Jump to content

Y&R: December 2016 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

 

Bergman's delivery is awful. If the goal is to make Jack an unlikable pissy bitch, it's working. Someone deaf and blind could see and know what Jack's doing is just out of spite. But he did have a point. Why is the competition in the building still? There's Newman and Chancellor they could be in.

 

Heinle looked like a mess today. Get this woman a [!@#$%^&*] stylist, please. She also looks bored as hell every damn time she's on-screen. Get some energy. I like Thompson as Billy though. It's working for me.

 

Nice to see Cane and Ashley interact. They'd be a good match but the man is so boring. And Eileen channels Kristen so much more now playing Ashley IMO. I didn't care for her RHOBH co-star until the end but I guess it was a cute guest stint. She looked icy as hell until she started talking.

 

I don't really see what Hillary is saying in regards to Devon, but it does seem like all he wants to do is buy things as if that's the answer. The intention is good but the execution sucks. I actually bought them as a couple at the end when she finally came around. I want more of that. And when Hillary was talking about making over their new place I really hope that god-awful carpet is the first to go. (Points to Neil giving Devon a pep-talk but it's hard to ignore the Hillary aspect of their relationship when he wants advice ...)

 

A meh episode is still good though. I liked the episode enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

 

I'm wondering if SS is trying to spin the stuff that Chuckie wrote to give Hilary a little more dimension.  But the problem with that - as you pointed out - was that we saw her do those things onscreen.  Those little side eyes and smirks takes away from the grandstanding and does nothing to humanize or soften her.  She has to have one person that she can be real with.

 

IA regarding AH.  Those scenes with Cane at B&S would have been more impactful ("Two can play that game" or whatever it was she was saying) if the character was styled more powerful.  It's hard to take Victoria seriously as an important and formidable business person when she looks like she does.  I'd even go so far to say that I think AH can deliver lines pretty convincingly.  

Please register in order to view this content

  But her look is all wrong.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Those side eyes and smirks are things that someone needs to tell Mishael Morgan to stop. They take her from being a vixen to being an evil villain.  It was totally unnecessary since we had the scene with her and that guy. We understood her manipulation without it. 

 

 

 

I like PB as jack but he's not some grande thespian as some make him out for be. He's gotten lazy and tends to fall back on the same quirks. Boss Jack will fall back into the same saccharine song as soon as Jack gets a love interest. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

What's wrong with her having side glances?? Dru and Phyllis did this all the time. I mean Phyllis was an all-out psycho in the past but in the later years, she still kept it up. No one really accuses her of being a villian, why should it be any different for Hilary. I like that this is her personality. Dru did it all the time and was loved for it. I believe Dru is one of the most loved characters on Y&R ever.  I  don't understand why Hilary should be expected to hold back on the antics. To me, it makes her even more interesting and less generic. I just don't get all the hate for this character. She is a saint compared to the majority of the females on this show: Phyllis, Chloe, Sharon, Chelsea, Nikki. Just saying. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't hate her for the side eyes and smirks.  I don't hate her at all, actually.  I love the character.  Those things should be one facet of the character, not the only one.  JMO.  Hilary needs a little more depth and dimension like Dru's characterization.  She wasn't all evil, all the time and she had a trusted friend in Sharon.  Hilary doesn't. 

 

Hilary and MM are one of the reasons I watch this show, so no hate here :-)

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Waaay too young. 

 

And besides I don't think anyone will ever be accepted as a Dru recast. There are just some actresses and characters that can't or shouldn't be recast.

 

I love Hilary as Hilary. And it looks like the writers love Hilary as well so I can't wait to see where she can go from here. And even though I love her with Devon, after another poster here suggested her with Noah, I can't get the possibilities out of my mind. I want that to happen one day.

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think @Darn @Faulkner and others have a fair point re: it being an unfortunate look and coincidence. I can see their point about the two Black husbands in rapid succession, without much time in between. Frankly, based on the early casting notices I thought before the show's debut (and I still suspect) that Ted's crimes might be far worse than infidelity or a secret baby. That would've mixed it up more. It's a soap, people are going to cheat, but it might've given them more variety if Nicole was stepping out first. Still, I wouldn't trade the Leslie/Eva reveal material for anything right now. Still, Fanfic Account #3 is just looking for any weapon to attack the show for not accepting his unsolicited scripts. When it's not the husbands it's Martin, or Chelsea or Dani. He's seething it got renewed.
    • I'm pretty sure Lucy and Bridget never even have another scene together for the rest of the time they're both on the show. Bridget isn't even invited to the wedding! The lack of community feeling and continuity of non-romantic relationships during this period is very jarring. Characters suddenly only seem to interact with a handful of other characters, rather than characters across the canvas. I'm deep into 1997 in my watch right now and find that it's even stranger because the show goes back and forth between ignoring history in order to manufacture some kind of separation between characters (for example, at one point Amanda refers to the Coopers as a family that the Spauldings "barely know," despite her and Alan spending the better part of 1996 going to war with Buzz over 5th street, and Alan has absolutely no reaction when he finds out about something bad that's happened to Abby, which seems pretty out of character given how close they were in 95/96) and ignoring history in order to create a sense of community that doesn't quite fit (characters who couldn't stand Amanda are suddenly acting all buddy buddy with her). The wheels really feel like they're coming off in 1997 (although I know some would argue that the wheels started to come off years earlier). Watching the Marcus/Dahlia romance again from a 2025 perspective is so weird. Marcus is a full grown man who must be at least in his mid-20s and he's dating a teenager who is not only still in high school, but is still fully a year away from graduation, and no one says anything about how creepy that is. I feel like the buzz around Marcus gave the illusion that the show was more invested in him than it ever actually was. Even during his "big" story where he's arrested for Cutter's murder, he actually doesn't appear on screen very often. He's imprisoned, Griffin is brought on, other characters make a fuss about trying to get him out, but there's a long stretch of time where he doesn't appear at all. I've been keeping episode counts while I watch and between Cutter's death in mid-November of 1995 and the end of the year Marcus/Mambo only appears 7 times (and of that only twice in December).
    • The letter reading was very emotional, and Maeve really got to me too. I was a little worried because Vanessa doesn't give a speech at the funeral, which surprised me, but then we got the private letter reading and her true emotional reaction and I was satisfied there. The YouTube channel I watch these episodes on (if not on our Vault), also had upset commenters talk about how Nola's line about Henry not accepting her at first/seen as a gold-digger was totally untrue. It's sad the writers don't do their homework and give fans the respect (and the characters respect). And yep, Bill got up and spoke at the funeral too, which was nice.  I didn't even realize that was Sharon Leal until you said it!  I had to Google it. I loved Sharon Leal in Boston Public back in the day haha. LOL at your Reva/Josh ALWAYS commentary. What is RME though?
    • Leslie is an extreme liar and manipulator. I'm not sure what her point was in trying to convince Nicole she wasn't trying to hurt her. As much as Eva did help orchestrate the entire plot I feel like there was too much piling on. Eva never said she wanted to be a Dupree so Anita was extremely out of line for that comment.  
    • Thanks!

      Please register in order to view this content

       That's positive and something to look forward to for sure, because you're right, 1996 so far isn't nearly as good as 1995. Ohh - what is Lonatrat?  Sadly you're probably right. I did feel like David was rarely seen once Marcus came on. That would have been an interesting spin, having Frank and Tina be teenage lovers and Dahlia really being his daughter. I'm getting the sense that Tina won't be seen too much anymore, as she just left Dahlia with Frank/Eleni as she's heading to jail for a while. I like the Tina actress too!  Her voice sounds a bit like Rosie Perez to me, which I love. I tried to find her online, but coming up empty. This was the only thing I could find about Tina Crede - a character snapshot video with clips and stills of her (randomly starting just before the 1:00 mark):

      Please register in order to view this content

      That's wild that the David actor is nearly 40 here! Definitely surprises me.
    • 5-6   Meh. It already looks like a scattershot week.    5-5 was actually a good episode. Damian and Lily. Phyllis finally going on the warpath that I knew she could get on with Billy and Sally. Nate started to question Audra and Victor's alliance. And I was not even bugged by Kyle and Claire.   But then there's Cole's off-screen story. Kyle and Claire going back to being whiny. And them even wanting Adam's penthouse just sounded like trying to keep the set around. And Diane shouldn't even give a flying frak about Billy's opinion. And Tessa, Daniel, and the guitars...yeeeah no.   But hey...JM looked good in that short. And those pants.  I agree. One of Y&R's good points with fans has always been that you do at least see the vets. And IN stories. 
    • One of the things that I found unnecessary and a bit disturbing about Ambitions was that in almost every episode someone was holding or shooting a gun.  Jamey and Ron seem to have the same fetish.
    • I had thought that there was a Tommy Biddles on there, but then I realized I was thinking of Dr. Biddles on Santa Barbara. Never mind! 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy