Jump to content

GH: May 18 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

 

 

They cannot use Liz unless she is there to praise Franko.   "You saved Port Charles".....  It truly is nauseating to see every scene he's in being about praising the character.   Remember how much  Franko was missed when Howarth's negotiations were at a stand-still? Neither do I!  The same with Devry   gone, and not necessary to bring back. Same with Easton while he was gone.

 

The only reason the three of them are still around is because ValenVarni want them there.

 

 

Also, no one needed cheesy Carla Hall as Cook 2. The whole point of referring to an unseen character is that they are never seen.   Her hamming it up did nothing for the story.  Who doesn't have the food for an event started earlier in the day?  Ridiculous.   Glad to see her show is finally going off the air.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can’t believe with these numbers that ABC cancelled The Chew to give GMA more time instead of GH.  I just wish TPTB we’re making a show I was enjoying, so I could support a network that is clearly supporting its soap when there is a cheaper option available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Great job Father Griffin. Banging mother and daughter.  Kiki must love sharing sloppy seconds from her mom........(Yes I know he left the priesthood, but he still walks around like a sanctimonious douc he-bag.)

 

Please register in order to view this content

 

Barbara Stanwyck has her eyes on you Kiki.....

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

OMG I tried to get through six episodes starting with May 14 and nurses ball.  Wow, the show is a mess right now.  When Spinelli is breaking into computers with Jason/Sam, you know the writers are scraping the bottom of the Bob Guza barrel.  I think Shelly and Chris are either burnt out or there are other cooks in the kitchen.  Nothing's working.  The ball numbers were horrible.  Most of the acting has taken a turn for the worse.  And the Anna/Finn/Alexis plot is written at the fourth grade level. Embarrassing for the actors.  But I fear Barbara Bloom's long story bible is on the horizon for GH's final swan song year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't bother blaming these writers for anything anymore. This is ValenVarni's crap and everyone knows it. Whenever CVE and SA start getting on a roll, Valentini goes in and changes the stories to make them about Franko, Nina, Julian or Finn. (As in Laura running for mayor, making a difference.)  Is Mayor Ned or Alexis able to help the city?  Nope Franko and a one off member of Jim Harvey's molestation story come in to save PC.

 

About to watch today's episode to see him start shining his new sparkly penny, EH. I'm sure I'll be a fan of hers, too.

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was about to go through the tv if they had dared have Anna tell Robin that Peter is her brother via a one-sided telephone call.

 

But now, with Anna jetting off to Berkeley, I have a feeling that the conversation will happen off screen which will be just as bad.

 

If we have to sit through this retcon, could they at least attempt to make me care about the players involved?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Personally, I think the Anna/ Robin scene should be on-screen, but they have played her having the same conversation with EVERYONE over and over. I don't need to hear it again,as much as I love FH, We get it ValenVarni. You hired another meh actor and tied him to a family. So what else is new?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The storyline April and Draper are involved in during the summer/autumn of 1979 seems fairly "benign" but soon turns very serious.  April has a VERY intrusive, wealthy mother (Margo Huntington Dorn).  Margo knows that April and Draper (who've recently had a miscarriage and are theoretically never going to be able to conceive another baby) want to buy a house.  Margo hoodwinks them into buying a house they can't afford.  The house is listed at $100,000 (about $400,000 in today's dollars).  Margo pays the first $35,000 and leads Draper to believe the asking price of the house is $65,000 instead of $100,000.  If Draper finds out his meddling mother-in-law paid 1/3 of the cost of the home and tricked him, he'll be mad as hell.   Meanwhile, Draper has received a job offer from a prestigious New York law firm.  Margo pulls some strings and has the senior partner in the firm rescind the offer, to keep April in Monticello.  If Draper finds out about THAT, he'll be even angrier with Margo than he will be about the house trickery.  All of that is "bubbling under the surface" in the fall of 1979 but will be the next major story, as everything begins to spiral out of control.   Yep, you've got the Karrs and their very basic middle-class house, the Victorian-themed place where Miles and Nicole live, April and Draper's old craftsman house with the exposed beams, the Madisons & their Mission revival house, and Margo with her 1970s-chic penthouse.  Each of the sets is completely different.  And their budget was like zero, lol.  
    • It felt weird and out of place.  I get. While I agree with those on here that he's gotten better, it's still really bad. I'm not seeing the "good" acting some see...but I'll give him a B for being better than when he first started. There's potential. I'll leave it at that. 
    • It's like watching paint dry at a slow-ass pace. It's bad acting. Entirely. Excellent? With Claybon? Never. Ever. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Ah! Good to hear. Isn't it especially odd to think that house fictionally exists not far from the Karrs?  Or, that it was designed non-fictionally by the same person who designed April's place?
    • Good to know I'm not the only one who noticed that. Strange and awkward, and I don't know what they're doing with those fades.   -- Finally, had to laugh at how many Emmys this board passed out today.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Not unless they live in an apartment complex. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That was bad. Product placement is fine, but not here, not now. Besides, no one carries their damn detergent to the living room.   Completely and utterly disagree. I thought Brandon Claybon was excellent today -- maybe his best performance since the show started. No recast needed.   Not unpopular with me. That didn't work. The montage was good, but 5 minutes of Amazing Grace? With all those verses? No. What kind of family breaks into a loud version of Amazing Grace after what just happened??? None. Anita's lecture to Leslie was great. Ending the show -- a really good episode with crackling dialogue -- like that was a mistake.  
    • Today, was a fantastic episode. I loved everything about, including Ainta singing, Amazing Grace. I love the family dynamic of the Dupree's so much. They remind me of my own family at times. Martin & Smitty have come leaps and bounds from where they  started. I genuinely felt a connection between them I can't wait to watch it deepen. Dana/Leslie/Sherry/Ana is a piece of work. Her speech at the Dupree's about her "concern" for Eva and then locking her out of their apartment??? She is pure evil, but I love it. I can't wait to see where the Eva/Kat story goes. There's so much potential there. As for Ted, I need to see Keith Robinson in the role before giving my true critique of Maurice Johnson.
    • I don't recall that we ever saw the exterior of the Madison house.  BUT the interior is definitely Mission Revival.  It has a wrought-iron staircase, and all the doorways & corridors have archways.  I watched a few old episodes over the weekend from that period and really noticed for the first time how uniquely Mission Revival the set is.  
    • I know Daphnee's back hurts, because she was carrying Maurice through those scenes! Still not loving the idea of replacing the actor, but he was giving very little.  Brandon's scenes with Leslie did not hit the way they were supposed to because I was busting out laughing.  One thing I enjoy about this soap is how it plays with the nuance of good and evil. Kat vs Eva and Anita vs Leslie. There are some things that Kat and Anita said that makes it hard to root for them and how the Duprees can be family over everything to a fault. It almost makes them come across as entitled and unlikely at times. And while what Lesile and Eva have done is wrong in different ways, you can see that hurt and sympathize.  Now, what I don't get is what Lesile thought she was doing expecting the Duprees to accept Eva with open arms. Honey, Eva is a Richardson not a Dupree. In the Dupree world, she's Ted's problem unless they choose otherwise, because there ain't a drop of Dupree blood coursing throught her veins (unless we learn otherwise in some twist). Ted is lucky if they don't disown his ass.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy