Jump to content

AMC: Monday, May 13, 2013 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 146
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Personally I'd say no. The show reminds me of the same ABC AMC of the last 10 years which had moments of greatness, but couldn't completely pull things together. The execution of the show is just not good. I understand production was rushed, but wouldn't the writers be writing at the same time as the OLTL writing staff?

I also think they did a terrible job of assembling a cast that makes sense. There are lots of good characters, but so many gaps that should be filled. It makes it seem like many of them are floating around with no purpose. There also isn't a good enough balance between generations. Only time will tell, but so far I'm not impressed. I feel like I'm watching 4 different shows and these young actors (Petey, Cassandra, Celia, even Miranda and AJ) aren't strong enough to do everything. I need the adults to have actual lives.

I also HATE the writing for David so far. The show opens with us learning his third child is dead (which he's being blamed for) and then his fourth child he's being told is dead. This type of storyline, along with the endless back from the dead and baby switches is why soaps were dying. I just don't understand the purpose in launching with such an unoriginal story, and one so repetitive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think part of the reason that the show reminds you of ABC's AMC is because most of the script writers and script editor were writing the show then, sadly the ones on this show were the weakest writers of the ABC version. Today was the best episode thus far, and I think that was because the script writer was script writer on GL in the 80's and early 90s. I kind of wish the show had incorporated new blood (script writer wise/breakdown writer-wise) since it has done a world of good thus far over at OLTL.

I do agree with you so far on the logic of the cast. I don't understand why they didn't get Scott and Madison back at least.. since that would have helped fill in the 20/30 something gap, plus have them interact with Pete and then the writers could have placed Celia in the AJ/Miranda grouping. Plus, I'd love to see Brooke and Opal in scenes that don't revolve around Pete/Celia. For pete's sake, Brooke is running Chandler.. certainly they can involve her in some business stories, and I'd love to know what Opal is up to? I love that they have a coffee shop, but I think they could have built a Glamorama set as well (Opal revives it again) and would be a good place for the women to interact with one another.

I like how they are writing David so far, he is like a Greek character. Tragic with fleets of happiness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I awnt to see Scott again. Im shocked he hasnt been mentioned yet. When Adam was going on about how JR nearly destroyed Chandler, I was waiting to hear his fate and if he is still involved with the company or not. Im also shocked we havent heard about Stuart especially considering the his return was one of the last big shocks of the show's final days

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Also, am I the only one who thought they were hinting at something with Griffin and Dixie for a minute today?

I like Scott, I do, but him and Madison together were basically just nice people being nice. That's not necessarily very conducive to drama. I would like to see him visit, and I liked Cosgrove in the role but I am honestly not sure he is anything more than an actual, physical harbinger of death to soaps now so maybe we might want to recast.

I would definitely like Stuart. And Marian. And Liza, if Colby is back. Give me Jamie Luner, I liked her a lot in the role by the end. She sold a lot of visceral neuroses and self-loathing about her past that Marcy Walker hadn't been in touch with in years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah I agree with that. I feel they've gotten it all wrong with Petey and the show is missing that late 20s-30s age range so he feels isolated. What if viewers absolutely hate Petey and Celia? Then who does he interact with? And Jane is another character that seems so isolated, as is Bianca.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

the late 20s/30s crowd is a mess considering its barely non-existant. Such a shame as that tends to be my favorite age group. I feel the same on OLTL, but they at least seem to have more representation. I hope both are expanded on by the end of the year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Jane isn't supposed to be a showcased character at the moment. Which is fine. Her purpose will likely reveal itself in time.

Pete I like fine. Celia I go back and forth with, but I like her story, and I think their last day together was their best. I think bringing in Colby will really help. But I want to see more of Pete as Pete.

I just don't see a huge mess, myself. I see a show totally rebuilding itself almost from the ground up and doing a good job. OLTL had more to work with and a firmer foundation. But I think AMC, for its different tone and focus, is quite good. I want it to be different, and it feels fresh and clean. They both do, but AMC has the lighter tone and feels brighter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Nope, thought the exact same thing.... I saw some of you discussing a Dixie on meds storyline earlier.... I think Cady would do well with that... and Griffin could help her through that as a doctor, and a hot piece of ass to boot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Regarding the mobster storyline: The scripts, the cardroom set, and the writing for Joey -- are all terrible. They seem to be writing a realistic depiction of compulsive gambling as an addiction, showing that it pops into his head all the time -- it has become hardwired into his brain.  The APA (American Psychological Association) describes compulsive gambling as having a similar effect on the physical brain as drug and alcohol addiction. https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/07/how-gambling-affects-the-brain I think Jason Graham (Doug) is doing an adequate job playing Doug as a compulsive gambler, with the thoughts/urges coming into his head all the time, and being unable to stop. However, the cardroom set is awful and the mobster storyline is a bad cliché, so it's all so uninteresting to watch. I think Mr. Graham is doing the best he can with the crap they gave him to work with. If anyone reading or watching has a gambling issue, check out Gamblers Anonymous.  They have many types of meetings -- in-person, online, video, audio, etc.  They also have resources for friends/family of compulsive gamblers.
    • Today was painful (especially for Philip).  I still feel for Xander. He was clear he was happy sharing and working with Philip. It's just one more betrayal from someone he loved. Going back to last year when he found out about Victor and Fiona, then Alex and Philip. He forgave and tried. Then Philip went behind his back again. He's been walking on the edge for weeks. This is a man who was abused, neglected and has never had any therapy for his horrific past. He has zero coping skills because he's never learned them. I hate this but I refuse to hate Xander
    • Lucy Coe wasn't even this big of a whore. 
    • Kate being the one that Alex called was a nice surprise. The cut to her looking all sheek made me instantly get excited for her to get back into business mode. And the Jack reference from when she first came to town (on-screen) was inserted naturally which is always welcome. When they were talking about how much sex sells, I almost got the impression they were sizing each other up in a May/December type of way.  All the Philip stuff was gruesome. I'm happy the show isn't shying away from Xander's ugliness. I love them both, and it just makes me intrigued for the aftermath for it all to be taken seriously. I cheered when Philip spat out at that Sarah knew the truth. I'm on tenterhooks for their eventual confrontation. I was surprised that Kate wasn't a little vicious towards Sarah for Xander's obvious behavior, but maybe that's still to come. How wonderfully entangled is it that both Philip and Shawn/Steve stopped each other from getting the drug. Both equally at fault. Who/what will ultimately save Bo? And with everything going on, is a Salem where it's looking likely that EJ is about to own the hospital imminent?  
    • Oddly.. Chase and Steve seem to have both vanished from the canvas in December so the Estelle return loses impact when two of her kids stop appearing shortly after her return (and I assume TR leaves in early 1986 as well). The Steve recast doesn't work... but it's odd that he has a long scene with Teri with Cagney looking jealous.. when the majority of his time on the show previously was a relationship and engagement to Stephanie (who he barely has a scene with in the episodes I see). Your idea for Wendy/Bela/Stephanie sounds just like what Ryan's Hope did with Michael/Kim/Rae... and considering Louise Shaffer was playing Rae and Stephanie.. it would have been a lousy redux of a superior story on another soap (that had months of build-up) I think Quinn becoming assistant to Stephanie was Mayer/Braxton... but not 100 % sure. I don't know if Mayer/Braxton was setting up Sarah as a bad girl disguised as a good girl.. but the actress (Joyner) was playing the scenes in that manner.. and Tomlin wisely tapped into that when he took over.  
    • She’s such a caricature - which is a shame because I think the actress is capable of so much more.   I don’t know why Cady often feels like she has overcompensated in her performances. She already proved she can play much more than just Dixie Cooley during her first stint at ATWT (her best acting era). Her performances in various roles since then have been quite strange at times.
    • It feels like the show suddenly woke up today and remembered it was Sweeps month. Lots of action and forward momentum, including a delicious Nina/Carly fight. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • Where did I say that you weren't allowed to say anything? Personally I just find "disgusted" a very strong word, and not something I would use for such a trivial matter as a song contest. You obviously do, and that's your prerogative, just as it is mine to disagree.  
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy