Jump to content

Ken Corday interview on the move to Peacock.


Recommended Posts

  • Members

SOD: "Well, The Big news is that days is moving to the streaming service Peacock, Tell us everything!
Corday: It's very excting, this was baked into the last contract when we were renewed in 2021, The network always had the right to migrate the show exclusively to peacock and now they decided to do so and we're excited. The bottom line is, this is the future. Whether people believe it now or in a year or two, this is the future of first run dramatic television. Let's just hope the migration is wonderful and our loyal viewers stick with us and subscribe.

SOD: Are you concerned that people might be reluctant to watch on a different platform?
Corday: "Well, We have to find a way to make this very easy and palpable for our viewers, be it young or old, to kno ow it works, not only by subscription  but how it actually works at home on your phone and with your TV. So we'll be be doing some promos and PSAs for that. We'll have Bill Hayes and Susan Seaforth Hayes showing eachother how to access Peacock. 

SOD: What about people worried the show won't be the same?
Corday: "For starters, it's the same show You will probably be getting more show content after February of next year. Because we don't have to limit the show to 38 minutes with 22 minutes of commercial time and with the higher subscription you get no commercials So that's good, Also the brodcast quality on streaming is better than network brodcast.

SOD: What is your overal message to the viewers.
Corday: It's 2022 and the future is here. There are three certain things about life. The most precious thing about life is time. so this is happening quickly and we have to make the most of it. The most constant thing in life is change. We have to accept it and roll with it. And the most inportant thing in life is happiness. We have to make NBC happy and the viewers happy. There's trepidation because this is a big change, but it's going to be the same Days you know and love and it will be better in small ways. First longer program length come spring we will be able to say and do things that are a little bit more titliating than on brodcast it's still Days but it's not your mothers days. it changes, it's growing but in all the best ways. The network has been extremly postive and happy and are allaying any qualms I may have.

SOD: What do you say to the people who are saying Days will be cancelled?
Corday: "Yeah, it's funny how the bottom feeders grabbed the news and said "Days will be cancelled, next." It never ceases to amaze me ho, you know "If it bleeds it leads," And let's say the worst things we can say about it. This is not the end of an era, it's the beginning of another. "
 

Edited by Dylan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Six months

He actually thinks viewers are going to wait that long?

Corday doesn't really care that his parents soap got cancelled and will no longer be on tv.

He knew this could happen but never made changes to prevent it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This made me laugh.  The idea of teaching a 98 year old man how to watch TV suggests that marketing has not really done their research on what are the perceived barriers to using a streaming service.  I mean read the other threads, it seems like value for dollar is a more likely impediment than a lack of understanding of technology.

On the other hand, I think these are his strongest arguments.  If you ignore the writing, acting, lighting, sets, and production values, at least the picture will be clearer and there will be more of it to watch.

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, sheesh. This has nothing to do with the actors as I love them dearly, but there's just something about this that rubs me the wrong way. It is what it is I suppose, but there's nothing like a good ol' fashioned tutorial to show those feeble-minded Baby Boomers and Traditionalists how to access Peacock.

Then again, maybe it'll be cute. 

Edited by Noel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Back in the day when Corday was in the press trying defend the writing of Langan, Higley, Reilly and Sheffer I use to think the soap press needed hazard pay for the way he would spin everything .

But that was a time when Corday could easily throw various writers and producers under the bus for stuff he actually rubber stamped. I believe at this point Corday is just bidding his time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Canadian TV is a fair bit less puritanical than the US. The CBC has long maintained a far more liberal attitude towards language and nudity compared to any American channel, and as far as I know, that extends to the other networks to varying degrees as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This show is done.

The way this is being handled, with no fanfare, almost casually, like it's no big deal, tells you all you need to know.

If they wanted this to succeed, they would have at least given the production a head's up so that they could have adjusted the material. Instead it seems like the production found out the same time everyone else did, and as a result, any adjustment is going to happen 6 months from now. That's not going to work. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I guess that confirms what a lot of people thought - that the two year renewal deal had a clause that would allow them to move it to Peacock. Still, you'd think they would have been able to gauge this months ago if they were going to move it and prepare better. Now any change won't be visible until February and any curiosity watchers who might tune in to see if the show has changed will be long gone by then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • And its 2025, not the 1970s, 80s, 90s... just bc pre-emptions have been a thing for decades, doesn't mean there shouldnt already be ways to deal with it in the modern era. Airing th episodes in the markets that can and putting them up and directing viewers to CBS.com to see them for free and of course Paramount Plus for those subscribers, seems like a reasonable compromise. Today's tv market leans heavily towards streaming so there is no reason why they shouldnt leverage that when it comes to this
    • Anita Dupree is Ruth Marshall from Generations. Ruth also a past of being a singer who gave it up because of raising a family and having a husband.

      Please register in order to view this content

      Still. THIS ONE!  
    • Some photo collages I've done. 

      Please register in order to view this content

                     This is not mine. 
    • Your right, as opposed to other matriarchs, even Nancy Hughes, Bert had a vital life outside of her family. She wasn't just sitting in her kitchen waiting for someone to stop by and cry. She volunteered, and later (thanks actually to Pam Long) had a job running the Patient Advocacy program, had friends, it didn't seem weird if she was at a party or an event, (with Nancy even with Marland it was like she was tagging along and every felt responsible for including her)  Bert was kind of a role model for aging gracefully and independently. I dont understand why they didnt bring a recast Mike and Hope back when Alan returned.  Your right, his animosity towards Ed and his branch, seemed forced....but not as much as the years of Alan hating on the Lewis family, then even worse, the Coopers..(like they would be a match for Alan..they would be totally beneath his notice.) They should have had Mike in constant oppostion to Alan and Roger (Ed was too docile and had his own problems at home) especially if Alan was involved with Alex.
    • Loving the show these days, one week into the post Ron era and I am feeling the difference. First off, thrilled to see Steve and Kayla together, and with their daughter. Ron never cared about this legacy couple. Shawn asking Steve to help him steal the drug is very much, finally, in character, for Bo's son. Bo would absolutely do the same thing. I am excited about this whole story, and now Xander is clearly in the mix. Will Titan provide the resources to help Kayla synthesize the drug, save Bo, and then take credit?  Leo was not too bad today but he is still obnoxious. Gabi and Philip though... now that has more spark than she has ever had with dull JJ. Here for this! Especially since it seems he gets to keep his stolen Co CEO job (and honestly, he should, Victor would want him at Titan. I think the solution is Xander gets Titan and Philip gets Dimera).  I liked Xander and Alex too, it is good to see them working together after the whole mess up last year with their names. Stephanie's book was an odd thing. Guess Alex will try to get it published with or without her permission. Kind of rude to just walk off with it.
    • I NEED MY SILK PRESS SHEILA FIX!
    • Thanks! I've kept thinking that he carried some negatives.  Patrick Mulcahey told a story about a scene being written where a helicopter swooped down upon a group of people & the P&G rep tried to sell them on the idea of it not being a helicopter, but a blue luxury sedan. Yeah, NOT. 
    • I've never thought about this. I'm curious about what made you think to pose it as a question. I am strong on AW & weak on OLTL.  Linda Dano & Stephen Schnetzer both acted on OLTL first & then were lifetime characters on AW. Both shows had Agnes Nixon.  Irna Phillips had two main proteges: Agnes Nixon & Bill Bell. Irna was part of the creation of 2 soaps that in the 1970s were in grave danger of very early cancellation. Agnes Nixon saved AW & Bill Bell saved DAYS OF OUR LIVES.  After being HW at AW Agnes created OLTL, right? Her first ABC tenure, where before she had been a P&G writer, 1st GL & then AW. (Do I have that chronology correct?) Both AW & OLTL had very high points in terms of ratings, awards, success & also very low points where they struggled. At times OLTL was considered "not as good" as AMC. At times AW was considered "not as good" as DAYS OF OUR LIVES. They share anything & everything that relates to being a New York City soap. I think they share that they didn't get the respect they deserved. Both had their female lead be the strongest character on the show & also that they were the unquestioned star of the show.  When AW's cancellation was announced, Angela Shapiro went to P&G & tried to buy AW to air on ABC. It is not known how she planned to schedule that but one theory was that she would air AW & OLTL both as half hour soaps, back to back, mid to late afternoon. P&G declined & then she tried to buy the character Felicia Gallant. No, again. Then she did what we all know too well & put Linda Dano as Rae on all the ABC soaps. I have dubbed that 'Shapiro's Folly'.  Honestly, I don't think that OLTL suffered from being "Bay City-fied" or AWfication. However, these are some [nitpick] parallels or similarities. Possibly they are of interest. Anyway, I've had fun with it. 
    • Oh, wow. This explains why there is a scene in one of the 1987 episodes where Alan out of the blue brings up Rita to Ed! It always seemed incredibly out of place before now. For most of 1987 Alan was involved with Vanessa. Marland initially planned to have Rita and Vanessa become rivals over Ed. They ultimately decided Ed and Van were not a good pairing. While I was never convinced Van was in love with Alan, she could be very possessive, so the two of them fighting over him could have been very interesting.  If she had come back with a KID, after Maureen accepted Ed's baby with Claire.... SO MANY great possibilities here. Not to mention, if she had come back, MAYBE that would have kept Alan out of Reva's orbit. (I can dream, can't I?) My guess for why they didn't bring her back in 1989--Alan was being hustled off the canvas, plus after bringing back Zaslow and Garrett, they might not have been able to afford her. He complained a lot about Mike's romantic pairings. I seem to remember he also complained that he didn't get to do enough action scenes. I think he wanted to fly a helicopter in a scene and was miffed they had the stunt man do it. Which was probably done because of insurance reasons. In Locher Room interviews I can't recall anyone who worked with him who speaks of him fondly, while people will speak warmly about Chris Bernau and Tom O'Rourke. The best Elvera could do was mention he flirted with her mother during a set visit.
    • After listening to the songs that Michele Val Jean co-wrote for Deniece Williams ... (youtubes and info are a few posts upthread) . . . I wonder MVJ contributed to the music or the lyrics? What type of songs did MVJ's real-life girl group The Articulettes sing?  And what did Anita's fictional Articulettes sing?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy