Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members
Posted

 

High. I don't want to base my feeling on something as superficial as hair, but his neck beard reminds me of some of the January 6th Capitol Hill peeps, and his shaved back and sides is giving me white supremacist vibes.

 

Once again, some guy in a rage grabs his gun (which substitutes for his d*ck) and decides to gun down a minority group which is also female. And workers at a massage parlor, on top of that. Like, are they really a threat to his way of life? He picked weak links. The rise in anti-Asian sentiment and all that 'China virus' BS from DT spearheaded this. Never mind that 4 of the dead have been confirmed as South Korean nationals. 

 

Also the killer is apparently on suicide watch, but he still got the cops to go get him some Burger King. So he wasn't too suicidal to eat. Can you imagine if someone of another color instructed the cops to go to Dairy Queen to get him a shake?

 

I hear that the killer was active in his local church. I'm not saying he wasn't radicalized online, but given that churches are now power players in their own right who can urge their flock to vote a certain way -- and have done since the late 70s -- can we just agree to investigate these places to see just what kind of hate talk and stirring up these places are doing? And once and for all, can we stop subsidising 'places of worship' and start taxing them? All places of worship -- churches, temples, synagogues, Scientologist audit centres etc. etc. There are people out there hiding behind 'religion,' collecting far too much money and power from the gullible and God-fearin'. I say this as a lapsed Catholic and 'believer' of sorts. 

  • Members
Posted (edited)

It's horrific. We know all about this poor little church-goin' manchild who had a bad day, but still nothing on the victims, not their ages, not who they were, nothing. Just some faceless, dehumanized women. Plus one male. What kind of day do you think they were having?

Edited by Cat
  • Members
Posted

Sex addiction? Really? Michael Fassbender's character in the movie SHAME reacted more realistically to his sex addiction than his 'addict.' Clearly, that is as much a lie as he was on suicide watch, but the police went and got him Burger King? Burger King? On suicide watch? ???

 

@ChitHappens no video yet, but I'm sure it will surface.

Please register in order to view this content

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • After the slap it does feel inevitable - being arrested and thrown out right after her big win.
    • Yesterday it was Theo and Jada.  Today it's Chad and Belle.  What a mess.  
    • I asked my soap historian GPT to help pull together the best available sources on Daniel Pilon’s run, and here’s what the research confirms: * Pilon played Max Dubujak on *Ryan’s Hope* from 1983–88. * He began appearing as Alan Spaulding on *Guiding Light* in 1988. * An academic source notes that he appeared as **Max and Alan simultaneously in November 1988 * His later-life interviews mention major upheavals, including losing his home in the Northridge earthquake and declaring bankruptcy in 1994.  That’s the factual foundation. Now for the human side of it. I’ll admit Pilon was never my favorite Alan. The Spauldings are supposed to have that patrician, Midwestern money vibe, and suddenly here comes this very European-sounding gentleman sweeping into Springfield like he wandered in from a different soap entirely. It created a strange tonal shift, at least in my memory. Whether he was intended to be temporary is hard to pin down, but honestly, looking at what he was dealing with in his real life, I don’t know that the show ever had a truly stable window to figure it out. He was going through marital strife, while being talked about as the "next James Bond" back in Canada, and juggling work on two soaps at once is a lot. Under those circumstances, the question of whether he was the “right” type for Alan becomes almost secondary to the fact that he was working through multiple emergencies while stepping into one of GL’s biggest roles. So for me, the story of his Alan isn’t just about casting fit. It’s about an actor navigating chaos, the show adapting on the fly, and Springfield getting a very unexpected version of one of its cornerstone characters.  
    • I wish Nicole had swallowed but it is what it is lol 
    • You're probably right, but it's such a mistake to have Dani return to Bill. I do not want that. I like Bill, but that's probably because he's so much better than his garbage wife. Having Dani take back the guy who NEVER stopped cheating on her during their marriage would be a terrible mistake.  Yes, it's a mistake I can see Dani making. That doesn't mean I want to see it.
    • That's funny, I totally didn't think about the possibility that they'll pin this on someone else.  I assumed they'd just roll him into the water.  Obviously, I would not make an ideal hitman. I hope it's not Laura.
    • Andre/Dani, be still my heart 

      Please register in order to view this content

        I knew their booty call hook ups then being friends with benefits were so going to turn into love 
    • Yes it does!! And neglect! They let it drop so long and so often it doesn’t really have much meaning beyond another recurring character killed off. I kind of agree. I don’t want Emma to be SA’d, but he was a creepy professor perv at first, and we could have higher stakes if they let him be a scumbag for longer. Even to add more suspects, like Gio punched his lights out for grabbing Emma innapropriately. Or even better, she punches him, then Gio does too. He had the potential to be fun for a bit longer. I always love it when they do a shooting in the snow on this show lol.
    • Please register in order to view this content

      I went back to see how teen Sami even figured out how to sell a baby in 1993, and the recap is unintentionally hilarious. The exposition is so blunt it feels like the writers drafted it between bites of lunch. Suddenly there’s a teen mom named Karen who sold her baby through a shady lawyer, and somehow Sami just… knows this man and pays him with hospital volunteer money. You can tell they were trying to make the whole thing “plausible” enough, but also knew the baby wouldn’t be gone long enough to justify a real subplot.  I know one thing, if Karen had confided in Jamie, Sami would've never met Steve Miller. Jamie knew that snitches get stitches. Not to be confused with the horrific Stephen Miller, who was 8 in 1993. AND Just to show the audience how shady Steve the lawyer could be, he was played by this guy -- Character actor Terry Wills was cast as creeps on every sitcom in the 1980s.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy