Jump to content

Y&R: November 2013 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 427
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Dru was entertaining and I loved her. And I have affection for Devon and Lily because they are her off spring...her friendship with Shaorn even made me stop hating her so much. LOL. You know how some folks love the Abbots..and love any Abbot just because they are an Abbot. That's me and the Winters...love them! Well, I just wish they would get Lily away from Cane...and I learned to accept that CK was what we were going to get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Then you don't want anyone that is paired on Y&R to be paired . Adam and Chelsea, the lies. Victor and Nikki, the lifelong abuse. Micheal and Lauren, the affair. Victoria and Billy, years of lies and stupid choices. Nick and any woman he has ever been paired, cheating, lies, and abuse. Even the new couples are on their way to this type of drama. Point is that screwing up and getting forgiveness has always been a part of daytime drama.

Noah has a girlfriend...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They were already husband/wife.

With Devon and Hill, they are nothing to one another, and he should hate her. I would love to see an attraction build and Devon goes against the grain to be with her.

I don't have use for couples who are instantly together w/out going thru anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't care about any of those pairings you listed and Villy might be the worst of the bunch with Victoria looking like the biggest idiot alive constantly taking Billy. There's a difference between drama and a character just looking stupid for the sake of keeping them in a pairing. There's nothing romantic about a couple who hooks up after on half terrorizes the other.

And Noah and his girlfriend could easily breakup. They were pretty much just put together because no one else was available. It's not like they have a deep connection or have been through anything together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree that Villy is very played out...so is Chelsea and Adam. And I won't touch Victor and Nikki. However, Devon and Hilary is just starting. I am interested in where it will go.

Hilary did not terrorize Devon. She spent all her energy on Cane and Lily. Of course the story about Neil had to turn into a story about Cane and Lily. This time, it worked for the best because Hilary's damage to Devon is almost nil.

I agree...and is part of why I am not sold on Abby and Tyler. The writers aren't putting any effort into that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Don't even get me started on Tyler! A man who looks like that, but he won't even stand a chance when Abby's true love comes a calling in a leather jacket, attitude and spiked hair [oh, and did I mention he'll be white]! Victor will make their lives miserable and the audience will long for them to be together and hate Pesky Tyler for being in their way. PUKE!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Agreed. Tyler is definitely not a long term pairing for her. Victor respects him and likes him. He is just the kind of guy that Victor would want Abby with. There is no drama, and no story, there. I still think he was brought on for Lily. Do you see how differently the story was written when Lily was his love interest, and the air time that they got. as compared to Abby.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The person that Hilary was trying to hurt is Neil, who has forgiven her. I don't see why Devon would never find her worthy of being courted since that has occurred. Now Lily should forever be pissed because of the things that Hilary did to her personally. And, as a Devon fan, I am over him revolving his life around Lily. It's time he did his own thing regardless of her feelings on it. I actually think that would be good drama because Lily won't know what to do with that turn. She is used to Devon playing to the beat of her drum. Let her interfere in his love life and all the viewers accuse of her of having a thing for her brother.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

We'll just have to agree to disagree about Hilary and Devon because I don't see how it's okay to date someone who tried to destroy his sister's life.

On another note what the hell is going on with MTS? She's been awful lately! Today she looked awful too but she's been playing Nikki like Nikki is 2 minutes from a breakdown in every single scene no matter whats going on. Not even Sharon has been acting this fragile. And that whispery crap she keeps doing lately is the most grating thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I actually thought those scenes between CLB and Judith Chapman at the prison visiting room were quite good. Is it the best soap opera jailhouse scene between a mother and son? No, for me, that belongs to the scene between Lyla and Craig on ATWT in the 1980s (it is wrenching every time I see it). However, I appreciated the fact that Judith's performance was understated compared to what Gloria is known more. I like that Chapman resisted going melodramatic. The relationship between the two as mother and son was the highlight as opposed to Gloria rending her garments lamenting.

That series of scenes at the Athletic Club? I couldn't help but think wistfully of the private rooms at the Colonnade Room. I guess that scene of Nikki yelling that Dylan is her son was supposed to have maximum impact. Maybe it's just me but it didn't provide much emotional punch. When I think of all the various soaps and their scenes of maternal/paternal revelations, today's scene would not make my list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I guess RTPP looked worse because it followed Another World, but it's a shame they didn't give it more time especially considering how the shows that were put on following it fared.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Durkin was awful. The writing did her no favors, but she was all wrong for the part, lacking the mix of mystery, steeliness, sorrow and hesitancy that defined Victoria. I still have the awful memory of Adam lugging her around like a rag doll. She looked much more like one of the Blue Whale dancing extras than Victoria. And her voice... Maybe I am too harsh. With that said, Curtis didn't seem as bothered. I see from a fan review mentioning Barnabas & Company that Durkin was asked to return for Victoria's final episodes and declined as she had a Christmas trip to Europe with her husband planned and wasn't interested in just a few appearances.  I refuse to believe Victoria actually died during the Leviathan storyline. If Barnabas and Angelique could come back 8 times, she could come back a few.
    • It's a shame she only appeared in three episodes for the purpose of being written out - I thought she was quite good in the little we saw. I liked her vibe better than Durkin that never seemed to quite capture Victoria as a character.
    • He did a lot of romance novel covers, so that might've just been enough for them to get their panties in a twist.
    • Pre-TGIF, ABC most successful 1980s Friday 8 pm comedy I'd say was Webster. Full House wasn't a hit its first two seasons but it started showing growth in its third season which overlapped with the launch of TGIF. Funny thing is, Full House became a Top 10 show with the 1991/92 move to Tuesday.
    • Oakland Tribune, 14 July 1985   AW is another show with Schenkel at helm By Connie Passalacqua For the most part, dictators of South American banana republics enjoy better reputations than executive producers of daytime soap operas. Total authority is vested in these producers, who can kill off a character (thus firing an actor) with a stroke of a pen, or completely change life in his or her soap opera dominion (both in its fictional locale and backstage at the studio) on any kind of whim.  Most rule despotically, inspiring fear in their actors and writers. Which inevitably surfaces on the screen and subtracts from a show's quality. Then there's Stephen Schenkel who became executive producer of Another World last fall. He's been described by one of his actresses as "a teddy bear." He has noticeably improved the show, mostly because his natural warmth encourages backstage cohesiveness, and he believes in personally nurturing his staff and cast. 'I like to be supportive', he said.' I like to generate a certain amount of enthusiasm. I love actors and writers and technical people. And I like to laugh..  ' Schenkel said that most of the factors that have led to the shows improved ratings existed before he took over. There were well defined characters, outstanding writers and excellent production values, he explains. 'These things were in place but needed to be stimulated. There wasn't a lot of excitement. What really was missing was an adequate story. We added Gillian Spencer as a writer. (she also plays Daisy on All My Children), who's wonderful, and it just coalesced. The writers energy and commitment to the show began to give it an emotional intensity and some real passion within the characters." Schenkel, a former ABC programming executive who helped develop Ryan's Hope, is a strong believer in stressing romantic and comedy elements in soap operas. AW is also one of the only soaps with an established group of comic characters, including Wallingford (Brent Collins) and Lily Mason (Jackee , Harry). Schenkel raves about the talents of all his actors, and even has something good to say about the Brooklyn location of the shows studio, which most of his Manhattan-oriented staff loathe. I like the people here. I like to walk down the street and feel their energies, he said. He also violateda soap opera no-no, ' inviting actors and writers to the same party. "Everyone got to know one another, he said. And I didn't get any complaints about actors ' begging for story lines, he said. 
    • Since it's pride month.

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • National City Star-News, 5 May 1977 TV topics by Peter Blazi Lear’s ‘All that Glitters’—doesn’t The best thing that can be said about Norman Lear’s newest soap opera“All That Glitters” is that it comes on so late at night most people will miss it. Role reversal is supposed to be the big draw, with women the breadwinners, mainly executives of a huge conglomerate. The men either fuss with the housework or fidget at the office as secretaries to their bawdy bosses. A female fantasyland? I doubt it. While the role reversal idea has some possibilities, the show pushes too hard for laughs and winds up with raucous females and effete males. A confident, independent woman is indeed a sight to behold and attract, but femininity need not be sacrificed. Unlike Lear’s “Mary Hartman, Mary Hartman,” "Glitters” doesn’t, but you’ve got to give him credit for trying. Today’s experimental comedy is what tomorrow’s hits are made of. Better luck next time, Norman. (“All That Glitters” can be seen weekday evenings at 11 p.m. on Channel 6.) .
    • Actually Kim Zimmer got six weeks off to test the waters for pilot season in L.A. - she said later she went on many auditions and got one offer for a sitcom, but she would one of many in an ensemble. She turned it down, because it wasn't worth leaving Guiding Light for a supporting role on a sitcom. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy