Jump to content

GH: February 2015 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 964
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

John, Ron watched the show for decades just like all of us. I appreciated the PC nod, especially since IIRC they were referencing what happened to Audrey, who was nicely featured in the anniversary episode.

I don't think Ron Carlivati hung the moon but I also don't think he's the Antichrist. He loves the show, he's just kind of a dick, and he is not as brilliant as he thinks he is. He is arrogant and lazy and he acts a fool on Twitter, but so do a lot of the people he talks back to. He simply should not engage, but instead he takes his fights both online and onscreen. I don't have a reason to call the dude names when taking apart his ego and how it pollutes his work is much more effective. And I'm not going to attack for just anything just because, let alone a nice mention of a notable event that happened at General Hospital. I look forward to your inevitable backtrack when you calm down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The fans tend to have bad ideas for their favorite characters each and every time. They want their favorite to have a baby, to find true love, to be blissfully happy...but please no reduction in screentime. Sonny's fans want him absolved of all crimes, Jasam fans want their couple together no matter if the show would be better off not having them together...any writer who listens to the fans is insane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

deVry seems to hang out with Ryan Carnes and Ryan Paevey a little too much.

I'd only want Chris if played by Nolan North. Not like he's doing anything. Maybe some voice over work. But the cast is too large as it is. Where do these rumors come from? LOL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Technically he knew everyone who worked at GH from 97-01 (the years of crossovers), and I guess up to '03.

North seems very busy, and he doesn't seem to remember his soap days fondly. I hope he doesn't return because I might have to watch and I couldn't bear that.

Chris and SJB Carly were my "I'll cut you if you even look at them the wrong way" soap characters in the late '90s...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    •   you made me laugh.  They haven't found a network for this potential reboot but yeah. I've heard Great American Family and Pureflix referred to as the "White Christmas channel" in contrast to the (relative) diversity of the Hallmark channel.
    • Oh? Novels you say? Intriguing. Some would say the header might have been a sign it could be a bad episode.     I don't think I was as bored as everyone else with this episode, but I'll see how I feel after a rewatch.   Heck, the actor playing Tomas even showed up and seem more comfortable. Actually so did the actor playing Derek.
    • High praise.   At last...?   *cough*CVE*cough*
    • I had to stop watching early last week because I could not tolerate another interminable scene of Genie Francis valiantly attempting to keep pace opposite a disillusioned and confused Maurice Benard. Nevermind that the scenes largely consisted of Laura kissing the ring for some godforsaken reason, how is his performance acceptable? He’s painful to watch.
    • Apparently Jake Tapper was supposed to be on Jimmy Kimmel tonight to pimp his book of lies. That appearance was canceled. https://latenighter.com/news/jimmy-kimmel-live-cancels-monday-night-taping/
    • I was obsessed with the original Party of Five, it used to be one of my  favorite primetime soaps.  In my mind, Neve Campbell is "the star of Party of Five" - I've never seen the Scream movies. So I watched the reboot with great attention. I kept comparing and contrasting each reboot sibling with the original.  Lacey Chabert's character in the original was a precocious child who played the violin.  Her counterpart in the reboot was also smart but she danced. Not quite the same.  Neve Campbell's teen character in the original was a moody student, and her teen counterpart in the reboot became politically active and tried to help other teens that had immigration issues.  Etc.   I knew all the secondary characters in the original, and kept waiting to see if they'd have counterparts in the reboot. Some of that compare/contrast stuff was distracting to me at first, but ... eventually I realized that the reboot was a completely different show, and I came to embrace it for what it was, and let go of my comparisons.  I felt that the reboot existed as its own separate identity, and there was no need to be familiar with the original at all.  Other than the ages of the five siblings and the restaurant, the reboot had very little in common with the original. The reboot was a good show by itself and I liked it, and was disappointed that it was cancelled.
    • When he returned  to DAYS in 1991 it was at the behest of Deidre Hall wanting the two of them to make the DAYS scene together again & they both got preferential billing, too, in the closing credits. They did the Mexican story first with Bo & Carly and with John & Isabella & also Lawrence & the actress who would much later play Gladys on GH.  After that they did this amazing story Marlena loved 2 men but society would not allow it. I have always felt that Deidre deserved an Emmy for that particular story.  
    • Let's be real - no one  is interested in a "diverse" reboot. It's a WASP show through and through. Just do it cheaply on a budget and put it on Great American Family.
    • Dan Curtis was a good producer and director but he didn't know how to structure a daytime show. After he fired Art Wallace (or Art left after the first 13 weeks and never returned) Dan was the head writer. There are interviews (video and print) with Sam Hall, Violet Wells and others on the writing team who say as much. Dan wanted cliffhangers and shock value daily. He was undisciplined. If you look at other soaps that aired during that time, they were better produced and acted. You didn't constantly see boom shadows and tips of cameras and have sets rattle and actors forget lines (daily). I loved a lot of DS but it was campy and poorly produced. When a scene or episode was flawless (which was very rare) it was a revelation. It could have been so good. They needed to slow down a bit but it was expensive to put on and I think the network was constantly nervous about the content.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy