Jump to content

AMC and OLTL Canceled!


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Ugh, I never commented on how Barbara made a point to smush it in Susan's face that she didn't get an Emmy nom. I just do no like that woman.

DeeeDee, that pic of Vonetta is gorgeous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Actually, SL got ethnic with her, telling her to "back that muthafuckin' train up," and that she was making money for the network long before Barbara ho'ed her tired, lisping ass off the "Today" show on NBC.

(I'm just kidding. But wouldn't it have been awesome if she had?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It really would have been something.

Barbara was so weird in that interview, it's like she hates Lucci, but likes her at the same time. Respect and revulsion. Just such an odd contradiction to watch.

Lucci was her usual classy self. She saved her street language for Joy Behar's HLN show...

Behar: So you're pissed?

Lucci: Yes!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wow, I didn't see this before. It's an interview with John Yorke, who is the BBC's Controller of Continuing Drama, and was the EP of the much lauded and highly rated 2000-2002 era of EastEnders. Anyway, AMC/OLTL get mentioned, and he talks about basic differences between the UK and US soap industry.

http://blogs.bbcamerica.com/anglophenia/2011/05/10/bbc-exec-john-yorke-responds-to-u-s-daytime-soap-cancellations/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think it's really possible over here, as I suspect the networks are slowly dying period, but in 5-10 years down the line that's what I'd do, basically; adopt the British formula and run a soap three to four days a week, a la Idol as well, and run it between 5-7 PM at night for either 30 or 60 minutes. Make the final day of the week - either Thursday or Sunday - the biggest 'event' day of the week. And it's still early enough that it still retains some 'feel' of daytime, and you can perhaps run ancillary web content on some weekday or weekend mornings.

Crazy, but a thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Interesting interview with John Yorke. I'm glad that he pointed out that even with the advantages of prime time programming, lack of dependence on ad revenue, and government funding that the UK soap audience has also been declining. He acknowledges that the role that competitive programming has taken its toll on the U.K. soaps also. I actually don't think that all the UK soaps are sufficiently diverse, but they have done a better job than the U.S. soaps. Quality-wise I think that they have their fair share of crap. However, it is good to see Yorke speaking forthrightly about the challenges ahead for the UK soaps. I think that EE is doing a great job with finding young talent through its Web series and IPlayer is excellent. If this keeps up, they might be able to stave off their audience decline longer than the U.S. soaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The UK soaps seemed to have stopped the decline in the last few years. While that may just be a calm before the storm, I do think that it shows these programs can still have a sizable audience if enough effort is made. I am not a fan of what has been done to Corrie or Emmerdale in the last few years (or longer) but it shows that you can have success when the network makes an investment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, the ratings have stabilized or in some cases gone up for the UK soaps. Even with added competition and more ways to watch them, EastEnders or Corrie are still at or near the top of the weekly BARB ratings.

But these shows tend to be the cornerstone of BBC or ITV's schedule, thus more investment and pressure is put into them to succeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

+1

IMO, it's very sad that for a genre that was started in the US, OTHER COUNTRIES (Mexico, Argentina, Brazil, Spain, UK, Germany, Czech Republic, Japan, South Korea, China & Australia) all have THRIVING soap operas, while here in the US , we're in the death throws of it.

I've watched almost every US based soap opera that was on air from the time that I was a child, being watched by my grandmother until I was in my early 20's. I ONLY got back into watching soaps, because I read that ATWT had written a storyline that had Luke Grimaldi Synder, coming out of the closet. Then, somehow I found out about a similar storyline on a UK based soap called, Hollyoaks with their John-Paul McQueen character. I know that US based soaps want to provide "fantasy", but on the other soaps, especially the UK based ones, IMO are more successful in providing entertaining serial drama that doesn't make it seem like they're dumbing down their audience. I don't see or feel that misyogeny is the driving force of those soaps. It's not the norm that female characters are having 2, 3, and/or 4 children out of wedlock by different men. It's not the norm to have female characters falling in love with their rapists/abusers. It isn't the norm to have "secret twins" being discovered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I'm not sure it's as unpopular as you think.  I just think the show knew they were in a bind, and needed a proven couple for the viewers to invest in. Trying to reunite Vanessa and Ross had just failed in 87. I don't think Ed and Holly's affair was well received, as Simon and Garrett had a brother/sister chemistry. Enter Billy and Vanessa, who give you history and an out not to try and do a Josh/Reva/Billy triangle, which would've really wrecked the relationship between Josh and Billy. I'd have been ok with trying Vanessa/Ross again, and doing a Vanessa/Ross/Holly/Billy quad for a while. I hated Nadine. HATED. She had to be the most insufferable also-ran before ATWT's Julia Lindsay. This is where I wish I knew Roger's history better.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • GROSS. Michael Swan was hot back in his ATWT days. Now he's 76 and WAY past his hot years.    
    • Since she kidnapped, locked up and tried to kill her father's wife I'd say that is still a pretty big deal
    • I'm good with the gushing, too. There aren't many soap icons like John Black, and that's important to celebrate and remember. And yes, life does go on for other characters, but as they say, timing is everything. Going sky diving the day before the funeral? And during a week of shows that were so powerful emotionally? No.    
    • No. There might have been a slight pause for dramatic effect after his "death," but pretty soon after they showed him in France getting plastic surgery and getting involved with his doctor, then planning with her to bring Christina to France. (She thought he had good reason to do it; she wasn't a bad person or anything). Now that I think of it, there must have been some kind of pause before that, during the 70s. Rita was accused of killing a private patient for an inheritance when she lived in Texas. Part of the backstory was that Roger had been there, too. Not sure exactly when or how long that was.
    • I've already stated that I don't like Doug being written as this meek and submissive. It was so lame watching him leave her like that. Vanessa can divorce him, but she then needs to get her thot ass into therapy. She's not only having sex with every guy she runs into, but is now having  sex with a skeevy perv on a poker table. I'm going to give the BTG some credit here. For months, many on this board were delighting in the Vanessa/Joey flirting and what they saw as chemistry. I think we're now seeing what the writers always intended -- that Joey is a disgusting POS wannabe mobster.
    • John Black actually was the ultimate good guy soap hero. So I don’t mind the town gushing over him. It’s deserved.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy