Jump to content

Y&R-Mal Young Out, Josh Griffith Taking Over


Recommended Posts

  • Members

 

In the 1970s, I enrolled in a television writing course in university. I created and wrote a bible for my own soap opera, including the first five scripts. I put a lot of blood, sweat and tears into it. I eventually had it evaluated by three different professors, all of whom were kind enough to give me detailed and extensive praise about it. I was thrilled to receive marks of 96% and 95% (twice), and long remarks/notes/suggestions/constructive criticisms on my writing. The entire student body of one of my classes was given my first script to read, and that went over well too. I was ecstatic and humbled when various classmates said, "I can't wait to see what happens next!" I was in heaven!

 

On the other hand, some other people snarked, "Why waste your time on writing a soap opera? They are stupid, written for lethargic housewives who don't want to get out of their bathrobes. And the writing on them is trash!"

 

Pffft.

 

These anti-soap critics obviously knew nothing of the medium. At the time, we had Harding Lemay on AW, Agnes Nixon on AMC, Bill Bell and Pat Falken Smith on DAYS, Henry Slesar on TEON...daytime dramas were at their peak in terms of quality writing!

 

The criticism of today's soaps is justified. No writer working at any modern soap is talented enough to do the job well. But in the 1950s-80s, when the masters were at play, we had marvelous material to watch.

 

Really, ATWT was the only soap you wanted to write?

 

As they started to fall apart under incompetent writers and producers, I longed to take over the reigns of MANY soaps. I would make notes on how I would repair the damage done by the hacks, and continue on with (hopefully) better plots, characters and themes.

 

ATWT, TGL, DAYS, OLTL, etc., were all on my radar.

 

When Somerset got axed in 1976, I was so annoyed by its missed opportunities and bungled storylines, I projected a year's worth of material for 1977 (I thought, "It could continue in syndication!" LOL!) and (I think) 10 scripts for January of that year. I think many of us dedicated soap lovers have had similar ideas. I ended up writing original stories and editing other writers' material at a publishing house, but never made it into soaps, alas.

 

My bloated ego assures me I would have been FABULOUS! ROTFLMAO!

Please register in order to view this content

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 150
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

 

Traditionally, soap fans have resisted hordes of newbies descending upon the shows and suddenly eating up huge sections of air time.

 

When Katherine Chancellor first appeared on Y&R, I was so invested in the characters I already knew and loved (the Brooks and the Foster families), that I was impatient when I had to sit through scenes of this stranger. I wanted her parts of the episodes to "hurry up and finish" so that could get back to watching Chris and Snapper, Brad and Leslie, etc. 

 

Bill Bell, being the savvy soap god that he was, knew better than to inundate us with Mrs. C five days a week right from the start. He introduced her slowly and sparingly at first, so we didn't instantly resent her and develop negative feelings about how she was taking over the show. By the time Katherine became a lead, we had been allowed to get to know her and become interested in her, and we WANTED to see a lot of her. That's the way to do it. Introduce a new character sparingly, have her interact with other characters whom we care about, and once she feels like part of the canvas, THEN increase her air time. Don't ram her down our throats from the very start because...it will only make us gag.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Yes, because writing for the theatre was always my main focus. 

For years, I only considered writing teleplays, like the ones aired on programs like PBS' American Playhouse.  Only when I got accepted to a dramatic writing program whose emphasis was intense practice in writing across all media (stage and screen) did I really consider writing for television.  For me, being raised on 1980s ATWT, it seemed very close to theater in the round to me.  

 

I have to be honest and say that I really only considered writing for a soap as a temporary, not a lifelong career goal.  As I began to study how to write, storyboard and shoot scripts and as I delved into writing screenplays, I began to look at broadening my portfolio and I eventually expanded my views on television, especially considering some of the high-quality content on streaming platforms, which seems less bound by the constraints that seem to bind network T.V.

 

Yes, Televest.  Every now and then, I forget and then am reminded that they exist.

Perhaps had I been persistent and called the office more than once in 2001, something may have panned out but it felt like a dead-end to me and so, I didn't pursue it.

Writing for the theater was my goal, I was enrolled in a full-time pre-professional writing program with a school that only accepts 20 students per year, so I really had a laser like focus on, not only completing my M.F.A. but to maintain a high G.P.A., so anything that didn''t seem to go with that goal, I promptly tossed aside.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks. I was just curious at to the timing (the recent post-Moonves CBS drama) and if the allegations surrounding Mal (what Abhi Sinha posted about, Milstein’s exit) had an impact. Of course, that may all be under tight wraps if so. 

 

Sounds like more rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic/business as usual. I just wonder, beyond the Rosaleses, how much of what we saw was McDaniel- or Sony-dictated and how much was MY leaving his mark. As you mentioned, much of the damage to the show’s look and feel preceded Mal by many, many years, so those are decisions higher up, but the claustrophobia really escalated in the last few months. The slapdash pacing and hopscotching of emotional beats are all on Mal, as that was his stated vision, but of course those choices are signed off on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I think so, too. A new detective is in town, and Paul is showing him the ropes. Perhaps he upstages Paul when it comes to a big case? It actually what I always wanted done with Ignacio Serricchio's character (name escapes me at the moment). He fit into the cast nicely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't have any inside info but seems to me that the execs keep picking someone for these EP/HW roles who can cow tow to those execs and handle the huge personalities behind the scenes (i.e. Braeden and Bergman).  It also seems that they have rotated who gets the power to run the show. CBS/Sony win every once in a while i.e. installing Pratt/Phelps and Bell family has won a few times (Maria Bell, Sussman/Alden).  The choice of Josh Griffith is unreal.  He's like Megan McTavish and Dena Higley all rolled into one. At least with both MM and DH, they achieved some high ratings on their shows in years past.  Griffith has absolutely never been successful as a head writer. He writes dime store novels and is well connected in Hollywood.  No doubt a smart guy. He has the unique distinction of doing more damage in his year plus at Days than Dena did in all her head writing stints.  

 

Why the execs cannot promote a female to each role from with in the YR production family tells me that the very capable women there don't want the role.  Sally MacDonald would probably be a great EP.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

This is one of the most wrong things you've said in a long history of overconfident wrong posts. Josh Griffith is indeed a terrible hack today, but his work at OLTL in the '90s was more successful than McTavish and Higley put together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

The only reason Griffith's work on OLTL was successful was because he was paired with Michael Malone.  Griffith's strength has always been day to day script writing and character based scenes.. but plot was never his strongest suit.  It was why I was hopeful when Higley/Griffith was paired because Higley had great ideas.. she just needed someone to flesh them out so that the story/idea worked for the character instead of making the character work for the story (Her Days stint in 2008/9 caused a spike in their ratings with the Sami/Nicole baby switch and Night Hope made sense given all the repressing Hope was doing of her emotions).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've seen Malone work alone. Griffith was necessary, lol. He was brought in to make Malone's work manageable for soap format, and he did so, but he didn't stop there.

 

Higley has never been a remotely competent HW. She lucked into a few gimmicks. As a creative she's trash and always has been.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm more curious to know why Josh is head writing the show when he came in as a temporary replacement for Lisa de Cazotte (a supervising producer & probably one of Steve Kent's cronies from SANTA BARBARA). Maybe Lisa is coming back & Sony installed Tony as executive producer because being showrunner would be too much for breakdown-prone Josh. I'll poke my sources... 

 

The Rosales family is all Angelica. Don't let her fool you! She installed her friend to oversee Y&R and that friend is out of her depth. Margot Wain is overseeing B&B and PRICE IS RIGHT. Without someone like Margot Wain running interference between Angelica & Y&R, the show will never recover. Maybe this is why B&B has been steadier while Y&R been flung about with no care at all. 

 

From my own experience of trying to get an internship at AMC in the early-00s, they had zero interest in bringing in someone who wasn't a friend or family member. It seemed like their writing program was the same way. The Sony soaps, which could easily have a writing program if they wanted to invest in the next generation of talent. So could B&B. So could DAYS. At this point, I feel like they don't want to get better, invest in the future, etc. It's sad to see.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Griffith has never been successful.  Malone was the force behind OLTL success with sweeping stories. Griffith probably helped with pacing, scripts, breakdowns and some story beats.  He's been awful as a sole head and had to be rescued by Malone during his second tenure.  While Dena is a hack, I give her and Quan credit for the first six months after Griffith left in cleaning up the nightmare he left behind.  I never said McTavish was great, but she crafted some very successful stories on AMC (not on GH, OLTL or GL).  Dena lasted three years on OLTL and it was watchable for some of her tenure. Not so with Griffith. He is a horrible choice for Y&R.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Just watched the episode concerning Olivia's drug use and Abby's persistence, etc. Donna Mills did stellar work in this episode, as did Tonya Crowe and Brian Austin Green (Brian).
    • But by Dinah and Hart...Hart especially looked as if he could not tie his own shoes!  Ed, Holly, Alan, Alex Henry and Vanessa among others were not able to put Roger down....Dinah???
    • The preaching seems to end before the Barnes settle in late December, 1981. The stuff that felt overly religious (the Davidsons believing a miracle will save Lori rather than a surgeon, Jeff's miraculous recovery from a beam of light) was quickly nixed because it wasn't working. The closest thing that you get to that under the Barnes is when Dennis Fraser, the drunk driver who killed Nora and Scott, turns his life over to god. The born-again redemptions out of nowhere seem to stop fairly early into the Barnes' run. I do think Miriam's transformation was much more delicately done with her turning on her bestie Nancy because Nancy was seducing Charles, Miriam's wealthy father, so Miriam offers to testify for the Davidsons in the trial against Nancy over possession of Nora's house. In turn, Nancy repays the favor by pumping an emotionally distraught Miriam with barbituates while Miriam carries on her affair with low level thug turned political aide Norm Elliott. Miriam is used by everyone into her life and finally lands herself in the hospital becasue she has become so addicted to the pills. At the hospital, it is the friendship and kindness of the Davidsons that brings Miriam to a more peaceful place. The Davidsons ability to forgive is both appealing and, at times, dramatically limiting. In this case, the Davidsons lead Miriam to her new Mama, Ione Redlon. Now, under Vinley, Miriam is determined to reconnect with her son, Frederick, and her ex-husband, Paul.   My bigger issue with the Barnes' writing is that they write the storylines with twist endings that sorta come out of nowhere. I know the resolution to the Kate Carrouthers mystery sorta plays out like that so I am curious to see how I feel about that.  The biggest change throughout the writing teams has been the view of morality. Winsor had many characters who could be viewed purely through the lens of black and white, but others explored the shades of gray (often younger people). The brief head writerless period was much better at embracing an action doesn't make a person and there characters were much more gray or at least evil at a more local level (Nancy, in this period, only flirts with her brother-in-law where as later she is actively providing pills to Miriam to keep her addicted and away from her own father). The Barnes, for the most part, seem to embrace this level of political corruption that seems to permeate throughout the show making it clear that power (as well as money) is the root of evil. Even criminal Vince Cardello is presented as less evil than Charles Carpenter, though Carpenter's murder of a resident of his complex was rewritten to relieve Carpenter of any responsibility in the matter. Vinley's work seems more into exploring the why or delving deeper in general. Babs Farley, the hooker who is looking to reclaim her life, is such an intriguing character. She is given such meaningful monologues regretting her decisions and desperately trying to keep away from the hands of her former pimp, Ron Washington, who hasn't appeared yet. Monk and Fernandez seem to be wrongly accused of Lori's attack and there seems to be hints of racism that the show is looking to address. Marianne confronts Gil about his feelings towards God in relation to their mother's death years earlier.  There does seem to be a layer of misogyny to Vinley's work, but it's early so I'll be curious to see how this plays out. There are a lot of attacks on women (Lori is nearly raped, Babs was beaten, Nancy is on the verge of being blackmailed for sex by Tab, and the Russ / Marianne / Gil scenario has hints of toxic masculinity. It's very early so it'll be neat to see if that is maintained.  Jerry TImm lasts about a year I think (March, 1982 - March, 1983). One of the episodes on TouTube has a comment suggesting that Timm was fired by CBN because he had done something in his past that came to light. It didn't seem to be clear what that was.  I like what I've seen of Timm as Gil. He has such a presence that it covers up some of his weaker acting choices. It's unfortunate that he didn't get to play as much of the Gil - Stacey - Amber triangle as his replacement does.  
    • I believe it was Mark Arnold's family that taped all the shows. It was the same with Ariane Muneker - her mother bought a video recording machine in the 1970s, at a time when that type of technology was really expensive John Wesley Shipp's parents also taped all his shows, and has a complete library of every single episode of every soap JWS has appeared on. Same for Cynthia Watros. When the Soap Actors parents pass away, and there are all these VHS tapes in dozens of boxes, it is shame to waste all that. 
    • Personally, I felt that the deletion of the original music from the girls' slumber party episode, and the axing of REM's Losing My Religion from the ep featuring Brenda and Dylan breaking up, were the most painful. The changes really damaged those episodes. I dropped the DVDs after season two, but I've been told by other viewers who kept going that tunes from all the seasons continued being replaced, and the situation only got worse as the DVD releases progressed. Yes, penny-pinching from those in charge was the principle issue, but I wonder how much better the DVDs would have sold if such poor choices had not been made in the name of cost cutting. On the other hand, when Time-Life put out the Vietnam-war era classic China Beach, they dug deep into their pockets and ended up clearing the rights to a whopping 268 (!!!) of the original tracks. This represented 96% of the total. TPTB said that when they were not given permission to use a few of the remaining pieces, they substituted different singers' versions of the exact same songs, in order to preserve the show's integrity as much as possible. The CB set was expensive as heck, to be sure, but to me it was worth it.
    • Oh I knew it was common (I did not realize Muenker's channel was gone - I'm glad I saved all those videos). I just didn't realize it was the case with the rape episode.  I never really felt like she dominated the show in her second stint either, although I can see where she probably did. I can feel it more in some of her first run, because the show was much different before she came in and suddenly a woman we'd seen for a year was [!@#$%^&*] and marrying an entire family.  In that sense Reva is more like Babe than Erica Kane. One of the more infamous AMC lines was, "Babe is love." You just know HB would have said that line about Reva at some point.
    • I disagree; if this were Chris Clenshaw, then I would be worried. But it's a new producer coming in to clearly create the canvas they want to create, and I'm okay with that. Re-introducing characters to shake things up and possibly take some other ones out of the canvas. It'll be interesting to see the finished product.
    • I am ready for our first full week in what feels like a while! They worked Sweeps month!
    • Beyond the Gates: A The Bold and the Beautiful: F Coronation Street: B Days of Our Lives: B- EastEnders: A+ Emmerdale: A- Hollyoaks: B+ General Hospital: C Neighbours: C+ The Young and the Restless: F For me, Beyond the Gates, EastEnders, and Emmerdale led the pack during Sweeps month, with Coronation Street and Days of Our Lives following. General Hospital and Neighbours sit in the middle with what I'd call a "take it or leave it" kind of Sweeps month, and the Bell soaps bombed (per usual).
    • Actors doing this is pretty common. I used to work for a company that produced a very successful sitcom back in the 70s. Actors who were guest stars on the show would ask to be provided tapes of their episodes. I assume they do it for a variety of reasons, i.e. to create a reel of their best work. I know of some soap actors who have uploaded saved work to YT. One is Ariana Muenker, who played Christine Valere on GL. She was uploading scenes from her many soap roles a few months back. Unfortunately, it looks like either she or YT took the channel down. Sharon Gabet and Mark Arnold help the EON YT channel by providing saved episodes. Along with EON eps, Arnold shared a guest stint he did on GL. Those episodes are really interesting because they involve the introduction of Nola's character, which was tied to the Roger storyline. When he came back after faking his death, he hid out at the boarding house. Nola being a snoop figured out something was fishy with him. She ended up helping the police. Very worth seeking out. I don't think anyone else has those episodes.  Makes you wonder if there's more out there than we know of because actors don't want to be bothered to run a YT channel. Can't blame them because it's a lot of trouble, but if only... I agree. While Lucci definitely used her fame from the show to build her brand and get work outside of AMC, Erica was always part of an ensemble. Yeah, she got a couple of whacky stories (like the "unabortion") but she never took over to the detriment of other actors and stories.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy