Jump to content

DAYS: From the Archives: Bill Bell discusses plans for 1970


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Here's a treat for all the "Days" history fans: A letter from Bill Bell to Betty Corday detailing plans for the show in 1970. In the letter, Bill asks Betty if he can perhaps write a "mixed marriage/love affair" storyline. Although wanting to write the story in 1970, that would not happen on the show until Valerie Grant arrived in Salem in the fall of 1975. Also, there is the first-ever mention of Bill Horton's as-yet-unnamed cellmate (who would eventually become the long-running character of Doug Williams). Those are just a few of the tidbits in the 4-page letter. Enjoy!!

http://www.jason47.com/days/billbellletter.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 24
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Heather North played Sandy Horton from 67-72. However, her time on the show is barely referenced in synopses, so I have no clue if those stories occurred or not, unfortunately.

As for Craig, he never did return. And as we know, Marie was never paired with "Bill's cellmate."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Craig never returned after leaving the show in February 1967.

Sandy's chemistry teacher, Ruth Parker (played by Maura McGiveney), appeared for just a few episodes, so her romance with Tommy never happened.

Sandy never had too much to do, she wasn't a contract character, and based on her monthly episode appearances, she was never featured much more than once a week. They featured Sandy heavily from November 1969 to January 1970, but she pretty much disappeared after that. Here's Sandy's monthly totals:

Heather North (Sandy Horton)

12/67: 5

1/68: 1

4/68: 1

5/68: 4

6/68: 4

7/68: 9

8/68: 4

9/68: 2

10/68: 5

11/68: 8

12/68: 5

1/69: 11

2/69: 3

3/69: 5

4/69: 2

5/69: 5

6/69: 5

7/69: 6

8/69: 3

9/69: 5

10/69: 4

11/69: 9

12/69: 9

1/70: 10

2/70: 5

3/70: 2

5/70: 1

6/70: 3

8/70: 3

9/70: 3

10/70: 2

11/70: 2

12/70: 1

1/71: 1

4/71: 1

5/71: 1

12/71: 1

1/72: 1

5/72: 2

6/72: 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I always liked Heather North, I thought she was very cute and a pretty good actress for her age. A coworker who was watching then has said the same thing. I've seen her in some old tv episodes from the same time period, and she was in a Disney movie with Kurt Russell around that time too. But Jason's right, Sandy never really had a story while she played the role. I think she was mainly getting acquainted with the Hortons since she had been raised away from them (since Tommy had been presumed dead through most of her childhood).

Oh, and Heather got a baby out of it too! I have an old magazine that has a story and photos about the christening of the son she & Wes Kenney had. Bill & Susan Hayes were the godparents, and Suzanne Rogers attended too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It is interesting in comparing DAYS of the 60s/70s to the 80s/90s. Very different, yet they each had their very popular periods. It's too bad there wasn't more of an effort to include aspects from the 70s, apart from random returns. Mickey and Alice are gone. Marie is a non-entity (such a waste) and Bill has been a non-entity since 1994/1995, apart from a LOT of references. They could even resurrect Tommy, but I feel that time long passed. It's really a shame the Hortons aren't used as the anchors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Fascinating insight.

i wonder how much control Bell had and how much Corday and NBC could influence story? eg the 'mixed marriage' story he proposed never came to pass.Was this Bell's decision or was pressure brought to bear?

Regards Marie,did Bell know for sure that Maree Cheatham was willing to return or was he prepared to recast? As it turned out Marie was used very little until dropped in 73.

Sandy was a wasted character (along with Steve).With a little tweaking,Sandy could have been the Marlena character which would have kept the Hortons front and center for many years.

Interesting that Bell commented on wanting to see character onscreen before creating story,which shows he was quite flexible about plot lines at some level.

Hopefully Jason has more treasures like this to share.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Bill Bell's letter and now Betty Corday's response ... fascinating. (Thanks, Jason!) Two things I find particularly interesting about Corday's letter: She says that Julie "knows" she is more physically attractive than Susan. Do you think that's an indication of Julie's self-centeredness, or is it a reflection of Corday's (and presumably, the viewing public's) opinion that Susan Seaforth was more beautiful than Denise Alexander? (Personally, I think both women were -- and are -- gorgeous.) Also, Corday's contention that viewers won't be interested in the Marie-as-nun story due in part to a diminishment of public interest in defecting nuns is somewhat ironic, since the Sister Marie-Alex-Neil story was played to great effect almost 15 years later, when public interest would have been even lower.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Add me to the group of people who think that Brandon has improved. He has. There's no doubt about it. Especially compared to the beginning. And he's improving in a way that... it makes me think that he realizes what the issues are and is addressing them. Of course, he's no master of acting at this point... but I don't cringe as much as I did. And I've seen people in Bold... I won't even have to name names, because everyone knows who they are... who are becoming even worse than what they were offering in the first place. So... I'm happy that in BTG... people are actually blossoming and improving. It surely means that the atmosphere is creative and nurturing talent.  BUT and it's a big butt... his relationship with his husband is still so lacking and ghastly. I am craving to see more action from these guys. I want to see Smitty's character. If he has any. 
    • Thank you. You guys come to the rescue again. I'll take a look later.   Thank you for the info!!! Now I find myself less confused. You and @DRW50 are amazing.
    • I know Passions used this trope with Ethan and Sam to drag out the paternity, but GH seems to speed through certain stories while dragging others.
    • For any other soap, I think I’d agree, but GH, I don’t know

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Agreed, that there was some strange choices in the episode, especially at the end, but overall, that was some great drama that opens up the potential for so much future storyline. Kat vs. Eva having the most potential, especially over Tomas. I have mixed feelings about Martin/BC though. I thought he did pretty well in scenes with Smitty/MM, but the scenes of him confronting Leslie and of him throwing the books were bad lol she acted circles around him.  It’s similar to what Harding Lemay said about George Reinholt at AW; he could be brilliant in one scene, but then mediocre in the next. 
    • I know some of y'all really like Brooke Kerr, and so I've tried to give her a shot, despite her frequent flat line readings and distracted "did I leave the front door unlocked?" facial expressions. But lord, she is so bad at playing a tough-talking badass that I was actually rooting for Brad today to spill the beans to Drew. 
    • Googling does tend to ruin it.  For those of us who were teens in the late 1970s and early 1980s, you can't imagine how much fun it was to watch the show in the afternoons.  (It came on right after school.)  There weren't any "spoilers" at the time.  We would always try to anticipate how each crime and each mystery would be resolved, and we were ALWAYS wrong, because the stories are filled with so many weird twists and turns.   The head writer (Henry Slesar) and his dialogue writer (Steve Lehrman) invariably toss genuine clues directly into your face in the most unlikely ways, but then they provide a host of "red herrings" to completely confuse you and send you off on the wrong path.  Once the story reaches its conclusion, all you can think is Why didn't I figure that out weeks ago?  lol
    • Does the vault have the original scene and not the short flashback?
    • I appreciate that you are using AI with the knowledge of it's limitations. Some posters take everything it produces as fact.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy