Jump to content

Facts of life Reboot


John

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 124
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

For anyone interested, both Mindy Cohn and Kim Fields have posted part of their eulogies at Charlotte Rae's funeral to their respective Instagram accounts. They wanted to capture the words for the many lives Charlotte touched.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Now I see why they made Tootie an actress.  They were just writing to Kim's own personality.

 

But, yes, I did love her remarks about Ms. Rae's life and career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Has anyone seen this?  I came across this at total random.  Does The Biography Channel know their clips were used to make this video?

Anyway, it was interesting to me because I'd never seen it.  A lot of these facts were well known but still interesting.

Please register in order to view this content

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yep just watched

 

I felt bad for Felice (Nancy) but she sounds naive. Never believe Hollywood when they promise you the moon. Plau along but remain skeptical and on your toes

 

Also in 1983 NBC was toying spinning Jo & Blair off to a langley college themed show. That may have beem a reason they hired Heather McAdam for the final four episodes of 1982-83 season as Alex. Maybe as a replacement 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It would have made more sense to spin off Jo and Blair than to keep them on FOL and stretch credibility in the process.  (No way would the four girls and Mrs. G. have continued living together, especially w/ two of them now out of Eastland.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's just too dangerous to spin off your two leads, and I'd have worried about what bringing in two new girls would've done for the show and if Kim and Mindy, in particular, would've suffered. I actually thought it was cozy and believable that this created family would stick together as long as they did. When Natalie moved out, it felt like a natural progression that I didn't anticipate or feel was overdue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members


ITA. Blair moving into a dorm and living the college life, I'd believe, but Jo really had no reason to move on campus. If they ever really wanted to go with a Blair/Jo spin-off, the most logical point for me would have been when CR left after the seventh season. End the original series and continue on with the two older girls sharing a (near-)campus apartment and interacting with neighbors and classmates. I don't think Kim Fields or Mindy Cohn were strong enough to carry a show at that time at all ("at that time," because Kim obviously ran sh!t on Living Single in the next decade).

I always did like the vibe of the last two seasons with the girls being women and living adult lives, and maybe just continuing with the four on their own could have worked, but Cloris Leachman really wasn't needed, and the add-on kids really dragged down the show's burgeoning maturity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I do agree that cloris leachman wasnt needed.  I would have ended the show with Mrs. G marrying and leaving...or had the 4 girls sharing the house and getting into more adult stuff...living and learning the facts of life without their rock Mrs. G around.

 

And I think had the show spun blair/jo off after the left Eastland..we would have been robbed of the Edna's edible era..and there were some great episodes during that era.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I loved the Edna's Edibles era (looking at the fire that destroyed it, I get wanting a change but it sort of felt like the end to Edna's real mark on the show, like "we're done with you Charlotte"). I'm not too fond of the Over Our Heads era or the last two seasons. Charlotte Rae had the right idea leaving when she did, it was time (not to mention she was practically a guest star most of the time on her own show or just comic relief). But I think the real problem I had was that Cloris Leachman wasn't necessary. I love Leachman but the girls didn't need a mother figure. It would have been more interesting to have them on their own, still together. But I get why they did it. But it felt like while they wrote to the girls aging, they still had them as "young girls" in their minds, if that makes sense? I think the show actually regressed a bit. I also had some issues with the reunion of the 'lost girls'. It just felt "too sitcomy". And Jo being an outsider felt like something that should have played out in Season 2 not in 1986. I guess the writers forgot Jo was around Sue Ann, Cindy and Nancy. Not that they ever seemed to interact from what I recall but they were around. It felt a little forced to me and sort of shallow.

 

And personally I didn't love Jo in the later years. Nancy was so much more natural and happy earlier on. It felt like she was over it for a long time. IDK. I know why they had Jo acting the way she did but it often felt "all about Jo". Jo from earlier and Jo from later feel like such different characters to me. No one else felt that drastically different. It's hard to explain, I guess.

 

I didn't hate Andy but he wasn't necessary either. But that was the times. Everyone had to have some obnoxious child that "steals the spotlight" with a witty line. I would have much more enjoyed watching Mrs. G adopt him than flighty Beverly Ann, but it was actually the one part I enjoyed with her and Andy. So I'm torn on them.

 

Mrs. G didn't even need to move away. Just go on a long extended honeymoon and convince Charlotte Rae to come back for visits, but looking back I appreciate her wanting to "be done" so to speak. I actually feel badly for her. She was almost forced out of her own show, IMHO.

 

This.

 

But I wasn't fond of the last two seasons. On it's own, I suppose, it wasn't bad but I never really got on board with the Over Our Head seasons. Beverly Ann wasn't needed.

 

I agree that it dragged down the show's "burgeoning maturity". I had said it felt almost like they were 'regressing' but overall the same point.

 

Kim and Mindy were supporting for a reason. Kim absolutely OWNED Living Single years later but she was often very green as Tootie, even though she really nailed the timing as a kid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Y'all make some good, strong arguments.  Nevertheless, I believe that Blair and Jo's graduation from Eastland was the most natural and logical way to close FOL as we knew it.  Now, maybe a FOL w/o the two wouldn't have worked; and if I had been in Brandon Tartikoff's shoes, let's say, I might have been inclined to spin off Blair and Jo and cancel the former series.  But, Blair and Jo in college was a different world (sorry) from Natalie and Tootie in Eastland; and I don't think the two worlds meshing together under Edna's Edibles made sense.  As it was, it seems as if the Edna's Edibles-era episodes focus more on Blair and Jo's exploits at Langley than they do on anything Eastland-related.

 

 

"Family Matters" would be another example, even though Harriet Winslow was only recast, not written off entirely.

 

Didn't I read somewhere that Bill Cosby once considered killing off Clair Huxtable and having "The Cosby Show" revolve him raising the kids singlehandedly when there was some BTS issue w/ Phyllicia Rashad?

 

Agree.

 

As I saw it, Over Our Heads was a natural progression for the girls' maturity.  They were older, and not working anymore for Mrs. Garrett (at her bougie gourmet shop).  Now, they would be equal partners in this new venture.  (Plus, I think running a novelty store allowed new show runners Deidre Fay and Stuart Wolpert to indulge in their fondness for visual/gag humor.)

 

But you're right, KMan: it did seem as if Mrs. G. was being marginalized, in retrospect.  Perhaps they could have kept the theme of running a gourmet shop and catering business, but updated to fit the girls' emerging personalities better?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I agree. I really have enjoyed this story from the beginning. I feel like it needed the time for us to care about Doug. They've done a nice job of explaining his motives and making me care for him. I still feel like he's doomed and Vanessa will end up being a widow and now I'm invested in that *not* happening now that I've fallen for him. Friday was good but so was the entire week. I think they're doing such a nice job of keeping things moving. We got good movement with Bill's story this week, Chelsea is attempting to date, Andre and Dani are having tough conversations about their relationship, of course Anita reunited with Sharon. There is *so* much going on and I didn't even cover all of it.  I wish all of the soaps would take a page out of BTG book and start rotating their stories. I love that everybody is getting a chance to shine and they don't just sit on one lead story to the point you get sick of it. 
    • Did Jordan Clarke have a departure sometime between 1985 and 1989? I know Robert Newman had three runs: 1981-1984, 1986-1991, 1993-end.
    • Well, they usually weren't on the show at the time for long until the late 90's. But yeah, they really deserved a story centered on them, and not through the lens of Reva.
    • Chelsea was doing the absolute most today! Why was she introducing her sister to a woman she doesnt know? That whole scene was embarrassing. Madison needs to stay away from her bc she is too immature
    • Gosh, what a waste with Lunacy. Why have her live with $B, reveal Finn, pardon her, etc What makes this story incredibly hollow is that what Luna is asking isn't unreasonable - to spend time with her cousin father. She's not asking to move in with them. How hard with it be for Finn to throw her a bone by, say, I'll meet you for lunch/coffee once at week at the hospital cafeteria. Lunacy isn't going to hurt Finn. In fact, all her crimes were related to finding her father and it turns out to be someone she's loved her entire life. Instead of course-correcting the nonsense of last summer, Brad somehow found a way to make this worse! That's a skill... Of all the younger actors B&B has cast during the past 5 years, LY has shown the most growth and range. Why get rid of her? 
    • On the subject of sets (seems more interesting to discuss than the actual show)  Some sets we don't see anymore Lauren/Michael apartment (haven't seen that in years) Victoria's house (are Marian/Tessa living there?) Apartment above Crimson Lights (I think Chelsea was the last resident) Penthouse (Lily's home) Chancellor Estate (Devon/Abby) Chancellor office (once Dark Horse) Nick's house GCAC room (used as residence/hotel room for several characters) Some of these may pop up again. The tack house,for example, was not seen for many months before being used again. Have I missed anything?
    • Thanks for searching through everything. Worked on them so long, just too lazy to check for those links myself, so I am glad you chose to do it! I guess I never did type out anything for 1973-1977 in regards to the preemptions, but they are on the charts at least (and this far back, they don't seem to do any of those "breakouts" anymore, so things are simpler in the 1970's, so eventually I could type those out). 
    • I dump on the Y&R sets problem all the time, but BOLD is no better -- and they're not even introducing new sets. All of their sets are years old, and very few look like they're inhabited by people with money. Is that going to change with this move? I'd rather they save the money spent on another remote, which is no better than an HGTV travelogue, and get some new/better sets.
    • The donut posts here make up for a Friday show that was barely meh. Aside from seeing Anna, I really didn't care much about anything else. While I understand the thought behind breaking up all the sadness with "other scenes," I'd rather they moved right to John's funeral. Instead of hearing a stupid story about John changing some minor character's tire 20 years ago, just move on to the crying. I also thought the Chad and Cat scenes were a waste. I realize not everyone is devastated by John's death to the point of not functioning, but going sky diving is a choice. By the way, Jack and Jennifer are giving me nothing on this return. Please leave asap. DAYS did such a great job with John's death, so ending the week this way was a letdown.
    • Add Dr. Montgomery to list of fine women on this show! I hope the show goes forward with Madison/Chelsea and then once they're developed, bring back Allison, who is now divorced or a widow, for a Madison/Chelsea/Allison triangle.  It would definitely be the hottest triangle in daytime.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy