Jump to content

Stars unable to have lightening strike twice


Soaplovers

Recommended Posts

  • Members

 

"Too Close for Comfort" was lousy enough to hamstring anyone's career, I think.  It's just unfortunate that many actors who DO appear on crap sitcoms often find it difficult-to-impossible to crawl out of that gutter and into more quality work.

 

I know Ann Jillian has been on several series -- "It's a Living," "Jennifer Slept Here" and, of course, "Ann Jillian" -- but as with Morgan Fairchild, I feel like AJ is known more for being AJ than for any particular role.

 

As a comedienne, Delta Burke was/is surprisingly good.  However, I think that it has been difficult for her to shake off the "fat jokes" as well as the stories of tension among her and her husband, Dixie Carter and Hal Holbrook, and Harry and Linda Bloodworth-Thomason.

 

Farrah, Jaclyn, Erik and Larry all have (or had) the same thing in common: they are all associated with iconic shows from the '70's that people even back THEN thought were cheesy (and, in the ladies' case, mildly exploitative).  The ladies have been smarter about parlaying their fame (or infamy) into other work, though.  Jaclyn became known for a time as the Queen of the Miniseries (not to mention, the Queen of Kmart, thanks to her lucrative clothing and fragrance lines), while Farrah was upended a lot of people's misconceptions about her with her work in "The Burning Bed" and "Extremities."  Still, out of all the original "Charlie's Angels," Kate Jackson's probably the only one who managed to get another hit series.

 

 

 

Yep.  Although, to hear HER tell it, working on 3'sC with Nicholl/Ross/West was such a bad experience for her that she deliberately avoided working again in television, or anywhere else, for a long time in order to separate herself from the feelings of acrimony and betrayal.

 

Speaking of...?  I'd probably add John Ritter to the list, if only because most, if not all, of his post-3'sC series never lasted long, and he seemed to have better luck with guest shots and TV-movie work.  Of the post-3'sC shows, "Hearts Afire" ran the longest, barely lasting longer than "Hooperman," but does anyone really consider that show as being successful?  And even though he died just 30 or so episodes into "8 Simple Rules," I don't think THAT show would have fared any better either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 37
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Kirstie Alley didn't get a successful follow up sitcom, but she did win an Emmy in the mid 90s in a dramatic role and ended up playing in more serious roles in the 90s/early 2000s.  And I actually think her weight problems actually made her get a unexpected lease of fame with a reality show detailing an attempt on losing weight (I still recall her reaction to her personal trainer wanting her to climb a bunch of stairs and her trying to run away... comic gold LOL).

 

Julia louis D actually had The New Adventures of Old Christine which was a decent ratings hit and netted her an emmy.. and was loads funnier then Veep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Brain fart, but I was focused on her post MTM career. Other than Ordinary People and that failed show with her as an editor or whatever, it seems like she just faded away. Granted, she had personal and health issues, but it seems a shame. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Harry Anderson, Markie Post, their CBS sitcoms did last a couple years but never even touched achieved the success of Night Court. 

 

Tracy Scoggins. I love her but she never was able to stick around permanently to any show after The Colby's and Dynasty. 

 

Sally Struthers

Valerie Harper

Julia Duffy

Luke Perry

Benjamin Bratt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I feel as though most TV stars can fall into this category. There are more than a few who found success on multiple series, but so many people are associated with just one role, or maybe one long-running, high profile role and one role not as well-known but still mildly successful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

You're right. I think this started out as a kind of one-shot wonder kind of post, and veered off. But is is interesting to ponder why some people seem to disappear, while others maintain a steadier presence on the screen. I mean...do people realize Mark Harmon's been nearly steadily employed since the late 70's? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Man, that's a hard question.  Mark Harmon's had significant, well-received roles on Moonlighting, St Elsewhere, West Wing in between heading series Flamingo Road. Reasonable Doubts and NCIS. Not to mention that TV movie playing Ted Bundy. (and I don't think he gets the respect he deserved for his early NCIS' work)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It was easy for Lucille Ball to have as many hits as she did, because she essentially played the same character on all her shows.  (Her last, "Life with Lucy," flopped primarily because she looked too old and frail to be doing her trademark physical, slapstick comedy.)

 

But there's also Betty White, who has "Life with Elizabeth," "The Mary Tyler Moore Show," "Mama's Family" (to an extent), "The Golden Girls" and "Hot in Cleveland" all under her belt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I've always idolized Larry Hagman for starring in a classic sitcom and a (the?) classic primetime soap.  Beatrice Arthur also struck gold (oof, I swear to G-d I didn't do that on purpose!) with Maude and The Golden Girls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Lorne Greene had long term success with Bonanza but Griff, his follow up lasted half a season. Then there was Battlestar Galactica and Code Red, neither big hits. Viewers loved him as Ben Cartwright...

 

Mike Connors  Mannix then one season of Today's FBI.

 

James Arness - Gunsmoke  then   McClain's Law

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Thanks for sharing; the set, wow. Ten times better than the "penthouse" she lives in now (is that a surprise, though?).
    • I'd be happy to!

      Please register in order to view this content

        I just read the intro and first chapter and I'm already hooked. I know she had a co-author, but I can tell Kim is a firecracker and I'd love to have wine with her and talk sh!t haha. It makes reading the book pretty easy and entertaining. Intro - I had no idea she got a DUI! She shared 3 bottles of wine with a friend at dinner one night in LA, got in her car, was pulled over and thrown in jail overnight.  She admitted it wasn't her first time drinking and driving, but learned a valuable lesson that night. Out of the gate, she's not holding back or hiding anything. Chapter 1 - the announcement that GL was being cancelled. She was driving to Peapack and got a call from Bradley Cole who told her the news. First, that's BS that as one of the faces of GL, you hear the big news from a fellow co-star on your way to work. Granted, the "suits" were traveling to Peapack that day to tell the cast and crew, but still, seems icky. Ironically the news came on April Fools Day. Apparently that was the last day the network could decide whether to cancel or renew, but to Kim's point, couldn't they just pick the day before to avoid the callousness of the 'holiday'. Obviously a sad day in GL history. I thought it was funny, she said the one thing she thought of is "what would Susan Lucci do" in this situation, post-cancellation. And of course she said she'd "find something to hawk on the Home Shopping Network"  You all would know better than me, but part of the title of her book is "seven husbands" and in her intro, she uses Reva's full name: Reva Shayne-Lewis-Lewis-Spaulding-Lewis-Winslow-Cooper-Lewis-Lewis-O'Neill.  However, in the first chapter, she said Bradley Cole was "her 8th (or was it 9th?) husband". Well, Kim, that already contradicts the title of your book and your character's name you touted. 
    • He also was following Holly May 22, 2025 per update (link to post) from @JAS0N47  
    • I was incredibly moved by these scenes, especially Peter's performance. It felt so tender and real, especially when you remember Bo just got out of a years-long coma and wasn't going to be able to put up a front. You're reminded of how long these legends have populated the show when you have a 70 year old man grieving men who were almost 90 or 100, but Bo's response to Victor's death was a poignant reminder of how fresh these wounds are no matter your age. Normally these types of moments don't even make it in soap episodes in recent decades as they are seen as too boring. The more somber moments being balanced by Bo meeting his grandchildren was also lovely.  And the scene where Bo forgave Shawn may be the only time I've been in lock with Brandon Beemer's take on the part.  There's a certain element of suffocation with soaps, as shown here, when you remember so many of the kids are named after long dead relatives, or when they grew up, were paired with the kids of other longtime characters. That aspect always makes me yearn for new blood (new blood that doesn't suck, anyway), but there are other moments, like those with Bo, which make me appreciate all the history the show has.
    • A funny scene, Roger and Sonni go out to eat, at that place that had a colonial theme (I love when soaps have very specific places to eat..I hated the diners on GL, ATWT and AW) and this is just after Rog came back and Sonni hit the headlines and the waitress scremes.."Oh, Roger Thorpe, and YOUR...please dont' hurt me..." and they are all like, "Hey, were just hungry!" (most soaps now have someone go on a murder spree and the rest of the cast and extras look like they havent heard about it."
    • Please register in order to view this content

      @Dion @AMCOLTLLover @Bright Eyes
    • Thanks as always @Huntress always appreciate you popping in and sharing info about these shows. What are you thinking of them at present?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy