Jump to content

All My Children Tribute Thread


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

What I think is so nuts about the summer of Silver, Erica, and Jenny modeling in New York was how much of the plot was directly lifted from classic films.  The iconic images of Erica modeling are directly influenced by images of Audrey Hepburn in Funny Face

Please register in order to view this content

Silver's story is obviously cribbed from All about Eve

Down These Mean Streets: All About Eve (1950)

and there are shades of A Place in the Sun in Jenny's story, and the shady photog who tried to take topless pics was taken directly from the movie Fame.

Copying classic films was a "thing"  on soaps at the time, and at ABC in particular, but I wonder if today's audience would tolerate such direct plagiarism?

Edited by j swift
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 10.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Hmmm... the Hollywood "Golden Era" classics that "AMC" decided to emulate in my opinion actually complimented those storylines - given that most of them orbited around Erica's character, whom if I recall LOVED celebrity and yearned to be in the movies. But not in a way that "GL"'s Nola Reardon, or "LOVING"'s Ava Rescott fantasized. For Erica, her life was the movies? But going back to your original question, as soaps advanced into the 90's, I feel like each show still tried to emulate pop culture in a sense but maybe in the vein of what was popular and not a total crib - say a movie like "Basic Instinct" became the rage - you almost saw some kind of film noir/diabolical plot on "Y&R"; or wasn't the affair Duke had on Anna with Olivia on "GH" based on the popularity of "Fatal Attraction"? I do remember one homage, was given the popularity of "The Fabulous Baker Boys" Leanna on "Y&R" got on top of a piano and crooned like she was Michelle Pfeiffer. And who could forget "Ryan's Hope" attempt at "King Kong" with an escaped gorilla coming for antagonist Delia Reid Ryan Coleridge :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

For me, the difference is that Nola, Ava, and later Sara on Sunset Beach, fantasized about "Old Hollywood", whereas these plots were directly cribbed from movies, not a one episode lark.

I actually think the less iconic but more amusing example was when Siobhan had a "Jaws" sighting in Montauk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As @Kane @Khan and @amybrickwallace were recently discussing on the Loving thread, the look of one of Tricia's weddings on Loving was directly lifted from the Greta Garbo movie Camille.
I don't know how the timing matches with the Summer of Silver but clearly explicit direct visual references to old movies was a thing in 80s ABC soaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Another example: Karen Wolek's descent into prostitution on OLTL was inspired by Luis Bunuel's 1967 film, "Belle de Jour."

Someone (forget who) once said that there are only so many plots, and that everything written was inspired by something else.  So, you know, it doesn't surprise me that soap scribes have cribbed from books, movies, other TV shows, etc., or that they will continue to do so so long as there's a God in Heaven.  All's I ask is that they don't bore the audience.

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And they were also plenty explicit, much later, that the Al/Michael/Marcie plot on OLTL - shudder - was directly lifted out of Heaven Can Wait.

What you said is exactly right but I think what is interesting about what j swift pointed out and the Tricia wedding is that it is not so much plot than visual references. 
Movie directors love to do that and reference each other; it is inexistent in soaps today as it requires some preparation and artistry that is not available to soap directors who work industrially.
It is interesting that they invested the time and money for obscure references back then. I wonder how many directors inserted "shot compositions" meant to mimic something in a more famous piece and that went right over everyone's head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

True.  If I were a filmmaker today, I'd be doing sort of the opposite, inserting all sorts of soaps references into my work.

Interviewer: "That sequence in the hall of mirrors was fantastic.  Was that a direct reference to 'The Lady from Shanghai'?"

Me: "No, that was inspired by Roger Thorpe chasing Rita through the hall of mirrors on 'Guiding Light'."

Interviewer: "Really?  You got your inspiration from a soap opera?"

Me: "Hey, we can't ALL be Hitchcock fans!"

Edited by Khan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think they’re desperately trying to cover his awful tattoos. But anyway them being unable to style short kings properly has been a major pet peeve of mine for a while now.  I honestly don’t understand what some people expect from actors to even begin considering them for recognition. Let’s be real—awards mostly mean that an actor is respected by their peers and has some level of cultural relevance. Actual judgment on the acting itself? That’s often secondary—highly subjective and shaped by the times. I completely agree on both points. If you’re an actor or a dancer you shouldn’t get any tattoos (sorry not sorry). Tomas’ tattoos are ugly too. And regarding the couples- you’re completely right. These writers are unable to write romance.   Further comments: - Kat cannot be this dumb to keep tampering with evidence over and over again. And I’m officially not a fan of the actress—every time she’s in a scene with Leslie, she doesn’t seem intimidated at all. She plays it like comic relief, which is just too much, especially when paired with Leslie’s histrionics and over-the-top antics. Leslie is older, dangerous, and has literally been portrayed as homicidal—Kat should be at least a little scared. • I also didn’t like Kat playing damsel in distress with the hotel manager. It gave off the same weird energy as Dani with the cop. I would’ve much preferred the version Paul Raven suggested, with her sneaking in through housekeeping. • And yes, Dani again accused Hayley of faking the pregnancy—this time even specifying she might be using a pillow under her shirt. (No fake miscarriage being mentioned) I stand by my take: this is ridiculous writing. No one in the real world—except us, the chronically online soap watchers—would even think of such a conspiracy theory. Haley is no Beyoncé. • What in the world was Chelsea wearing in her hair the other day? And this whole thing with Madison is beyond cringe. Chelsea’s coming off as needy and toxic—basically like every other Dupree. • I’m glad the casino storyline is moving forward, but it’s still boring as hell. Honestly, I’d be so here for a plot twist where Vanessa and Doug take Joey out. • The direction and editing lately have been rough. Abrupt cuts, weird pacing… something just feels off overall. There’s a strange uneasiness to how it’s all coming together. • And finally: Tomas is too much of a saint. Where are the messy sluts when you need them? (Vanessa doesn’t count.)
    • I was watching some August 1987 episodes and they brought back so many memories. I had some thoughts: Lisa and Jamie were so dull. Lisa was such a nothing character. It boggles my mind that so much story was centered around her in such a short amount of time. Joanna Going is a talented actress, but the material was just not there.  It was so good to see Wallingford and Mitch again. I know there was talk about Felicia a while back, but these episodes reminded me how integral Felicia was for the show.  Sally Spencer was done so dirty. She is turning in superb performances in an icky storyline. I wish she had stuck around longer. She has chemistry with everyone. The McKinnons should have lasted longer. Spencer had some strong stuff with Stephen Schnetzer and Mary Alexander. AW waster such a talented actress by getting rid of her. Justice for Cheryl too. I also missed Ed Fry when he left. Sandra Ferguson was a star from the moment she came on. She was charismatic and just popped. She had immediate chemistry with RKK and blended in well with Wyndham and Watson. I'd forgotten about the teenage Matthew.  I have no memory of Peggy Lazarus. She must not have lasted long. Was the original plan for John that he was going to turn out to be the twins' real father?      
    • If the new and improved copies that @rsclassicfanforever has uploaded can be manually moved into the "by month, by year" folders, that would be awesome. I personally don't think it's necessary to keep the older versions (which either have Dutch subtitles hard coded on them, or are lesser in picture quality). That's a lot of valuable drive space that could be cleared. Just my view but can appreciate others may feel differently. The structure had been by month by year previously, so I think it would be easier to conform to that, where so much prior work to get it to that format has already been done. Hopefully you can "drag and drop" so the new copies are in the right month/year? Re Clips, I never look at them now we pretty much have the episodes in full. Appreciate others may use, however. Thanks for all your hard work here @BoldRestless!
    • Oh yes defintely, Josh Griffith repeats and repeats the same storylines.
    • Isnt’t this storyline similar to the Cameron Kirsten situation though? Sharon thought she killed him. He ended up being alive and Sharon was being tormented with thinking she was seeing his face everywhere and that’s how we got that iconic scene with her and Nikki in the sewers.   I understand in Mariah’s case this is different circumstances but it does seem like a play on that whole thing. Maybe I’m wrong. I just wish if they were going to make any character follow in Sharon’s foot steps it would be Faith. Mariah wasn’t even raised by her, and her personality is different. I would expect her to take a different path. I understand I could be completely jumping ahead because the storyline hasn’t even played out yet but we’ll see. 
    • Thanks again @Paul Raven Monica was completely without redeeming qualities at this point. I always found the whole Monica = Carly narrative regressive, as I don't think shows comparing characters so heavily is ever a great idea, but she's actually worse than Carly was. Was it the Pollocks who had Leslie have a miscarriage?  Giving her a child, especially by rape, was not a good idea, but a part of me wishes they'd committed to it just to see what story it might have had in later years.
    • @janea4old Your detailed explanation and delving into the psychology and motivations is no doubt the opposite of what we will see onscreeen. As @ranger1rg stated we will get a few scenes and some sketchy explanations. Like the adoption of Aria, most of it will take place off screen.
    • I'm suddenly fearful that DAYS is going to pull a Flowers-for-Algernon stunt and Bo's progress will be reversed.  While @te. is stuck on Abe's tiny bedroom, I can't stop thinking of the size of Bo's huge hospital room.
    • Okay, why are Paulina and Abe sleeping like that?!  I'd take a screen grab if I wasn't lazy, but come on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy