Jump to content

Y&R: Discussion for the month of January


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 241
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

The show sees Billy as a Newman. They hate the Abbott family and they Billy as superior to the Abbotts, which is the reason why they've thrown him in one story and pairing after another even as Billy Miller has tanked each of them. That's also why they had the scenes where Billy trashed John, even though Billy had grown up seeing Billy as a loving father.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Victoria wants a baby that is "theirs", but I don't think she ever said it had to be theirs biologically. She was just talking to Nikki and Nick about the possibility of adoption, but wasn't sure Billy was OK with it. Of course she's going to be heart broken when the truth about this baby comes out, who wouldn't be? My only problem with this story is that Billy and Victoria are to world wise to go down this road. They could easily afford a surrogate, so it makes zero sense that Billy would buy a baby for 2 million dollars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sharon sounded like such an idiot telling Victor that Adam felt bad about what happened to Ashley's baby. That was sick, especially coming out of Sharon's mouth. And honestly, when has Adam felt bad? He's just constantly playing the victim from what I can see. Both characters have become so unappealing for me. I don't understand the popularity or chemistry between Adam and Sharon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

While I generally don't find the show as heinous as ya'll....

I do find it so disappointing that they screwed Nina's storyline over. They've done absolutely NOTHING to develop anything with Nina/Ronan. There's no bonding. No character establishment. Now he's dying, but no one cares. Because he hasn't connected to anyone on the show. Sure, Nina is worried about him...But she hasn't even had a chance to bond with him? Heather has known him for five minutes? Who else is their to grieve? What emotional impact does this storyline have? It's another cheap plot device to bring Chance back to "Save the day"...F that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks for the part about Ronan's dad PJ. I missed that part. It's a shame that they killed off Nina's baby daddy. There could have been plenty of story to tell there.

I figure one reason they don't have Nina and Ronan never bonded was because they weren't sure if Branson was going to stick around and they would rather have the time they do have with him in story with Riegel than Cast. The other being they wanted him to be this tough guy loner.

She did want it to be biological. She told Billy that even though they had Delia and Reed, she wanted to have his baby and she thought that it would have the best of both of them. I understand from a writing standpoint why they aren't going for a surrogacy, because they went this route already with Lily and Cane. It would be nice to see them talk about other options though.

I know it's normal to be upset about losing a child she bonded with, but with Victoria I just don't care. To me it looks like that kid would be nothing more than an accessory to the pathetic Father Knows Best fantasy she has. It's not like with Ashley where I believe she really did love Faith and wanted her to keep the baby. We've already seen Victoria whine and moan for a kid only for her to ignore him after he was born. Plus, I'm just tired of Victoria getting unearned sympathy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ronan is too new/isolated for such a story and I said that from day one. He needed bondings first, especially with Nina. But instead they used the story to put him and Heather together and give ER something to do. I'm not seeing anything interesting about this insta pairing and the focus is just too much on Heather. I do think TC/JB did great in those Nina/Ronan scenes last week but that was needed prior to this story.

What emotional impact does this storyline have? None really but the same is true for all these stories imo. Just plot point after plot point written in a fast food drive-thru type style.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I was focused on 1995 Phillip. With only one child at that point, all he'd really have to rule is his harem of ex's. I'd have loved to watch Grant Aleksander and Rick Hearst go toe to toe, but he's on his way out and I doubt the writers would've ever let A-M best Phillip. 
    • And it’s give me a Zzzzzzzz viewing experience!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • They just aired a montage of Marcus and Dahlia swimming, with music playing in the background singing "Skin to Skin", for 4 MINUTES.  No joke or exaggeration. 4 minutes of them swimming at nighttime, no dialogue, just swimming.  WTF.
    • It's giving Ashley as "type A" personality, while Derek is giving "type B" personality, and they're clashing.
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
    • I remember my late mom express passionate love of the show (being that we're Irish Americans and how Johnny and Maeve Ryan reminded her of her grandfather)... and that she viewed Jillian and Mary as role models. When the show ran on SoapNet years ago, I remember watching the early episodes and having debates with my mom over how strident and militant the show was... especially in regards to feminist issues.  And how I found Mary to be a hypocrite (she's a reporter... yet can't suss out that her father and brother are both toxic and controlling)... and Jillian to not be quite a good role model (yes, she's a lawyer.. but she's happily waiting for Frank to divorce Delia and then after the divorce.. waits for him to win elections as she silently waits on the sidelines). My mom did admit that in retrospect, she did find the show to be a bit strident and explained that it was the 70s and feminism was a huge passion for her and others like her.   And that was when I learned to view soaps without a modern day lens... and eventually I did find enjoyment on the show (and their St Patrick's day celebrations were always a fun tradition).
    • Pink is a good color with her blonde hair 
    •     In a video intetview, it was Richard Backus (Barry) who said Sarah told everyone off at her goodbye party.                                                                               On the Soapnet forum, it was Sean, the MemoryBook webmaster ( he also posts here)  who told us Sarah had been fired. Everyone on the board was shocked. For some reason noobody recalled that. In more recent years, it's been easier to find old press clippings that show that her dismissal was announced in newspapers and magazines.                                      Sean also told us that many of Sarah's castmates were not sorry to see her go. One of the columns about her firing in 1980 said that Sarah "raised the ire" of her co-workers.                                        On the SN board, we were told that Sarah would speak negatively about the show to the press. For example, she reportedly criticized the show for dumping the Pat/Nancy interfaith storyline.  The network didn't like Sarah speaking out like that 
    • Please register in order to view this content

         
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy