extension, till the end of the year & not a day longer. They knew on April 12, 1999 that they were off the air as of Dec. 31, 1999, so months & months ahead of time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wouldn't imagine there's much of anything to publicize at this point, other than what they've already announced:  Michele Val Jean is creating a soap to premiere in early 2025.  I doubt there's an "official" title yet, no cast, very few production slots filled, only a "tentative" bible and perhaps some rough drafts of the first few scripts.

A lot of y'all are likely too young to remember Y&R's "publicity campaign" in 1973.  A couple of months before the show began, CBS let us know that Where the Heart Is would be biting the dust "sometime in the spring" and would be replaced by Bill Bell's new show The Innocent Years, to be produced by John Conboy. 

A week or so before the show premiered, we were advised the title of Bell's show had been changed to Young and Restless Years.  It was (vaguely) described as being about "man-woman chemistry in a fictional Midwestern city."  We were treated to the names of some of the central characters, one of whom (Russell Henderson) never even made it to the air.  

A few days before the premiere, we got a cast list, and the girl playing Leslie Brooks in the cast list didn't play Leslie Brooks on the show.  Someone else did. 

All of that to say -- as they tell writers -- "never get married to your first draft". 

The first draft of "The Gates" (as well as the title of the show itself) will probably change 15 times between now and January.  (In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if the "rich family living in the posh, gated community", who we're currently led to believe are the central characters, become minor, sidelined in-laws by the time the final drafts are submitted.  Stranger things have happened, lol.)  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Didn't One Life to Live premiere with all these billowing flames in its opening titles, presumably to reflect the name of the series -- Between Heaven & Hell, which of course ultimately wasn't the show's title at all?  lol.  

At any rate, these types of shows are a "moving target" until they're put on tape, and even then, drastic changes can occur before they hit the air.  Too much publicity too quickly (especially in these days of social media) can only serve to make Michele look like a lame-brain when something heavily publicized never materializes on-screen.  Or even worse, the fear of looking like a lame-brain might cause her to retain a title, a character, a location, or a premise that she fundamentally KNOWS she should ditch once the scripts are being taped.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I still don't think it would've hurt to receive a "small snack" of The Gates, so to speak, preferably during the Daytime Emmys. As it was pointed out, save the casting info for later, but a small continued acknowledgement of the show would've been nice.

Edited by vanguard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Add how fast the news cycle moves anyway - the only thing a "snack" would've provided is probably confusion, because as @Broderick points out a lot of things will probably change between now and the premiere in January. More things will fall into place once they get to filming and even then I'm sure they'll keep fine-tuning.

But there's really no point to even start any campaign until October-ish and even then it's just better to do small teases and then increase those as filming progresses and it starts falling into place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sometimes a discussion can become a bit too “Inside Baseball”. From what I remember, the trade papers were really the only place where you could find any information about a series this far out from production. And let’s be real…Jane Q. Public doesn’t care about the trade papers. We might, but the rest of the public could care not less.
In a previous post, I wrote that promotion before Labor Day is likely to be forgotten and lost in the shuffle—unless you are putting promo in a movie theater ahead of the latest Hollywood summer blockbuster, which is unlikely to happen with a daytime soap-they’ll never have the budget for this. Even if TV Guide were still relevant, I’d still say wait until autumn to start doling out promos, at the earliest. From reports in The Hollywood Reporter, network television is not only losing out to Netflix, both are losing attention due to YouTube and TikTok right now and during the summer, people are likely watch the least amount of network television (do people still watch Big Brother?).

 

Also, I would rather the production focus on story projections, scripts, sets and ultimately, casting. Everything else is probably a distraction until most of those things are in place.

Edited by DramatistDreamer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I will saw that back in the 1960s, the concept of Dark Shadows took over a year between his pitch and the first episode coming together.   So I imagine that she's working behind the scene on determining what from the bible to present.. and also probably determining sets, interviewing production people, and weeding through sample scripts that are being given to her (since a lot of times you have either a try out with a few scripts, or have to submit a script you've written based on an outline given).

I saw if if it's November 2024 and we've heard nothing such as a tentative cast list, or even an exact date the show is set to debut.. then maybe be concerned a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I feel like the latest they could go into filming would be October due to the holiday breaks in November and December. That's if they're sticking with a January debut. News should start coming out late-August/September as we get closer to October. I'd hope they don't rush the filming part of it. It's not uncommon to miss with certain bits of casting so it would be nice to give themselves some space in case someone needs to be replaced, or if they see something isn't working on screen and they want to scrape it before it airs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • @TaoboiI ran into Dani’s favorite party planner again tonight

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy