Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Nothing. I tend to stay out of this thread because for months now it has come across to me as people hoping PP would fail, and now taking delight that they seem to have done so. I will never understand it. Here you have this company that wanted to save the show, and everyone seems to resent that and was rooting against them from day one. And these are the soap fans ! I would hate to see what soap haters would say. But this goes all the way back to the prequel thread when the very same naysayers mocked and belittled the soap fans who were willing to protest, write, contact people, harass, stalk, do anything to keep the soap alive. There seems to be more fun to be had at an ongoing wake than there would be at a saved soap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

There is really no reason to hate PP they tried regardless if some see it or not and they are still trying. This is more than AMC/OLTL to them this is their online network which the soaps are a small part of. The story got leaked I don't know if we would have been privy to any of this information if not for that. I think PP didn't realize that soap fans want to know every detail and they aren't use to that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You can't fault people from having doubts from the beginning things sounded shaky. For me it wasn't about wanting to see PP fail it was realistic projections on how was this going to work in the way that they described. There is nothing wrong with being skeptical a wise man should question what is brought forth to him instead of blindly accepting it as the truth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree. From the beginning, their plan sounded unworkable. I think down the road, many shows will be viewed from the Internet instead of having to find it on a broadcast channel and have enough viewers to sustain themselves (with advertising most likely), but I don't think we're quite there yet. I do think PP's idea will be workable in the future, but again, viewing shows on the Internet is not quite there yet, at least enough of an audience to sustain shows that are costing millions. A lot of people felt they were biting off more than they could chew and trying to hold onto a model that wasn't really viable anymore and putting it on a platform that wasn't quite ready, and I think those worries are showing themselves to be sadly true. Plus, I don't think the company was quite as ready to take on this project as they maybe thought they were. If only they had started smaller, they wouldn't be needing so much money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, but there's skeptical, and then there's cynical, and it's been mostly the latter around here. I will never understand the backlash PP got straight out of the gate in this thread. The absolutely unheard of notion that a young production company would make the effort to continue not one but two beloved cancelled soap operas, and fans are at their computers hocking up spit for the eyes of Frank and Kwatinetz. Seems like such backward thinking to me. The extraordinary task at hand is obvious, I have no doubt that they've been dancing for their lives trying to get this thing off the ground. And think about it, if successful, their efforts to come to terms with the unions will be historically significant in the industry. This project has put PP's name in people's mouths. The idea that this is all a conspiracy and they'd willingly put their name on the line to be known by the industry and the public as the production company that failed at saving the soaps is absurd. They don't have the time nor the money for such foolishness. Problem is, everyone wants to know everything and they want to know it now and they get mad and start making up their own news and theories when they aren't getting anything factual.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If it was actually skepticism, I'd be prone to agree with you.

Oh, please. Put that away. You hardly qualify to what chyti is talking about.

That's exactly the problem. Somewhere along the line, people began to feel entitled to information at every turn regarding business decisions that absolutely DO NOT INVOLVE THEM.

No, it wouldn't have been, dear. I can see it now. The spin-off concept would be used as fodder to claim that Prospect Park was trying to get rid of Susan Lucci (or whichever entity people enjoyed that somehow didn't make it into the spin-off). Much like ABC moving All My Children from NYC to LA was cited as a way to get rid of David Canary and the vets. People will see a conspiracy no matter how plain the subject may be.

Absolute yum!! wub.png

I know, right? It's more commendable to HATE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I freely admit to cynicism. Personally I turned against PP when Deadline accused SuLu of trying to gouge them. I believe that story was leaked to Deadline in the effort to put pressure on Lucci to sign and I believe it was done with PP's knowledge and consent. If it turns out I'm wrong about that then so be it. I've seen nothing from PP that has given me any reason to support their taking over my soap. Everything I've seen has told me that they are just a watered down version of ABC. I won't support that.

Look at your signature before you start talking about hate, hypocrite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think there was understandable cynicism, but a lot of the time, especially early on, it veered more towards "oh look at those crazy/stupid fans" and "they sure give us a bad name," as a default. Even putting out a thank you ad for OLTL and AMC turned into stupid soap fans who were going to be conned out of their money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What? My signature?! Oh, honey, the two things have nothing to do with each other. I think you're confused. The hypocrisy is coming from you.

For your sake, I hope so. Nothing's worse than being left with a... "WTF?!" feeling at the conclusion of a finale. :lol: I speak from recent experience. ;)

THAT's what I'm saying. It seemed as if anyone (soap fan, actor, production company alike) did something or said something in favor or in an effort to prolong their shows, they were met with being called crazy, pathetic fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I could not care less that Oprah Winfrey's inbox was bombarded with pleas. What am I, her mother? I got my own inbox to worry about. Maybe she should have saved us all from her craptacular and failing ego network and invested in Prospect Park. Everyone would have been happy and she could have maybe put on a program someone actually wants to watch.

I was always optimistic about PP because there is no percentage in being pessimistic. As they say in the gambling world, where's the vig in that? All my weeks of cautious optimism gave me all those weeks of happy hope the shows might live another day. Naive perhaps, but online is the future and the soaps have a better shot there than garnering 1.0s on some quality-free network devoted to perky chat crap and cooking shows. As I posted today in the primetime forum "Arrested Development" is heading to Netflix as an original program. It's the same idea as this one. Netflix has a built in subscriber base and more money, but the logic is still the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Has anyone ever posted January and February 1974? I can't find them in the 'Look Back to 75' thread. Thanks.
    • Did January and February 1974 DSN ever get posted? I can't seem to find it in this thread.
    • I agree. Especially after SilkPress got back to her apartment and started to mock Nicole. Her dislike for Nicole and seeing her as a threat to her getting Teddy Bear is growing worse. So I could see her pulling a kidnapping on Nicole at some point. If anything she was going there to poke the bear and got pressed (pun unintended) when the bear gathered her.   Completely understandable. 
    • Beyond The Underwear Oops I mean Gates!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I swear this entire time I thought Roman knew about the Phillip/Vivian letter lol.  I do like how mature Roman/Kate are as a couple.  It makes me sad the new writers never got a chance to write for John/Marlena. I agree with @AbcNbc247 that the Felicity stuff is a bit after school special-y.  I am pretty sure that (most) of the viewing audience is aware that a grown man should not be shouting at any teenage girl especially one with disabilities.  Just let Xander apologize and move on. Linsey Godfrey was in her Sarah baby voice mode today and it irritates me to no end.   I know it's a cutesy thing her and Xander do but it's annoying. Bringing Kevin back is strange, but I do like the use of history.  I do think Rex probably could have been used instead, but whatever.  I don't care about Rex much either lol.
    • I mean over the past decades. But I do agree that in recent years now, the writing is not working for them as well as it used to then. It's same old, same old...which is what made the Damian storyline refreshing. At least for me.   
    • Did Denise give any interviews where she talked about her first few years on GH... '73-75? I wonder if she had any regrets leaving Days for GH, as from what I've read, the show was in the dumps writing-wise, so am thinking she didn't have great story? Any Leslie story highlights I've seen always start with '76, after Gloria Monty took charge.
    • I know! It's like second verse, here we go again!  Agreed. Certainly there was concern maybe even fear at the highest levels for the very good reason that what they had was so economically successful, so of course this risk was scary but if anyone was brave she was. Yes, he was. I have seen her associated with getting it on the air one other place but no details nor official title. Not the writer or creator so it made me wonder if she functioned as a kind of uncredited ad hoc producer, but then maybe she just supported it. At any rate that is nothing but supposition on my part. No data! Yes, not a surprise anymore but still so frustrating! On one hand I am appreciative that she is included in this book, but scholarship where are you?!
    • that wasnt her point. She wanted to further demonize Ted; that was the main focus of their talk. She wants to ensure that Nicole leaves him so that he's free and single to be with her. At this point, I dont think she really cares what Nicole thinks of her; she just wants her out of the way Eva is Nicole's stepdaughter and is a Dupree by association. If Nicole takes Ted back then its reasonable that she would accept his daughter and i that happens, Eva will have welcomed to their country club, be invited to their parties, have access to their resources, etc....much like Andre whom also isnt a blood Dupree but is accepted by them via Nicole. Eva got what she got from Anita bc of Hayley. I think its important to remember that context bc they just dealt with an interloper that infiltrated their ranks and hurt her daughter in the worse way. Now you have another unfortunate girl positioned to do the same to her other daughter. The feelings are still too fresh and she doesnt want Eva to get the idea that she would ever be allowed the opportunity to play them again
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy