Jump to content

Days of Our Lives: January 2022 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 502
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

Even if it does happen they didn’t have to make Craig a cheating a.ss hole to be gay.

Even if it does happen they didn’t have to make Craig a cheating a.ss hole to be gay.

Just because it does happen doesn’t mean they had to make Craig a cheating ass for the story just so he can be gay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Agree.  With everything.

 

Again, I agree with everything here.

Yeah, but I wish he were played by someone more dynamic than the guy who used to play Derek Frye.  He always reminds me of Darius Rucker, for some reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's gonna turn into wacky hijinks even if Leo ISN'T involved.  Ron Carlivati doesn't know (anymore) how to write any story without wacky hijinks.  (JER would be so proud, lol.)

I could see Leo with just one guy, in a wacky sort of romance that recalls Eugene and Calliope, but it would take committing to making Leo a more rounded character instead of a plot device in '70's game show host clothing.

I feel as if Tom Langan was attempting to recreate Y&R's Brad and Traci there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Please register in order to view this content

I don't know.   I don't want to offend anyone but I find this story soooo disappointing.  Not because Craig's gay.  That's fine.  But because I really liked what Nancy and Craig represented.  They were were a love story that went beyond looks and it's seems demeaning to end it this way.  Not because of Craig's journey which should be told, but because of what they previously represented.   Listen, they suddenly wouldn't make John or Steve gay.  It feels cheap to make Nancy the patsy on this not knowing her husband was gay for like 75% of her life and also because she is regular size.  Craig can go out and find a foxy man, but Nancy gets left with the wreckage.  It feels a little gross.  I may not be saying this right but it just makes me feel for Nancy and her bad wig lol.  It just feels like of course the heavy girl's hot husband was gay all along.  Half the cast of Days bings all the time as gay/bi/fluid and they make it about this couple.

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think what I object to is the internalized homophobia that requires that there is conflict with regard to Craig coming out.  Nancy and Craig have been together for around 30 years. Why not write a story where a wife is not surprised or betrayed by her husband's sexuality, but perceptive enough to be empathic with his development and supportive of his growth. They are both in their late 50s, there's no reason for this to be drama filled, and there may also be no reason for them to divorce.  The assertion that Nancy had no idea just makes her seem stupid.  This story does not need conflict, nor does it need Craig to be unfaithful to be told, those are old fashioned troupes about being in the closet that do not seem to apply to a modern culture that is more versed in fluidity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah.  that. 

There have been very few populer soap couples where the woman was heavy and the man was hot for her just as she was.
On Days, there was Nancy and Craig. 
On OLTL, there was Marcie Al/Michael.
I'm talking major characters and not occasional recurring background characters.
Nancy and Craig were popular contract characters back in the day.

I know that heavy women viewers appreciated the representation.

Edited by janea4old
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's seems very rude.  Not directing that at you specifically.  I am a slim white women that appreciated that representation.  But of course people will think its fat housewives

Please register in order to view this content

Edited by carolineg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sorry, I should have clarified. I was speaking for myself, as a heavy woman viewer.

And yes I agree that any viewer can appreciate seeing representation, even if the viewer is not a member of the group being represented.  As a viewer, I appreciate seeing a wide variety of humanity being represented on the shows I watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

No worries.  I just thought you were saying everyone that liked Nancy and Craig were regular women having fantasies.   And true to life my husband of 15 years is on the bigger size and sometimes people ask me why I am with him, so that's a little triggering for me.  Looks aren't everything...but that wig still needs an intervention  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I never understood Craig and Nancy's relationship from the very beginning. At first, I remember the actors had a "MEATY" storyline with Craig wanting to be Chief of Staff or whatever, but later on, the two only served as Chloe's backup choir. Craig coming out as bisexual or gay is believable I suppose, but the thing is that I don't care. Craig is not a main character on the show and we're not really "invited" as the character explores who he is or what he's struggling with on an emotional level. We're not invited to this "journey" if that makes any sense. And yet, at the same token I'm relieved not to see it as the storylines last as long as a New York minute that's it's difficult to keep track. Then again, is it? Because all I see is cheating, kidnapping, and wearing a face mask. 

Can't think of the name of Lani's bio dad or how long the character will be on the show, but I sense that it will be short-lived and I'm predicting murder. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't mind the idea of making Craig gay, but I hate what they've turned Nancy into. This isn't Nancy IMO. You can't convince me that if she wasn't played by a traditional sized soap actress that she wouldn't still have her red hair. That grey wig may not be the end of the world to some, but the fact that this character has lost all of her spark, is dressed like an old lady AND she's losing her husband? It feels like such a slap in the face and it's insulting. I wish the story were positioned in a way where Nancy could still be the fun character she was and potentially find love (not to mention revenge on whoever Craig is dating). Instead, it feels like this was done only because the actor who plays Craig is gay and Ron wants to showcase him and have a gay storyline. Of course it's not over and they may do right by Nancy in the end, but so far I am very disappointed.

On a more positive note, I think Johnny works much better possessed than Marlena did. Of course it was fun to revisit the story with her, but with Johnny it's more interesting because it's less expected. I'm enjoying him wrecking havoc around town and I like that everybody isn't being dumbed down for it to make sense. With him EJ's son it isn't outrageous to think he'd act similar to his father. This could have real legs if Ron restrains himself and doesn't overdo it.

Edited by Chris B
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's my concern as well, @carolineg

Now, look: I, for one, never bought Craig and Nancy as this blissfully happy duo.  To me, it made more sense that Craig was a schemer who married Nancy for the money, and that Nancy knew it but didn't care, because she was just happy to be married to such a great-looking guy.  I'll cop to being biased in that respect. 

But to suggest that Craig has been gay or bisexual all along?  And that Nancy never knew until now?  There's garden-variety infidelity; there's knowing all along that you've hooked up with someone who's out of your league, but you don't care, because it beats being alone; and then there's realizing your spouse has basically lied to you for your entire marriage.  The latter is what's going on here; and in the process, it makes Nancy look stupid, and it makes Craig look like the biggest [!@#$%^&*] who ever walked the planet. 

And I'm sure Ron Carlivati will suggest that it was always obvious that Craig was sexually attracted to other men and that Nancy kept her head in the sand about it.  But that won't wash, Ron.  Craig and Nancy were never written with that subtext in mind, and their fans (of which there are many!) will never believe it.

 

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I mean, obviously, it's not the norm for a couple to have that disparity in looks/physique/whatever on a soap.  Not that I don't think PD isn't attractive or anything, but KS is a very good looking guy.  But I got onboard with Craig loves Nancy and everything about her because that what was shown onscreen.   I could maybe buy Nancy keeping her head in the sand about this because she was so happy she had a hot husband, but that's not Nancy.  She was confident, secure, funny, intelligent and never cared about what people said.  These are fictional characters but to make Nancy's whole romantic life a lie really sucks for her. That's devastating. Whether Craig is gay or bi or whatever he owed his life partner (who I assume he does love) the respect of telling her he was confused or attracted to men because he obviously didn't wake up at 55 one day to being gay.  I have no problem with this particular story being told but it really does [!@#$%^&*] on 2 characters that were fine as is.  This feels like a story for shock value more than an organic story and I don't think we are going to get much of Nancy's POV.

Could you imagine being 55, 60 whatever age Nancy is supposed to be and starting over in the romance department?  That would be an interesting story, but we know the story is going to be Craigs wacky hijinks with Leo or some [!@#$%^&*] 

Edited by carolineg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I've enjoyed Vernon but I wouldn't be opposed to learning more about his life beyond his political work. What kind of family does he come from? Does he have any siblings? I feel like that could be an interesting thing to look at.
    • GH:       A- DAYS:   A- BTG:     B- B&B:     F Y&R:     F
    • I've always said, Robert Newman does not get enough credit for the popularity of Josh/Reva. Had he stayed in '91, and had years to build other relationships before Kim returned, I'm not sure we'd have been stuck with "always".
    • Bizarrely, while I didn't see it, I distinctly remember my younger sister telling me. We were walking to the store, and at the top of the hill she let out "Roger raped Holly", and I swear I remember it echoing for what seemed like forever. She would've been five at the time.  I know,,,which I find extraordinary. I have toyed with the idea of watching Another World for Maeve, Kathleen Widdoes and Beverlee. But watching Vanessa call Emma Snyder "momma" kinda weirded me out. LOL. I believe that's what I read in the recaps from the time as well. I meant, I couldn't quite believe that the audience wouldn't understand that a woman preparing to go to her engagement party  was raped. I know that on ATWT John raped Kim while they were married, resulting in Andy, but I think they shied away from calling that marital rape.
    • I have my fingers crossed for a baby to be named Monica Michelle & called Monica. And, yes, I do realize that is not equal to having her onscreen but, like you said & of course a recast is unthinkable. 
    • I would love to have Monica on screen. Leslie Charleson has died. She played the role for 46 years. Monica should pass as well. No one is going to accept a long-term recast for Monica, no matter how great  the actress they could get.
    • Coming into June...   It just occurred to me that seeing Carter/Hope engaged that there was something missing. Oh, yeah! DAPHNE. I missed a few episodes, but she left, right? So is Ridge going to be the spoiler for Carter/Hope now? I felt that Daphne/Carter/Hope had more legs to it. But I guess we will see.   I did enjoy that show circling back around to Luna/Will/Electra. Katie was spitting nothing, but truth. Same for Sheila. And it's good to see Luna vs Electra, and they gave off more adversary chemistry this time around versus when they were at Deacon's.    I was happy to see Liam reduced to C plot.
    • To bring over from the May Sweeps Thread from @Chris B   I know the fashions have gotten mixed reviews but I actually like what the new costume designer is putting the cast in. It feels more modern and the more tacky pieces I feel make sense for rich people. They're buying for the brand and the price and we often see celebs in things like this. Especially for a character like Nikki, I feel the more over the top (and tacky), the more realistic it is.   I agree. While it has been hit and miss no question, I have found it fascinating to watch what the costume designer is attempting to do with the various characters and their clothes. Some have been overdue. Some have been fascinating. But (outside of Billy) not boring to watch. I definitely find it more modern as well.   My growing issue has been it's not good that the best reason to watch Y&R as of late has been to see what people are wearing rather than the writing. It feels like a red flag.
    • Haha. The fact that I stopped regularly viewing at the same time and know what you are talking about is chef's kiss.    I'm slowly bingewatching Nurse's Ball Week. But it's slow for me because a lot of the same tics and writing flaws for me that made me throw up my hands is still evident *cough*CVE*cough* Thankfully, there are some things I like also and from a glance in the GH May Thread, it seem like it had a good Sweeps with good fallout. And do I even need to mention Nina finally slapping the taste out of Carly's mouth? See? Regardless of her flaws, I do enjoy Korte-headed episodes over CVE-headed episodes because they always seem to have more emotional resonance to long-time fans.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy