Jump to content

NBC talks DAYS future


Recommended Posts

  • Members

During the NBC Executive Session of the Television Critics Association (TCA) annual summer tour, President of NBC Entertainment, Jennifer Salke, voiced her support of the network’s last soap standing — and its new writing team, headed by Ron Carlivati. “We’re feeling really great about the new team in place and we’re evaluating it as it goes,” Salke told the audience. “Right now, we’ve been so focused on the fall and making all these [new] shows. We love the new DAYS and we hope it stays on the schedule forever … Everyone’s feeling really good.”

 

this is from soap digest. This is very encouraging news as shes thrilled about Ron Carlivati. Very encourgaed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 23
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Don't we see this same damn interview every year?

I'm waiting for the interview where Corday just says, "I really just don't know anymore." 

Why can't he just be honest and say that James Reilly ruined Days beyond repair? Days has been trying to get back to normal, but at this point, it doesn't know what normal is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Tastes and times change, but I think identity is exactly a big problem Days has had for decades now.

 

What does it want to be? Sort of familial and down to earth, at least where matters of family and the heart are concerned (as it was in the 1960s through 1980s) even in the midst of larger than life sagas, or does it want to fully embrace the campy outlandishness that James Reilly ushered in once the 1990s rolled in?

 

Corday is clueless, but I also think he wants the show to be everything to everyone and without a set, firm identity, I'm not sure Corday or any writers know what current Days should be.

 

And, yeah, James Reilly brought in high ratings because of outlandish stuff, but I always likened it to car wreck syndrome: Not wanting to look, but unable to look away. The trouble is, take away the gimmicks, and there was no "there", there, ever, and it hurt the show in the long run. Days started - or so I saw via old episodes - as mostly rooted in reality while surrounded by fantasy. But fantasy has eaten away a lot of that reality now, IMO. Days was not Passions, but Reilly had fallen on fake outs, quirks, and goblins, witches, and whatnot for too long and had forgotten that, at heart, soaps are supposedly about love - familial and romantic - and not just "out there" water cooler plot twists for the sake of plot, not driving story forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The show is and forever will be in danger. I don't care what they say. Once it becomes a problem for them financially it will get the axe. DAYS is 'my show' and I love it but I also know there's no guarantees. They can say they want DAYS to go on forever, doesn't mean it will. It has some fans higher up that keep it afloat and Sony isn't a slouch when keeping shows alive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I can't believe a soap that has been at the bottom of the gutter in the ratings for years now is still on the air. I just want to see CM one more time before this soap is canceled for good. I don't see RC raising the ratings at all. I know he has just started but so far the show is still dreadful and the acting isn't helping.

I think people that work at McDonalds make more money than Days does for NBC.  The show has been a financial mess for NBC for years. That's why they have been taping the show 20 years ahead.

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's a sign of the times. It's on "borrowed time" every year, hence their yearly renewals. Yes, DAYS has had an identity crisis (a term that reminds me of a Saved by the Bell episode, but I digress) for nearly 20 years, but many of the now-defunct shows had inconsistent identities during their last 10-15 years. They left the airwaves in 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012.  DAYS is still here.  It must make some sort of profit for NBC or else they would've cut their losses at least half a decade ago. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Odds more likely Parkinsons. Hand tremor is one of the first symptoms, often. Actually it could be any number of neurological issues. Not all are Parkinsons. I think I already posted about Dani's laser focus on her girl. But in case not, this goes double for me! Totally love & also appreciate scenes like these Dani scenes. Showing some layers, she is! Whether its with her sister or her daughter, as long as the subject is family, Dani is down.   
    • 5-21   Have I said how much I like Jacob and Naomi? As the first in-bed couple from Episode 1...and a good guy/good girl couple, I do love seeing their development. Together. And separate. So doing my rewatch, it's great to see them together one moment and making their lives work. And then the next minute, they are off in other stories. I liked the Naomi/Derek scenes. Meanwhile DETECTIVE Jacob is involved in the SilkPress storyline due to Veronica Mars aka Kat on her and Eva's case.    Dani, Dani, Dani. I thought it was a good episode to show her different sides. The outrageous Dani who would kiss her friend in public...and figuratively blow Bill's head off. And then...there's Mama Dani with Chelesa. She is always going to be divisive, ain't she? Sidenote...good to see a bit of sass from Pamela on Vanessa. It's clear they don't like each other. I do wonder if that will turn into a C plot.    Speaking of C plots...well...I still can't believe how invested I have been in the Derek/Ashley mess. And another element in it that I liked this episode was how it was affecting Dani/Andre. Heck, they were all in the montage at the end.   And another speaking of C plots, Bill and that hand. smh. I didn't care for all the Bill/Hayley time, but that hand shake continued. I do wonder where that is going to go. MS perhaps? I believe in rare cases that it can happen to men, but I am probably wrong. Still...a chance to educate.    I loved the Dani/Chelesa scene for sure. I'm sorry that things did not work out for Chels and the girl. But it was nice to see that in the spotlight and something just different for soaps. And it led to such a great talk with Dani.    Mmmmm at the SilkPress/Eva scenes. It was such a visual version of what Eva and Tomas just talked about in the last episode with parents. And SilkPress admitting what she did. I totally missed it the first time around. I live for their scenes regardless. Though I'm starting to think (and the synopsis for this coming week doesn't help), that this A story is about to shift into more of a B story status to focus on the other A stories (Martin's secret and another round of Dani/Bill/Hayley).
    • FROM THE VAULT: WEEKLY DAYTIME NIELSEN RATINGS: WEEKS OF 3/26/73-3/30/73 & 4/2/73-4/6/73:

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Priorities

      Please register in order to view this content

      It really is too bad that Will/Sonny/Paul/ Andrew aren’t full time. John’s death could’ve led to so many storylines for them. 
    • FROM THE VAULT: WEEKLY DAYTIME NIELSEN RATINGS: WEEKS OF 3/12/73-3/16/73 & 3/19/73-3/23/73:

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I had to think about how Tate is related to everyone. First:  major storylines of John and Bo. Tate is obviously grandson of John via Brady Black. Tate is twice-connected to Bo: Bo is Tate's great-uncle via Isabella. Bo is Tate's great-uncle via Kimberly. Tate is separately related to Pandrew: Andrew is Tate's uncle on the Donovan-Brady side. Paul is Tate's uncle on the Black side. Connections to young people in town: Via Kimberly and Roman, Tate is related to Johnny and Will. Will is Ari's father, so Tate is related to Arianna via Will. Via Isabella and Justin, Tate is related to Sonny. Sonny is Ari's third parent, so Tate is connected to Ari via Sonny. I started to diagram out second cousins, third cousins, half-cousins, half-uncles, "once-removed", etc, and then stopped myself, LOL. What matters is that they are extended family to one another.
    • Oh, I See it now! Thanks
    • And proved what a well-placed line of dialog can cover.  Has there been any mention of Claire?
    • Johnny said today that Sami and Sydney were trying to fly in from Sicily, but were stopped by a volcanic eruption because the ash had grounded all the planes.
    • I just finished with today & it was definitely odd. I can understand that they've got to fill in extended family. There was just so much of it. Without even one scene of Marlena. That, to me, was problematic. However, I'm not going to jump to any conclusions. We'll see what tomorrow brings. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy