Jump to content

ATWT: P&G to release ATWT DVD Collection


dragonflies

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I think there has been a certain underestimation of whether soap fans will buy anything or not. I wouldn't be surprised if sales of that tribute book Primedia did for ATWT + the success of the So Long Springfield stuff was what made them decide to try this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 632
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

They could have also asked fans to choose their favorite episodes that they wanted included in the release. That would have made it even more special.

I have the tribute book. I forgot how much I paid for it. I think it was $10 bucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I actually wouldnt have chosen a Nuke one or anything Katie.

I would have picked the Connor/Lucinda one

Lily and Holden get married with Heather Rattray in the role just because the remote was so nicely done.

Lily marries Diego...even though I loathed the story that lead up to it.

The episode where all of Oakdale found out that Paul and Emily were lovers.

Those are just a few to begin with...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wonder how much it costs--I imagine,a nd get the feeling, getting the rights to 20 episodes is not all that expensive, especiallya s this company seems fairly small and start up. If that's true, and P&G doesn't get scared away (the way, say, Fox felt Shout Factory wasn't selling enough peyton Place DVDs, even though Shout said by their own standards it made a good profit, just not enough for Fox, and pulled the plug), I could see more. But I agree after a Best Of, they should start focusing on either stories (hard to do in 20 episodes without a lot of thought) or couples or maybe families. I won't pretend, even if I'd love it, releasing full episodes in boxes of 20 makes much sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wouldn't have chosen a whole lot after 1996...

What I meant was that with fan voting I think that we would get into more of the auto-voting and spamming and heavy organized voting, and that leans more in favor of more recent couples.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm not sure the number of P&G shows factored into whether or not they were saved---it took years for primetime shows to all be filmed in hopes of selling them into syndication. In 1956, there were very few shows doing it---that's why there's only 39 episodes of The Honeymooners.

In the grand scheme of things, I guess I understand including "groundbreaking" Luke...but those anniversary shows just grate my last nerve. I think instead I would have devoted a disk to "first meetings" or something...tell me the first Lily/Holden or Craig/Sierra scenes aren't GOLD.

If there was a "supercouple" who was pretty much forgotten, it was Craig and Sierra. I think I definitely would have rather seen some Steve/Betsy/Craig triangle than some random '79 episode focused on some hoochie Bob was dating at the time.

What I'm scared of is that these older episodes aren't going to translate well. I tried watching some early '80's stuff on youtube, and some of it definitely seems hokey.

It'll also be interesting to see the running time decline. In the '80's it was 40 minutes. At the end, it was 37. I wonder how long that '79 episode runs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would have done a disc devoted to '50s and '60s episodes. This could have also gotten some attention because of the episode where Walter Cronkite broke in about JFK.

The 1981 episode is...certainly one of a kind, mostly notable because poor Annie is dressed like she's selling Mary Kay. And there are some good John scenes. If they have more I'm surprised they didn't choose another one from that time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I already ordered one! Can't wait for it to arrive. I'm more excited to see the GL collection though because I've never seen much of that show in the classic era. Since ATWT was one of my favorites I know it's history well. Still very excited! I've actually never really seen anything from the 90s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Right. Literally for decades, soaps mesmerized their audiences with tales of romance, family conflict, class struggles, and recognizable interpersonal-relationship sagas. We didn't need relentless, heavy violence. We didn't need clones, mad scientists, extra-terrestrials and demon possessions. We didn't need gaggles of plastic himbos and bimbos pushing beloved vets off-screen. We only needed to see people whom we cared about, and the intelligent, moving progression of their lives. Flashy sets, gaudy gimmicks, and high-falutin' hairdos be damned. The characters and the words were important.
    • Absolutely! Brad should've simply moved on from Lunacy. There's no point of freeing her, if you're not going to at least make an attempt at redemption or incorporating her into the fold. It happened with Quinn, who committed quite a few felonies before become the Forrester Matriarch.  Heck, keep Lunacy in prison and have Poppy/Finn discover that she gave birth to twins - 'Sunny' could've come on with a clean slate and still had Sheila/Finn and all the other drama. It certainly couldn't have been worse than what we've witnessed with the destruction of $B.    
    • I would enjoy it if Swan popped up on BTG as an old one time friend/mentor of Anita’s for a cameo. This is just

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I had totally forgotten that Courtney story. I see Burton was already phoning it in by that point.
    • omg I completely missed that, but now when I see it typed here in your post, it's obvious icky cringe. So now I just checked and Tomas said that -- on May 27 that he likes the author Carl Ivati.  He said it with sort of an accent, so I didn't catch the stupid joke or think about the spelling.   I remember when that aired, that I actually said to myself at the time, "I wonder if that's a Latin American author, and I will have to google him later." And now I see your post, and I see. Well that's cringe, and I feel stupid to have fallen for it.

      Please register in order to view this content

         
    • There's a lot you don't need if you have the writing.  You don't even need large casts!  You could make do with a cast of 12-18 actors if the writing is there.
    • Thank you. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with sleeping around if your spouse actually knows about it. She’s just a cheating slut.
    • OMG...Robert Mandan! And Donna Mills is a child. I keep hoping for more of early Ross/Vanessa.
    • I get your point, but I also know that if the roles were reversed -- if a man were screwing around on a woman this way -- everyone would be all "All with his head!" When I say Vanessa needs therapy, I'm actually being kind, because I could begin and end with the fact that she's a cheating slut.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy