Jump to content

General Hospital: May 2023 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 749
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

I just thought Wu wanted the garage as a strategic space for her mob family's operations. She is absolutely a mob boss, I think from the same family as the one from the original Asian Quarter story in the '80s. She first appeared (again, IIRC) as a dayplayer in one of RC's cartoonish "I'll do the mob, but they'll all be like villains from Daredevil" scenes in 2014 or 2015. Then people liked her cutting eyes and wanted her to have more to do, and here we are with Selina Wu giving the same read on every single scene.

I think we're supposed to think this garage is worth that much. Which is insane to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Isn't Selina the head of one of the legendary 5 families Sonny always talks about?   I thought Selina wanted to just do something illegal out of the garage nothing more than that.  

For Sasha's conservatorship I do think we are supposed to think the garage plus her Deception earnings make her rich.  I can't imagine a random newbie model for a company like Deception makes much though.  It's just a buzzy plot point because there is no way Sasha would need a conservator in real life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it's another attempt to do something vaguely 'ripped from the headlines' tbh. I've noticed this recently with GH. They did a Kesha/Dr.Luke-esque music scandal storyline with Brook Lynn, Chase and his singing partner vs. that scummy record producer, and now there's this conservatorship with Sasha a la Britney Spears. But in both cases you have potentially dynamite IRL-to-soap material either hung on very bland characters or told in the least interesting, least dynamic or aggressive way possible.

Of course, the kind of social issue storytelling they won't go near is the stuff they should do most of all: Stuff like the pandemic, or treating LGBT people, or abortion rights.

Yep. Her first appearances were at those meetings.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's funny because it is supposed to be a topical story, but GH did no research into it at all to portray anything accurately.  Having two boring C-list characters doesn't help nor does the fact that Sasha's been fine for months now.   This story has been lingering on at a snail's pace for what feels like years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You know how sometimes soap opera characters lie for no good reason?

It feels like Nina's compulsion to tell Sonny the truth is equally unmotivated.  Except for the fact that it is a soap, there is no way that Sonny would have found out the truth.  It's not like the SEC is going to tell Sonny.  She's not going to have to testify, because her evidence is purely hearsay.  And the only other person that knows is Ava.

So, why would she ever tell the truth when there are zero consequences to keeping it a secret?

Equally, why do Carly and Drew think that knowing who told the SEC will clear their names?  While there is some reasonable doubt about their intention to engage in insider trading, they obviously tried to cover it up, and Ned can testify to that fact.  As Martha Stewart will tell you, it is often the cover-up and not the crime that gets you in trouble (she was convicted of obstruction, not insider trading).  So, why focus on who reported them rather than establishing a reasonable defense?  It's not as if a court would care that Nina only called the SEC because she hates Carly, one assumes that is how they get most of their anonymous tips. 

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Drew Cain ( I mean Ryan Lavery) & Carly Spencer are gonna use Tracy Angelica Quartermaine to get Ned to Recant to the SEC. First, he didnt inform the SEC . Tracy will eat them alive. Finally, The SEC will not care. Carly & Drew did break the law. Team Ned Team Tracy

Edited by John
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It is.  You've watched Sonny these last 30 years, right? Lol!  Every relationship Sonny's ever had with a woman requires a hard double standard.   He's protecting these ladies for their own good, but they are not allowed to lie.  Nina is kind of an idiot because she probably thinks he's different with her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Unless GH writers didn't bother to Google conservatorships AND obstruction, it feels like they've written themselves into a corner.

Around Thanksgiving, Ned had a conversation with Drew that his relationship with Carly would appear as if they were engaging in insider trading.  Then, Drew and Carly decided to hide their relationship in order to avoid the appearance of wrongdoing.  Multiple people know that they continued to engage in an intimate relationship while lying about it.  If all of those people testified, the SEC would be able to convict them both of obstructing justice. 

As an audience, we saw all of that happen, so it would be difficult to suddenly write themselves out of this conflict, regardless of blackmail or lover's quarrels.  Also, I fail to see how ELQ would be liable for any of this, given that Ned told them not to do it.

Going back to Martha, all she did was tell a friend that it was good to know people with information, then she erased that phone call from her diary, resulting in her conviction and a sentence of five months in prison.

We'll know that GH writers have no access to Google if Drew shows up in Pentonville with Cyrus rather than at a federal penitentiary. 

 

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't understand why Ned is all in a huff about people believing he's the one who turned in Drew and Carly.  If I were Ned, I'd be more like, "Well, whether I turned them in or I didn't, Drew and Carly were idiots to think they could get away with keeping their relationship under wraps, so whatever happens to them, they had it coming!  Now, what's for lunch?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • And now all the episodes are gone. SMH. These jackasses never stop 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Not much happened today. But @brisbydog, all of our wish came true: no Leo this week

      Please register in order to view this content

      I guess Susan was necessary today, but I really wish she’d leave. Marlena putting EJ on blast about Belle was pretty good though, and I hope they continue to use Marlena in their storyline. I’m interested in seeing what happens to EJelle in the aftermath of the John storyline. And I really wish we were seeing Paul and Andrew moving in on John’s location. If they can’t get Christopher Sean on the show, they should at least try to get Colton Little.  I liked how smart Xander was today and that he immediately that Philip stole the drug. He did a pretty good job in his scenes where he confronted Philip as well. I also appreciate the way that Philip’s been written lately; more like a tragic hero than a bratty, goofy clown. Which is all the more reason that I hope the triangle with Stephanie and Alex is revived. But Xander did seem a little overly melodramatic in his last scene though And, I can’t help but think that Dr. Russell being so hesitant about involving the police in the drug theft could be a sign of something. 
    • I haven’t watched since Daisy’s last episode. Part of me feels like its a good place to end it because outside of The Platt’s, Tracy, Todd, and Carla and Swain I haven’t really enjoyed the show. Too many depressing stories and irksome characters, I especially hate what they’re doing to Debbie. I do think its funny they spent all this time investing into that awful new family and apparently they’ve already been canned, feedback must have been horrid.
    • I think the pre-Barnabas episodes are very underrated both for dialogue and character. They're slow but they really create a world and fill out the characters, imbuing them with heavy dimension that ultimately will have to sustain them for years as the show largely stops writing for character after it returns from 1795. What we know about them by then is what they have to power them. (I don't think the show was bad after, I actually love it in '68 and often in times after that, but it was very different.) I think the B&W episodes with Barnabas' early days are especially frightening - they terrified me as a kid - but the color stuff in '67 is also very strong, especially in the stretch where Julia is on the run, Carolyn is under Barnabas' control, and you get the sense that events have gone off the rails for the regular characters and anything goes. As a child viewer seeing it in syndication on the Sci-Fi Channel, who had no idea who lived or who died, it was a lot. Mitch Ryan is especially powerful in the early pre-Barnabas era as the sort of Byronic Burke Devlin character. You knew they had to kill him once Barnabas comes in, despite Ryan's alcohol problem making it impossible to keep him at the show - Burke dominates the first year or so as the fulcrum character, he's incredibly magnetic and charismatic. You couldn't see him becoming a dupe for Barnabas and Julia, as Anthony George's more benign, mild version briefly does before getting unceremoniously killed off. I always found Burke's offscreen plane crash death very eerie and suspicious, and I think the show does toy with the question if Barnabas' powers somehow got him on that plane and if he took it down. I had always wanted Burke to return one day, in any revival project, as a kind of vengeful power broker and puppet master, driven by Vicki's inevitable demise to get revenge on Barnabas and co. I still have Art Wallace's "Shadows on the Wall" DS bible somewhere. IIRC in the earliest versions of the plot Vicki was going to somehow be tied to the butler or his daughter - Betty Hanscomb or something. I don't remember the exact details. I do know there's all sorts of raised and dropped plotlines and characters offscreen in '66, like Ned Calder, the man they clearly intended to pair with Liz and so on. I've always found '66 very rich, but I don't begrudge the show after for it because it's still awfully well-written, specifically the early Barnabas stuff.
    • I totally agree with this, as most of you seem to. Mary Carney was at least competent and reasonably likable; I just feel like she barely had anything of substance to do before she was abruptly given the hook. And I get the backstory of Kathleen Tolan having done a play with Helen Gallagher, but...at any point did they ever actually READ her before they greenlit her? Because...OOF. First time I saw her on SoapNet was right when this GODAWFUL actress named Charity Rahmer played Belle on Days of Our Lives for all of three weeks before she was mercifully recast; her line readings were straight out of a Charlie Brown special. I remember thinking Kathleen Tolan could have played her mother! In the Frank/Jill/Delia triangle, Delia WAS the one who was cheated on, so I got why she was upset and thought it was perfectly valid in theory at least, but of course it was blown up to Wagnerian proportions including falls involving staircases and tricycles. But with Pat/Faith/Delia I had no sympathy for her...especially because it was mainly with Catherine Hicks's Faith and I really liked her.
    • I was going through those episodes from 1984 and early 1985 before they were taken down. Some of the older characters, like Don and even Tom, looked a little out of place, like they were on the wrong show. But the newer characters were fun. It's too bad they lost the character of Melissa. I guess Jennifer took her long-term place on the canvas. 
    • How I will remember him...

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • The black and white episodes of the show are very special. An atmosphere the color run loses. Dark Shadows was filmed live-on-tape. They could do a retake but it would be very expensive. I think there was a claim that if actors wanted a retake they would curse. There was also a rumor that at one point Joan Bennett accidentally said "Hollywood" instead of "Collinwood" and that necessitated a retake.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      Angela Lansbury stars as Jessica Fletcher in one of the longest-running and most beloved TV series of all-time, Murder, She Wrote. Set in Cabot Cove, Maine, Jessica is a mystery writer and amateur detective who is quick to outwit both criminals and the police when it comes to solving a murder. Winner of 4 Golden Globes and nominated for 12 consecutive Primetime Emmy Awards for Best Actress in a Drama, the series showcases unforgettable guest stars including Tom Bosely, George Clooney, Shirley Jones, Courteney Cox, Leslie Nielsen, Mickey Rooney, Tom Selleck, John Amos, Dorothy Lamour, Cyd Charrise and many more. In Murder, She Wrote: The Complete Series, help Jessica get to the bottom of every crime she encounters in this completely remastered collection featuring all 264 episodes, 4 TV movies, and bonus features. Special Features: "Novel Connection" (Crossover Episode of Magnum P.I.); The Great 80's TV Flashback; Origin of a Series; Recipe for a Hit; America's Top Sleuths; The Perils of Success
    • Loved this IG post from Ambyr about how she and Trisha work together. You can tell these ladies go above and beyond the script, and that they really trust and enjoy working together. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DJpJufFPOQ2/?igsh=MXBmcWs0YzIwaXVhNA==  

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy