Jump to content

March 28 - April 1, 2011


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I would prefer AMC died as AMC (whatever that means) than try to make OLTL in the sleaze department. It simply wouldn't work. OLTL is the deviant/sleazy soap just like GH is the mob/violent soap. If there was more time, I'm confident that AMC could find it's niche again they just need to change the writng (simple enough right? LOL) and step up the promotion of the right stories in the right ways.

Look at OLTL, the show lives in the gutter: Wendy Williams as Phillis Rose, Kourtney Kardashian, ads on TMZ, Jess's mindfucker continuing to mindfuck her, the Buch hos with their Maury Povich baby daddy scandals, etc... I think AMC would benefit from differentiation. Unfortunately, they won't get a chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think AMC needs the fun type of camp they had in the 80s. The problem now is that camp = sleaze and sickness and way too much self-awareness. I also think it needs more social classes. Why not have Amanda try to fit in with the likes of Enid Nelson? Imagine their heads shaking when they whisper about Janet Green's daughter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There could be a lot of story based on "the new poor," characters who slowly lose most of their money, while other characters become richer and richer. How would they relate to each other after this? Soaps never really do this. Instead someone just loses money overnight and waits tables for a month until their great aunt Lurlene dies and gives them a fortune.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's exactly it. AMC used to rule at camp--but it was in the (quote unquote) Dickens, over the top character sort, not men shirtless for no reason, mocking rape, and reality stars making cameo way. However I think the prob is, even if they reinstated this, it would take too long to grow ANY sort of following to make a ratings diff...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Demos matter but soap demos are doing really poorly as a whole so I doubt that the network regardless if owning the soap or not are happy with their performance. Tvbythenumbers doesn't really deal with daytime broadcasting mainly primetime and their is a difference with the way things are dealt with.

It is sad to see any soap cancelled it just leaves the door open for another one to leave, imo it doesn't matter which ABCD soap is cancel the first one is just the start of all of them leaving the airwaves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The thing is, the demos really aren't awful for some of the soaps...namely the top two, Y&R and GH....and this past week, OLTL. Sure, they look awful to us compared to what we've seen over the years, but the bar keeps dropping. Most daytime talk shows, syndicated and network, have comparable or lower 18-49 demo ratings than the higher-rated soaps.

The only difference is cost, since soaps tend to be more expensive...but a network that owns its shows, like ABC, can keep cutting the budget. Unfortunately, if a soap dips down to where AMC is (a 0.8), it's probably not worth cutting the budget down further.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy