Jump to content

Trayvon Martin Killing


Eric83

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 291
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Any jury worth their metal would never have convicted on Murder 2 or Manslaughter. The prosecution failed to prove intent to kill in either case and that's a HUGE part of those charges.

Man, I would have hated to be on that jury. That !@#$%^&*] should be awaiting sentencing right now for involuntary manslaughter, but because of the mainstream media's focus on the race card and under pressure from the DOJ, the prosecution threw a Hail Mary pass at Murder 2.

The system worked in this case, but it makes me sick to my stomach. I can't imagine how horrified and guilt-ridden I would have been at the moment I realized I couldn't vote for a conviction in this case.

If I was one of the jurors, I would have asked the judge if we could consider involuntary manslaughter or, at the very least, reckless endangerment.

Also, I really wish people would look at the facts. No one told Zimmerman NOT to follow that poor young man. He was told it wasn't necessary ("We don't need you to do that.") It was a SUGGESTION, a suggestion that lunatic should have followed. But he was never DIRECTED or ORDERED to not follow Trayvon Martin.

I hope Trayvon's family takes their lead from the Brown and Goldman families after OJ got away with killing Nicole and Ron. Take Zimmerman for everything he's worth in civil court.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The suggestion was all that was needed. If Zimmerman thought there was suspicious behavior going on, his job ended once he made that phone call and received instructions from the 911 operator, who has no authority to order Zimmerman to do anything. "We don't need you to do that" was more than sufficient because that meant we (the police) will take it from here. That is the way the night watchmen responsibility works. Zimmerman did not need to follow Trayvon and he certainly didn't need to gun him down. Had Zimmerman not been armed, the coward would have waited and let the police do their jobs (which would have been to tell him to take his fat ass home as they apologized to Trayvon for bothering him).

All Trayvon's family can do is put a strangle hold on Zimmerman's future earnings, which means he won't be signing any deals because the money will not belong to him! He will have to hand over every cent!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Racism is obviously a serious problem in this nation.

So is Racism Fatigue.

Clothing is not a reason to kill someone but it's natural to profile someone based on clothing because society conditions us to do that. A guy in a hoodie in a convenience store is likely going to be seen as a potential robber....fair or not

Characterizing someone as a thug/gang member because of a hoodie and sagging pants is generally racialism. Do I consider sagging pants proper dress? No, but I know there are some good kids who don't see it the way I do. That said, I don't get why someone would go on television claiming to fear for her child's life because the child wears hoodies. If you're in charge and you're that fearful then don't buy hoodies for your child. It can't be that complicated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Now there is 23 year old Crystal Scott who was involved in a minor fender bender with white Jonathan Abel. Abel got out of his car and tried to force his way into Ms. Scott's car and she shot him with her licensed firearm. Abel died on the spot. Ms. Scott has been indicted for murder and is awaiting trial.

http://uhurunews.com/story?resource_name=free-crystal-scott-defend-and-protect-the-african-woman

This woman better be acquitted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Another point that I think is relevant is that Zimmerman skated on a previous charged of fighting with a law enforcement office, had he been made to face it and likely convicted, he wouldn't have been able to own a gun, but his father was once a judge and those charges went away. It's just sad that the law didn't do it's job back then, otherwise Zimmerman wouldn't have been able to take a life.

Depends on rather or not the jury can see past racial and political bias, which it is a long shot in Texas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's another big issue that I wish would get more conversation. Zimmerman is a textbook example of someone with an escalating pattern of violence. Everything about this lunatic was a red flag: molesting his neighbor, assaulting a police officer, domestic violence, etc... it was just one thing after another. The fact that he ultimately killed someone was foreseeable and it's foreseeable that he will commit other crimes: assault, rape, murder, it's just a matter of time unless somebody stops him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Since laws differ from state to state. I don't see any value in comparing the judicial system in Texas to Florida's. What seems to be similar is that George Zimmerman and Crystal Scott were not initially charged. The evidence is different and there may be a witness or witnesses close enough to see what happened at the gas station.

http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/07/trayvon-martin-and-the-irony-of-american-justice/277782/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I completely agree. If anyone is a "thug" in this situation, it is Zimmerman. He is the one with the history of escalating violence as an adult. Now that he has gotten away with murder and is a social pariah, the stress will get worse and trigger.more violence. That same girlfriend defending him today will be one of his victims later on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

His brother's comments are so unbelievable. That's what I found so disturbing about that CNN article I posted. The whole, well, why wouldn't he want want his gun back? He's really going to need it now that there are even more people out to get him. blink.png Wonderful. The utter lack of empathy is appalling. Even if a person thinks that Zimmerman was right, the normal response is to be saddened and horrified by what happened. To see it as a terrible tragedy that should have been avoided. Not to shrug ones shoulders and talk about being armed again.

This lady lived my nightmare. There is so much road rage out there. I've always been worried that I will end up in some accident and some nut case will try to attack me afterward. I'm not someone who would ever carry a gun, but this is one of the few scenarios that makes me think it wouldn't be such a bad idea. At least most people would back away from the car, if they knew you could protect yourself. This guy sounds like he is either a psycho or on something. I'll be interested to see if it was a case of meth rage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I watched some of Anderson Cooper's interview with an anonymous juror. She said two of them wanted guilty on manslaughter and one on the murder charge. I would love to hear one of those women explain how they were "persuaded" to vote not guilty. I think this juror who is married to an attorney and very much sympathetic to George Zimmerman, probably worked in conjunction with the two already on her side to convince the other three. Maybe she even swayed them all.

She seemed to cry on cue but she didn't give the impression that she struggled at all in deciding that her George was a victim. She spoke with such certainty about that night that one would think she was there to witness the whole thing. I found it disturbing because I have no idea what happened except that Trayvon Martin was killed by George Zimmerman. Yet this woman recites the events as if there is not one doubt that George Zimmerman told the absolute truth. And she's probably going to write a book with her husband about her experience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She sounded so elitist talking about Rachel Jeantel. I would love to hear from those three jurors as well.

Rachel Jeantel was on Piers Morgan and I loved her. She seemed like a totally different person from the one that was on the stand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So apparently Juror B37 had a book deal but was quickly dropped after backlash. How this b-tch got a book deal on Monday when the verdict was read Saturday night? mellow.png Courtroom analysts said there was a juror taking down ALOT of notes. Juror B37's husband is also an attorney and may have connections to Mark O' Mara. Not to mention the Prosecution didn't want her on the jury but the defense dug their heels in and fought it and the judge eventually relented. Something in the milk ain't clean.

Twitter lit up both JurorB37 and Sharlene Martin who was supposed to represent JurorB37's book's asses.
Sharlene Martin rescinded on representing JurorB37...which was followed up by JurorB37 withdrawing from writing her book.
sharlene martin ‏@sharlenemarti n 3h
After careful consideration of the book project with Zimmerman #JurorB37 , I have decided to rescind my offer of representation.
sharlene martin
‏@sharlenemarti n
A statement from #JurorB37 . pic.twitter.com/3MRrqB50vb

BPRTMEkCIAANONw.jpg

I wonder if she can be brought up on perjury charges for lying to the judge about not talking to anyone about the case. It's pretty obvious at this point she must have had some contact with her husband during the trial. They have to look at both of their phone records (and their kids), emails, etc and investigate MOM while they're at it
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Last installment of 76 Felicia is horrified to arrive in Rosehill and discover that Charles has been in a coma since the night she left. She spends every moment at his bedside and, learning that a friend had a promise to God produce favorable results in a similar crisis, vows to give Eddie up forever in exchange for Charles’s recovery. Shortly after her prayer Felicia is told that Charles has rallied and has regained consciousness. Felicia now is determined to avoid Eddie and honor her promise. Bruce explains to Lynn that he must contact her parents or he and Van could be legally charged for allowing a minor child to live with them without parental consent. Bruce doubts Lynn’s assurance that her parents could care less, and is shocked when he discovers for himself that Lynn’s mother is as unfeeling as the girl has claimed. He informs a delighted Lynn that he plans to become her legal guardian.
    • I think that worked, but not as much by the late '80s, where I think they started getting things wrong with Mack.  I do respect Kevin Dobson, who did well when he was given the material he deserved (like the story with Jason).
    • 1976 Pt 2 The Organization has retained Michael Selby to represent their hit men. The district attorney recognizes his opponent as a noted courtroom specialist and knows he has his work cut out for him. Raising technicality after technicality, Selby quickly eliminates Lieutenant Price’s testimony implicating Bailey and Jerry’s testimony about Heather’s being assaulted. ‘Then, after cutting Julian’s testimony out as common knowledge, Selby goes straight to the heart of the  prosecution’s case. He demands that Carrie be produced now, sure that she’s been taken by the Organization. To Selby’s horror and shock, the doors open and Carrie walks in, and the courtroom explodes into pandemonium. As soon as the judge can restore order, Carrie is sworn in and begins her testimony. When court recesses for the day, Steve is confronted by another Organization man, Franklin, who questions him about why he took Carrie away. Steve tells him that Carrie was so frightened by the hit man lurking around that he saw his opportunity to be alone with her and “score.” Steve then adds that she wasn’t at all cooperative or friendly—she just cried all the  time—so he dumped her. He insists he has no idea how the police got her after that. Franklin accepts his story, and Steve learns that his next test is to testify to just what he’s told Franklin, omitting, of course, the reference to the hit man. Carrie insists upon a meeting with Steve and begs him not to go underground. He tells her he can’t back out now; you can’t go through life letting somebody  else do it all the time. Steve takes this opportunity to inform Lieutenant Price that he has to dump on Carrie on the witness stand for the Organization, but he can’t stop now. Julian, irate that Selby has blocked any reference to Nurse Fellowes’s disappearance and murder, as she was the only witness who could corroborate Carrie’s testimony, confronts Selby on this evasion. Selby | coldly tells Julian that there is no concrete connection between the nurses’ death and anything else that’s happened in this case and that to bring it into this trial would be a miscarriage of law. Julian, realizing  that it all falls on Carrie’s shoulders now, warns her that Selby will be out for blood; he has to make the court believe she’s lying.  The next day the district attorney introduces Carrie’s tape recorder. The tape, burned, as is the recorder, is barely audible. Selby calls for a mistrial, claiming that his clients’ reputations have been damaged enough. As the judge calls a recess: to consider the motion before the bench, the district attorney admits that he predicted everything Selby would do to this point, but had not guessed about this motion. If it works and there’s a new trial, Carrie is in far greater danger.  Steve now tells Castor that either he’s working for  the Organization as of now or he’s going to look elsewhere for a job. Castor offers the rainy weather as an excuse to wait before contacting “him,” because “the iron in him’Il be driving him crazy.” Realizing that this is a lead, Steve starts to write it down. When he is nearly caught, he warns himself that from now on  everything he learns will have to be kept in his head.  As soon as possible, he passes the “iron” clue along to Julian. The district attorney gains a respite when the judge  turns down the mistrial motion, but the tape has been disallowed also, ruled inadmissible. So it’s Selby’s turn to cross-examine Carrie. When he forces her to admit that she never actually saw the hit man, Selby turns to the jury and informs them that this proves she’s been lying. He then suggests this has all been a plot to boost the circulation of the newspaper she works for. Selby then goes to work on Carrie’s personal morals. Since she’s admitted that she and Steve spent three days in the apartment, alone together, he asks questions and makes insinuations designed to make the jury believe this was actually a sleazy affair. To Carrie’s horror, he then calls the landlady, Mrs. Wilson who testifies that that Steve and Carrie,registered as Mr. and Mrs. Clark, spent the three days in question drinking and partying with loud music and assorted other sounds coming from their rooms until late each night. Carrie rises to her feet and screams at Mrs. Wilson, ““You’re lying!” Steve is served with a subpena.  Joe Castor visits “the man”: Fred Harrington! Castor gives Harrington his report on Steve. He thinks Steve, with his computerlike mind, could be invaluable in helping the Organization work out money-exchange problems. Harrington tells Castor he wants the trial over as soon as possible, no matter how it goes. Those men are expendable; he has a bigger problem: Julian.
    • Given the weird fantasies/out of town barn trips she does for Reva/Kyle, I can't see it either. (Not to mention Kyle's obsessive talking to paintings, or Billy's nightmares.)
    • She would be great, but I of course am thinking of her in What's Love Got to Do with It.
    • Agreed that they had a home in the present tense of the first set of episodes.  But I was wondering if they lived in the mansion in the past when Sophia disappeared, and moved out when Santana got pregnant?  Or even when Danny was born.
    • According to the French Santa Barbara site the Andrades had a house in the early episodes.  I thought I remembered scenes in their home. The Andrade house
    • I always wondered if the Andrades lived at the Capwell Mansion?  Certainly they could've had a living room in their space or wherever they went on days off. But, I felt like it was never clear whether Santana visited Rosa when Kelly and Eden were young, or if she actually lived in the servant's quarters (one hopes modern developers have found a euphemism for that space).  I always imagined that Rosa, Santana, and Reuben lived with CC up until Channing was murdered, and then they found their own place because the kids were mostly over 18 (and Santana was pregnant). I like the idea of Rueban and CC being close until Santana got pregnant.  And then Reuben would've hated the adoption of Brandon.  Which would have meant he hated CC, and would've only continued to work for him to try to get info on whatever happened to his grandson. With regard Ava Lazar, having recently rewatched the pilot for the millionth time, I find her captivating to watch, but her line delivery is so dull. She looks amazing, and I just want her to be more quick witted.
    • I liked the original 4 family set up.  The families were all different from each other and were intertwined.  They should have been given equal airtime. I felt that Lockridges were perfectly cast with the exception of Laken.  She should have been quickly recast.   I liked all 4 of the actors cast as the Andrades and wish they would have been given better writing.  I really thought Ava Lazar (Santana) would have been one of the breakout stars if she had not been replaced. My only issue with the casting of the Perkins family was Robert Alan Browne as John and as much as I liked Mark Arnold he was the wrong actor to recast Joe Perkins. And of course it was ridiculous how badly they screwed up the casting of CC. The other Capwells were well cast.
    • This late 1976 stuff doesn't sound as bad as it has in other versions I've read (weekly recaps from Jon-Michael Reed and SOD synopses). I am surprised that there is a variation of Ian - Meg - Arlene - Tom playing out this late in the game, but it doesn't sound half bad. Ian's involvement with Beaver Ridge and how it impacts Rick and Cal's future also intrigued me  more than I expected. Even the Carrie - Betsy connection having Carrie watch Suzanne while Ben is visiting was a nice surprise. I feel like this all falls apart pretty quickly with the arrival of Mia Marriott, Michael Blake, and a slew of other half baked characters under Upton.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy