Jump to content

ALL: Re-casts that changed a storyline?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 121
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

GL's Blake from Elizabeth Dennehy;s vaguely humorless and uptight version to Sherry Stringfield's scheming sexually charged dynamo.

ATWT's Tom---from Justin Deas' anti-establishment goof ball to Gregg Marx's sexy legal eagle to Scott Holmes' self-righteous prig.

ATWT's Emily---Melanie Smith was a softer, sex kittenish schemer. KMH's Em grew into a heartless, amoral bitch.

But on some level, all recasts change the interpretation of the character. Sometimes it's good...sometimes not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The Jessica recast on OLTL was meant to dramatically change the character, IMO, and it did, but not always in the way they'd hoped.

It was obvious what they had intended from the beginning, where we saw an 'edgier' Jessica (now played by Bree Williamson) beat the hell out of a vending machine, take charge of an accident scene and trip breezily into Antonio's strong arms. The hair, makeup, attitude, clothes were all a bit more mature. Erin Torpey quit, they wanted to give the character a bit more sex - fine, we saw that coming. The problem was, first, that Bree's attempts to play an 'edgier' Jess at the time fell very flat, and then the pairing with Antonio, which was so gross from the outset, ended up dominating her storyline for years. After just a few weeks in the role she defaulted to a classical soap archetype, the damsel in distress with the occasional touch of feistiness, a plaything for supervillains and bad guys, everyone from Mitch Laurence to the Music Box Killer to Tico Santi. After recasting the role with fanfare, the major lesson OLTL had apparently taken away from the experience was that Jessica was now fair game to be a generic soap heroine - when she wasn't crazy and in heat, she was barefoot, pregnant and kidnapped.

Jessica stayed that way basically to the end of the show, with only her DID and her alters making the character vary at all, veering between crazy whore and pregnant, endangered madonna. It destroyed the character. And it wasn't all Bree Williamson's fault, because Bree Williamson can act when she is given strong material. It was a choice the lazy writers and execs at OLTL (along with Brian Frons) made, as though the recast had cleared their way to make the character fit into a standard box, along with Michael Malone's obsession with Antonio Vega and his desire to grow the young Jessica into a sort of classical adult heroine that instead mutated into a very bland damsel. Jessica never was really Jessica again, she was just a collection of all the things wrong with modern soaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

When Nicholas Walker took over the role of Max on OLTL, the character was given a new face and softer,romantic personality. Of course, when James DePaiva resumed the role, the plastic surgery was forgotten and he became the womanizing cad he had always been.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She was a schemer, right before NF took over the role, but NF brought an incredible amount of sexual energy, strength and depth to Cecile. I kind of remember the story had to do with "secret" chapter of Mac's book, which was the Sandy Cory introduction. I remember SK being almost comical when she was trying to scheme her way to look at the chapter. NF upped the ante in so many ways and it was really unexpected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Days started up the Pawn storyline in November 1985, with Robert Poynton playing the bandaged man. Drake Hogestyn would take over the role once he unmasked in January 1986.

There are a few interviews with Hogestyn that state he auditioned for the part in December 1985. Something must have changed as the story started. Poynton might have always been intended to be temporary - he did speak onscreen on a couple of occasions and was allowed to stand up straight beside Steve - but I have a feeling that Days realized that they could turn it into something bigger than what it started out as.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wouldnt say neither of those recasts changed the direction of a storyline as all happened at last a year after the role was vacant. There was no storyline to be changed as they weren't stepping in the middle of one that the characters were involved in.

I also defintely wouldnt say they did a complete 180 with AM as Kendall. In fact it was the opposite. Kendall and Erica had made peace when she left town but when AM joined the show, its like they rebooted the character back to where she was a year before she left, fighting and feuding with Erica. The character regressed back to where she was storywise with Erica.

I'll add Jonathan Jackson's return as Lucky on GH. The show was writing Lucky as some pathetic loser when it came to his relationship with Liz, whom they were moving forward with Nikolas. When JJ returned, the story shifted to emphasize Lucky as the victim and they slut-shamed the hell out of Liz to prop him. I doubt the story would have went that route if GV remained

Also, Adam Gregory as Thomas on B&B. DTB was dropped in a hot minute when they decided they were going to do that Taboo story. They needed a man who could be believable with KKL's Brooke. Sort of a reverse of the question as they recasted before the story began so the story changed the actor playing the character

Timothy Gibbs as Kevin on OLTL. Kevin Stapleton was popular in the role and played him with charm and humor as the show wrote he and Cassie as a strong romantic duo. JFP came along and replaced him with her FOJ and the show decided to write that awful affair story

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They rebooted Kendall for at least a year or two upon the recast. And it worked, because Alicia was great. But then they finally evolved her character and Erica's - a little too much in the long run, IMO. I was glad they could finally love each other, but at times they were a bit too cozy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Weren't some of the storylines dropped due to Adam Gregory's religious beliefs?

I remember how they completely changed Lucky's character back when JJ reclaimed the role, if only that happen when DT reclaimed the role of Billy

What about Brenda Epperson and Shari Shattuck as Ashley when Eileen left and then reclaimed the role

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I found it to be a rather odd way to deal with a character departing for parts unknown.
    • Today reminded me as to why I’m a little disappointed in the name that the new Pope chose

      Please register in order to view this content

      Luckily, EJ and Johnny, and pretty much every other character saved today’s episode.  I didn’t expect Javi to be the one to save Sarah though, and I don’t mind it at all, because if it means that Javi is finally going to get his own identity/character, away from his douchy bf, I’m all for it. Javi’s scenes would’ve been a lot better had it not been for him. EJ and Johnny were the best part of today. Their conversation hit a lot of important beats and I’m so looking forward to seeing them play out. And now that EJ knows that Johnny is going to work for Xander, that opens up another dynamic to their storyline and to the Kiriakis family storylines as well. Tying them all together could be really good. There are so many story possibilities that can come out of this. And I thought Carson Boatman did a pretty good job again too.  I also liked that Johnny was there to comfort Chanel after everything that happened with Sarah. They’re so good together. But I do have mixed feelings about Chanel possibly forgiving Johnny so quickly. Hopefully, the question that she asked him at the end of today leads to more conflict for the two of them.  And yeah, still no changes in Alex’s character lol 
    • Awesome, thanks so much for taking the time to grab this episode. I had a quick review of your rip because I was curious why it was 700MB and 30 minutes. The first 10 minutes of the episode is 3169 (opening credits at 5 minutes and again at 15 minutes). I thought we had the full HD version of ep.3170 on the YouTube channel, but it appears they added the wrong episode but labelled it 3170. 
    • I guess, according to Mike Manning in the Michael Fairman chat, he was almost Derek 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • OIC Thanks. I saw thzt & looked for a prior  ... never mind. 
    • I imagine Brad will blow through all the money in a year and come crawling back, just as Portia warned him not to.
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • That's a name I haven't heard in a minute. Thanks! 
    • Well, since I'm still up unexpected past my growing-into-it bedtime. lol.   I finally got to rewatch Monday's. I even rewatched Friday's to take it all in. Now that we got the reveal and hit the climax of the SilkPress Sheila storyline, now we get to watch the aftermath and/or turns that come with its climax. So far, so good. Friday left us with three cliffhangers. And what I found surprising was how I felt about them over a rewatch.    I know some of you all felt a way about the dialogue during Kat vs Eva. I remember liking it more the first time around and it was nice for them to have these scenes to establish more of a frenemy vibe for them going forward. That still held up. But I found myself agreeing with you all about that dialogue. lol. Still, it was nice to have both of their POVs.   Second up was Silk Press Sheila vs the Duprees. And I was happy to get a brief spat with Dani in there. But the rest standouts for me was Anita and Martin. Haters can hate and given the tail end of the episode, I will agree to a fault, but Brandon has impressed and he was on fire on Monday and had great subtle work on Friday. And that subtle work made it all the better. Like I believe I said when I was watching...BC has a much better grip on his character and seems to be realizing what his tics are so has started to be able to know when to turn it up and when to dial it down. And for the most part (emphasis on most), he got that. Meanwhile, TT was giving fierceness, and I was here for every minute of it. Her reading SilkPress. Her being quip about it. Her 'BE STILL.' Ooooo she had a chokehold on me as Anita gave what I was expecting her to SilkPress. WORTH THE WAIT. I also loved Vernon's CHOOSE SILENCE. I wonder though if SilkPress will figure out Martin's condition from her observing Anita and Vernon with him.   And speaking of worth it...Oooo YES Nicole vs Ted was worth totally worth it. Oooooo I knew DD would nail it, and it was all so well done. The fight between the part of Nicole who is a therapist vs Nicole as a woman who wants to express how she feels. And being so angry. And how there would be moments when it would shoot out of her. And how she would restrain herself. But how she felt she should not be restrain. Just the levels of processing and layers. And DD played it all so well. I do wish Maurice gave just a little bit more, but overall, I thought he did a good job even if it was just Ted coming across as a deadbeat and not at all redeemable. And Kat being there for her mother was so beautiful.   Minority, but I love the montage though yes, it did run a little long. Given how the Duprees like to bond (and also as I mentioned from my own very recent family experiences), it did not seem out of place to me.     That said...let's see how the aftermath worked in today's episode. Overall. Cuz RC can be hit or miss. 
    • I wonder whose brilliant (

      Please register in order to view this content

      ) idea it was to do an almost complete rip-off of the "who killed Tom King"-storyline. That's some quality style writing right there.....  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy